Percepción del alumnado sobre la evaluación de historia en Educación Secundaria Obligatoriaanálisis de las calificaciones esperadas y obtenidas

  1. Trigueros Cano, Francisco Javier 1
  2. Miralles Martínez, Pedro 1
  3. Molina Saorín, Jesús 1
  4. Maurandi López, Antonio 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Journal:
Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

ISSN: 0210-1963

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Identidad, patrimonio y pensamiento histórico

Volume: 194

Issue: 788

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3989/ARBOR.2018.788N2009 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

Abstract

This research analyzes the possible sources of variation between the grade that students of high school expect at the end of the course and what they really get, according to information received on the evaluation criteria and the practice of certain study habits. After application of a questionnaire with a sample of more than 1100 students who studied the subject of History, from eleven high schools. The study concludes that better informed students have a smaller difference between expected and obtained grade, whereas the differences are greater in students who consider that they don’t know the evaluation criteria well.

€ View funding

Funding information

Este trabajo es resultado de los proyectos de investigación Criterios, procedimientos e instrumentos de evaluación de los contenidos de Geografía e Historia en el segundo ciclo de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria (08668/PHCS/08), financiado por la Fundación Séneca-Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia en el marco del II PCTRM, y La evaluación de las competencias básicas en Educación Secundaria Obligatoria desde las ciencias sociales (EDU2012-37909-C03-03), subvencionado por el Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Burns, R. (2010). Implementation of Formative Assessment Strategies as Perceived by High School Students and Teachers: Professional Development Implications. [En línea]. Disponible en http:// scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/dissertations/ AAI3398377/
  • Chapin, J. (2006). Introduction: Do elementary school students and their teachers really dislike social studies? The Social Studies, 97 (5), pp. 187-188.
  • Chevalier, A., Gibbons, S., Hoskins, S., Snell, M. y Torpe, A. (2009). Students’ Academic Self-Perception. Economics of Education Review, 28 (6), pp. 716–727.
  • Gentry, M., Gable, R. K. y Rizza, R. K. (2002). Students’ perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, pp. 539–544.
  • Heckert, T. M., Latier, A., Ringwald-Burton A. y Drazen, C. (2006). Relations among student effort, perceived class difficulty appropriateness, and student evaluations of teaching: Is it possible to “buy” better evaluations through lenient granding? College Student Journal, 40 (3), pp. 588-596.
  • Heine, P. y Maddox, N. (2009). Student Perceptions of the Faculty Course Evaluation Process: An exploratory Study of Gender and Class Differences. Research in Higher Education Journal, 3, pp. 1-10.
  • Journell, W. (2010). Perceptions of e-learning in secondary education: a viable alternative to classroom instruction or a way to bypass engaged learning? Educational Media International, 47 (1), pp. 69-81.
  • Maurer, T. (2006). Cognitive dissonance or revenge? Student grades and course evaluations. Teaching of Psychology, 33 (3), pp. 176-179.
  • McCall, A. (2006). Supporting exemplary social studies teaching in elementary schools. The Social Studies, 97 (4), pp. 161-167.
  • McIntyre, D. Pedder, D. y Rudduck, J. (2005). Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers. Research Papers in Education 20 (2), pp. 149-168.
  • Molina, J, Nunes, R. M. y Vallejo, M. (2012). The social perception of people with Down syndrome: the EPSD-1 scale. Educação e Pesquisa, 38 (4), pp. 949- 964.
  • Pedder, D. y McIntyre, D. (2006). Pupil consultation: the importance of social capital. Educational Review, 58 (2), pp. 145-157.
  • Porto, M., García, M. y Navarro, E. (2013). ¿Quéevalúan los instrumentos de evaluación? Valoraciones de estudiantes. Arbor, 189 (760), a018.
  • R Core Team (2012). R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Waugh, C. (2009). Enhancing our understanding of Assessment for Learning: how teachers’ use student consultation strategies to inform the development of classroom assessment practices. En: Munn, P. (ed.). British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Manchester: University of Manchester, pp. 1-17. Disponible en http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/187607.pdf
  • Zhao, Y. y Hoge, J. (2005). What elementary students and teachers say about social studies. The Social Studies, 96 (5), pp. 216-221.
Data source: Dialnet