Self-efficacy as a protective factor when translating under time pressure

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abihssira, L. (2019). Rasgos de la personalidad y creatividad determinantes en la calidad y la creatividad en traducción [Determining factors of personality and creativity in translation product’s quality and creativity]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Murcia].
• Albin, J. (2012). Competencia y autoeficacia: Estudio de los factores afectivos en el traductor. Hikma, 11, 9–33.
• Angelone, E. (2010). Uncertainty, Uncertainty Management and Metacognitive Problem Solving in the Translation Task. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and Cognition (pp. 17-40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi. org/10.1075/ata.xv.03ang
• Araghian, R., Ghonsooly, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2018). Investigating problemsolving strategies of translation trainees with high and low levels of self- efficacy. Translation, Cognition and Behaviour, 1, 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00004.ara
• Atkinson, D. (2012). Freelance Translator Success and Psychological Skill: A Study of Translator Competence with Perspectives from Work Psychology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland]. Retrieved from: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/ handle/2292/18723. [14 July 2021).
• Atkinson, D. P. (2014). Developing psychological skill for the global language industry: an exploration of approaches to translator and interpreter training. Translation Spaces, 3, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.3.01atk
• Bandura, A. (1995). Self efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales in Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307- 337). Greenwich; CT: Information Age Publishing.
• Bayer-Hohenwarter, G. (2009). Methodological reflections on the experimental design of time-pressure studies. Across Languages and Cultures, 10(2), 193–206. https:// doi.org/10.1556/Acr.10. 2009.2.2
• Beattie, S., Fakehy, M., & Woodman, T. (2014). Examining the moderating effects of time on task and task complexity on the within person self-efficacy and performance relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 605–610.
• Bolaños-Medina, A. (2012). Las pruebas psicométricas en la investigación empírica sobre los procesos cognitivos del traductor. In S. Cruces Colado, M. del Pozo Triviño, A. Luna Alonso, & A. Álvarez Lugrís (Eds.), Traducir en la Frontera (pp. 469–482). Spain: Atrio.
• Bolaños-Medina, A. (2016). Translation psychology within the framework of translator studies: new research perspectives. In C. Martín de León & V. González-Ruíz (Eds.), From the lab to the classroom and back again perspectives on translation and interpreting training (pp. 59–100). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Bolaños-Medina, A., & Núñez, J. (2018). A preliminary scale for assessing translators’ self-efficacy. Across Languages and Cultures, 19, 53–78. https://doi. org/10.1556/084.2018.19.1.3
• Bontempo, K. & Napier, J. (2014). Evaluating emotional stability as a predictor of interpreter competence and aptitude for interpreting. In F. Pöchacker & M. Liu (Eds.), Aptitude for Interpreting (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi. org/10.1075/bct.68.05bon.
• Bosch, J. A., Veerman, E. C. I. Geus, E. J. D., & Proctor, G. B. (2011). A-amylase as a reliable and convenient measure of sympathetic activity: don’t start salivating just yet! Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.12.019
• Cifuentes-Férez, P., & Fenollar-Cortés, J. (2017). On the impact of self-esteem, emotion regulation and emotional expressivity on student translators’ performance. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 71-97.
• Cifuentes-Férez, P., & Meseguer, P. (2018). Can self-esteem and creative intelligence foster accuracy and creativity in professional translators? Translation, Cognition and Behaviour, 1(1), 341–360. https://doi. org/10.1075/tcb.00015.cif
• Costa, R., Serrano, M. A., & Salvador, A. (2016). Importance of self-efficacy in psychoendocrine responses to competition and performance in women. Psicothema, 28(1), 66-70.
• De Rooze, B. (2003). La traducción, contra reloj [The translation, against the clock]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Granada].
• Espín López, L. (2009). Respuesta hormonal y cardiovascular a un estresor social de laboratorio: efectos sobre la memoria declarativa [Hormonal and cardiovascular response to a social laboratory stressor: effects on declarative memory]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Murcia].
• Fida R., Paciello M., Tramontano C., Barbaranelli C., & Farnese M. L. (2015). “Yes, I Can”: the protective role of personal self-efficacy in hindering counterproductive work behavior under stressful conditions. Anxiety Stress Coping, 28(5),479-99. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.969718
• Ghobadi, M., Madadi, G., & Najafian, B. (2017). A study of the effects of time pressure on translation quantity and quality. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies, 5(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.5n.2p.7.
• Gouadec D. (2007). Translation as a Profession. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Hanin, Y. L. (2000). Individual Zones of Optimal Functioning (IZOF) Model. In Y. L. Hanin (Ed.), Emotions in Sport (pp. 65–89). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Hansen, G. (2010). Integrative Description of Translation Processes. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and Cognition (pp. 189–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.11han
• Haro-Soler, M. M. (2017). Teaching practices and translation students’ self- efficacy: the teachers’ perceptions. Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning, 4, 198–228.
• Haro-Soler, M. M. (2018). Translation students’ self-efficacy beliefs: An X of their development. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Granada]. Available at: https:// digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/53590 (Accessed February 20, 2021).
• Haro-Soler, M. M. (2019a). Vicarious learning in the translation classroom: how can it influence students’ self-efficacy beliefs? English Studies at NBU, 1, 92–113. https:// doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.19.1.5
• Haro-Soler, M. M. (2019b). Translator’s self-confidence versus self-efficacy: a terminology proposal and literature review. Cadernos de Tradução, 39, 204–226. https:// doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2019v39n2p204
• Haro-Soler, M. M. (2020). Propuesta de escala de creencias de autoeficacia del traductor: versión en español y en inglés. Tonos digital, 42, 1–28.
• Haro-Soler, M. M., & Kiraly, D. (2019). Exploring self-efficacy beliefs in symbiotic collaboration with students: an action research project. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 13, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1656405
• Hendricks, K. S., Smith, T. D., & Legutki, A. R. (2016). Competitive comparison in music: influences upon self-efficacy beliefs by gender. Gender and Education, 28(7), 918-934.
• Hitches, E., Woodcock, S., & Ehrich, J. (2023). Shedding light on students with support needs: Comparisons of stress, self-efficacy, and disclosure. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(2), 205–2014. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000328
• Hubscher-Davidson, S. (2016). Trait Emotional Intelligence and Translation: A Study of Professional Translators. Target, 28(1), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1075/ target.28.1.06hub
• Jääskeläinen, R. (2000). Focus on methodology in think-aloud studies on translating. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit & R. Jääskeläinen (Eds.), Tapping and Mapping the Processes of Translation and Interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research (pp.71-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Jensen, A. (1999). Time pressure in translation. In Hansen G. (Ed.), Probing the Process in Translation. Methods and Results (pp. 103-119). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
• Jensen, A.. (2000). The effects of time on cognitive processes and strategies in translation. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Copenhagen Business School].
• Jensen, A. & Jakobsen, A. L. (2000). Translating under time pressure: an empirical investigation of problem-solving activity and translation strategies by non-professional and professional translators. In A. Chesterman, N. G. S. Salvador, & Y. Gambier (Eds.), Translation in context: Selected contributions from the EST congress, Granada 1998 (Vol. 39, pp. 105–116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.39.13jen
• Jiménez Ivars, A., Pinazo Catalayud, D., & Ruiz i Fores, M. (2014). Self-efficacy and language proficiency in interpreter trainees. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.908552
• Kavanagh, D. J., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive therapy and research, 9(5), 507-525.
• Kavanagh, D., & Hausfeld, S. (1986). Physical performance and self-efficacy under happy and sad moods. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8(2), 112-123.
• Khalzanova, S. (2008). Revision and time constraints in Translation. [Unpublished MA dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Spain.]
• Kiraly, D. (1995). Pathways to Translation. Pedagogy and Process. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
• Kleiner S. (2014). Subjective time pressure: General or domain specific? Social Science Research 47, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.03.013 PMID:24913948
• Konttinen, K. (2021). A self-efficacy scale for measuring student progress in translation company simulations. Across Languages and Cultures, 22(1), 64-81. https:// doi.org/10.1556/084.2021.00004
• Kourouni, K. (2012). Translating under time constraints in an undergraduate context: A study of students’ products, processes and learning styles. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili].
• Korpal, P. (2016). Interpreting as a stressful activity: Physiological measures of stress in simultaneous interpreting. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 52(2), 297-316.
• Korpal, P., & Jankowiak, K. (2021). On the potential impact of directionality on emotion processing in interpreting. Onomázein: Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 8, 43-60.
• Künzli, A. (2007). Translation Revision: a study of the performance of ten professional translators revising a legal text. In Y. Gambier, M. Schlesinger, & R. Stolze (Eds.), Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies: Selected contributions from the EST Congress, Lisbon 2004 (pp. 115-126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Kussmaul, P. (1995). Training the translator. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Lautenbach, F., & Laborde, S. (2016). The influence of hormonal stress on performance. In M. Raab, B. Lobinger, S. Hoffmann, A. Pizzera, & S. Laborde (Eds.), Performance Psychology (pp. 315-328). San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
• Lee, S.B. (2014). An Interpreting Self-Efficacy (ISE) Scale for Undergraduate Students Majoring in Consecutive Interpreting: Construction and Preliminary Validation. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8(2), 183–203.
• Lehka-Paul, O. (2020). Personality Matters: The Translator’s Personality in the Process of Self-Revision. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
• Lehr, C. (2014). The influence of emotion on language performance: Study of a neglected determinant of decision-making in professional translators. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva].
• Lorenzo, M.P. (2002). Competencia Revisora y Traducción Inversa. Cadernos de Tradução, 2(10), 133-166.
• Lukasik, K. M., Waris, O., Soveri, A., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2019). The relationship of anxiety and stress with working memory performance in a large non-depressed sample. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.00004 PMID: 30728790
• McPherson, G., & J. McCormick. (2006). Self-efficacy and Music Performance. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 322–336.
• Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(3), 141-144.
• Mor, S., Day, H. I., Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (1995). Perfectionism, Control, and Components of Performance Anxiety in Professional Artists. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 207–225.
• Moorkens, J. (2017). Under pressure: translation in times of austerity. Perspectives, 25(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1285331
• Muñoz Martín, R. (2014). Una instantánea movida de la investigación en procesos de traducción. Monografias de Traducción e Interpretación, Special Issue – Minding Translation, 2014, 9-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2014.ne1.1
• Muñoz Martín, R., & Xiao, K. (Eds.) (2020). Cognitive Translation Studies: Theoretical models and methodological criticism [Special issue]. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series–Themes in Translation Studies, 19, 1–24.
• Nielsen, S. E., Segal, S. K., Worden, I. V., Yim, I. S., & Cahill, L. (2013). Hormonal contraception use alters stress responses and emotional memory. Biological Psychology, 92(2), 257-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.10.007
• Ordóñez, L. D., Benson, L., & Pittarello, A. (2015). Time-pressure perception and decision making. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, 2 (pp. 517-542). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118468333.ch18
• Orejudo, S. F., Azarza-Alzugaray, F. J., Casanova, O., Rodríguez-Ledo, C., & Mazas, B. (2017). The Relation of Music Performance Anxiety (MPA) to Optimism, Self-efficacy, and Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment: Testing Barlow’s Theory of Vulnerability on a Sample of Spanish Music Students. Psychology of Music, 45(4), 570–583.
• Pajares, F. (1997). Current Directions in Self-efficacy Research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Randler, C., Demirhan, E., Wüst-Ackermann, P., & Desch, I. H. (2016). Influence of a dissection video clip on anxiety, affect, and self-efficacy in educational dissection: A treatment study. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, 1-8.
• Reigal, R. E., Vázquez-Diz, J. A., Morillo-Baro, J. P., Hernández-Mendo, A., & Morales-Sánchez, V. (2020). Psychological profile, competitive anxiety, moods and self efficacy in beach handball players. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(1), 241.
• Rohleder, N., & Nater, U. M. (2009). Determinants of salivary a-amylase in humans and methodological considerations. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 469–485. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.12.004
• Rojo López, A. M. (2019). La investigación de la creatividad en traducción: Resultados del proyecto TRANSCREA. Granada: Comares.
• Rojo López, A. M., Cifuentes-Férez, P., & Espín López, L. (2021). The influence of time pressure on translation trainees’ performance: Testing the relationship between self-esteem, salivary cortisol and subjective stress response. PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0257727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257727
• Rojo López, A. M., & Naranjo Sánchez, B. (2021). Translating in times of crisis: A study about the emotional effects of the COVID19 pandemic on the translation of evaluative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pragma.2021.01.018
• Rojo López, A. M., Foulquié-Rubio, A. I., Espín López, L., & Martínez Sánchez, F. (2021). Analysis of speech rhythm and heart rate as indicators of stress on student interpreters. Perspectives, 29(4), 591-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/090767 6X.2021.1900305.
• Rojo López, A. M., Ramos, M., & Espín López, L. (2021). Audio Described vs. Audiovisual Porn: Cortisol, Heart Rate and Engagement in Visually Impaired vs. Sighted Participants. Frontiers in Psychology, 29(4), 591-607. 12, 1–15, 661452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661452
• Seisdedos N. (1988). Adaptación Española del STAI, cuestionario de ansiedad estado-rasgo [Spanish adaptation of the STAI, state-trait anxiety inventory]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
• Sharmin, S., Špakov, O., Räihä, K.-J., & Jakobsen, A. L. (2008). Where and for how long do translators look at the screen while translating? In S. Göpferich, A. Jakobsen, & I. Mees (Eds.), Looking at eyes: Eye-tracking studies of reading and translation processing (pp. 31–51). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
• Shreve, G. M., & Lacruz, I. (2014). Translation as higher-order text processing. In S. Bermann & C. Porter (Eds.), A companion to translation studies (pp.107-118). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
• Shreve, Gregory M., & Angelone E. (2010). Translation and Cognition: Recent Developments. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and Cognition (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.01shr
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Suay, F., Salvador, A., González-Bono, E., Sanchís, C., Martínez, M., MartínezSanchis, S., Simón, V. M., & Montoro, J. B. (1999). Effects of competition and its outcome on serum testosterone, cortisol and prolactin. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 24, 551-566.
• Thelwell, R. C., Lane, A. M., & Weston, N. J. (2007). Mood states, self-set goals, selfefficacy and performance in academic examinations. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), 573-583.
• Tirkkonen-Condit, S., & Laukkanen, J. (1996). Evaluations: a key to understanding the affective dimension of translational decisions. Meta, 41, 45–59. https://doi. org/10.7202/002360AR
• Torre Puente, J. C. (2007). Una triple alianza para un aprendizaje universitario de calidad. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas.
• Travis, J., Kaszycki, A., Geden, M., & Bunde, J. (2020). Some stress is good stress: The challenge-hindrance framework, academic self-efficacy, and academic outcomes. Journal of educational Psychology, 112(8), 1632.
• Udayar, S., Fiori, M., & Bausseron, E. (2020). Emotional intelligence and performance in a stressful task: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109790.
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
• Weng, Y., & Zheng, B. (2020). A multi-methodological approach to studying timepressure in written translation: Manipulation and measurement. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 19, 218–236.
• Xiao, K. & Muñoz, R. (2020). Cognitive Translation Studies: Models and methods at the cutting edge. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 19, 1–24.
• Yang Y., Cao X., & Huo, X. (2021). The Psychometric Properties of Translating Self-Efficacy Belief: Perspectives From Chinese Learners of Translation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–11, 642566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642566
• Zeldin, A. L. & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the Odds: Self-efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215-246.
• Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2019). Sources of college EFL learners’ self-efficacy in the English public speaking domain. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 47-59.