Young EFL learners' pausing behaviorexploring pause thresholds in two proficiency levels

  1. Garcés-Manzanera, Aitor 1
  1. 1 Universidad del Atlántico Medio, España
Journal:
Espiral. Cuadernos del profesorado

ISSN: 1988-7701

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 16

Issue: 32

Pages: 64-75

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25115/ECP.V16I32.9047 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Espiral. Cuadernos del profesorado

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The study of pausological behavior in L2 writing has been a matter of interest in recent years (see Lindgren & Sullivan, 2019), leading to a number of empirical studies which have explored pausing behavior from different angles. Among the many elements of pausological behavior, the pause threshold has aroused controversy in recent years (Alves et al., 2008) given its role in helping to discern lower-level and higher-level cognitive processes associated with L2 writing. While the research intent has focused recently on observing how pausological behavior varies according to the pause thresholds in adult L2 writers (Medimorec & Risko, 2017), this element of writing has not been examined in children L2 writers. For that purpose, this study analyzes pausological behavior and transcription fluency based on a picture-based story task by children L2 writers. Results indicate that pauses at word boundaries were more frequent than at sentence or paragraph boundaries. Likewise, the text boundary effect was not fully replicated, contrary to what studies in adult L2 writers have shown (see Wengelin, 2007). 

Bibliographic References

  • Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Chesnet, D., & Fayol, M. (2007). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 13–29). Elsevier Science.
  • Alves, R. A., Castro, S. L., & Olive, T. (2008). Execution and pauses in writing narratives: Processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill. International journal of psychology, 43(6), 969-979.
  • Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & De Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke analysis: Reflections on procedures and measures. Written Communication, 29(3), 246-277.
  • Barkaoui, K. (2019). What Can L2 Writers’ Pausing Behavior Tell Us About Their L2 Writing Processes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226311900010x
  • Cánovas, J. (2017). The use of written models in the teaching of English in Primary [Doctoral dissertation, University of Murcia, Spain]. DIGITUM repository.
  • Chenu, F., Pellegrino, F., Jisa, H., & Fayol, M. (2014). Interword and intraword pause threshold in the writing of texts by children and adolescents: A methodological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 182.
  • Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2014). Pauses in spontaneous written communication: a keystroke logging study. Journal of Writing Research, 6(1).
  • Coyle, Y., Cánovas, G., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002
  • Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2017). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. Taylor & Francis.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy and S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57- 71). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., Turner, C. E., Cahill, M., & Mertens, A. (2013). Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model. Journal of Writing Research, 5, 159–190.
  • Kim, H. (2020). Profiles of undergraduate student writers: Differences in writing strategy and impacts on text quality. Learning and Individual Differences, 78(2020), 101-823.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes. Written Communication, 30(3), 358–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692
  • Medimorec, S., & Risko, E.F. (2017). Pauses in written composition: on the importance of where writers pause. Reading and Writing, 30, 1267-1285.
  • Olive, T., & Cislaru, G. (2015). Linguistic forms at the process-product interface: Analyzing the linguistic content of bursts of production. In G. Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process- product interface (pp. 99–123). John Benjamins.
  • Olive, T., Alves, R. A., & Castro, S. L. (2009). Cognitive processes in writing during pause and execution periods. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 758-785.
  • Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language learning, 64(4), 878-912.
  • Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring Second Language Writers’ Pausing and Revision Behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226311900024x
  • Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer's strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 30-47.
  • Schilperoord, J. (2002). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. In Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 61-87). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (2006). Pausing, productivity and the processing of topic in online writing. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging: Methods and applications (pp. 131–155). Elsevier.
  • Strömqvist, S., Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., & Wengelin, Å. (2006). What keystroke logging can reveal about writing. In Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing (pp. 45-71). Brill.
  • Tiryakioglu, G., Peters, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2019). The effect of L2 proficiency level on composing processes of EFL learners: Data from keystroke loggings, think alouds and questionnaires. In Observing Writing (pp. 212-235). Brill.
  • Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2015). Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition, 38, 79-95.
  • Wengelin, A. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theories, methods and empirical data. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (Vol. 18) (pp. 107-130). Elsevier.
  • Xu, C., & Qi, Y. (2017). Analyzing pauses in computer-assisted EFL writing: A computer-keystroke-log perspective. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 20(4), 24–34.
Data source: Dialnet