Social Learning Analytics in Higher EducationAn experience at the Primary Education stage

  1. José Javier Díaz Lázaro 2
  2. Isabel María Solano Fernández 1
  3. María del Mar Sánchez Vera 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Universidad Católica San Antonio
    info

    Universidad Católica San Antonio

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05b1rsv17

Journal:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 6

Issue: 2

Pages: 119-126

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2017.7.232 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The concept of Learning Analytics, as we understand it today, is relatively new but the practice of evaluating user behavior is not innovative. For years, technological development, along with other educational aspects, have encouraged, developed and facilitated this practice as a way of providing a personalized quality experience to students. The main goal of this study, carried out in the Primary Education Degree of the University of Murcia, was to research, from the perspective of Social Learning Analytics, how students learn and collaborate in online environments, specifically through their use of social media. With the idea of improving and optimizing future teaching experiences, a pilot study was conducted using weblog, Twitter and Facebook to work with different topics on the subject. The method used in this research was a participant observation and the analysis performed was both quantitative, based mainly on the data gathered from the learning analytics, and qualitative (analyzing students’ content from comments). Results show that there was greater interaction on Facebook than weblogs, where students interacted to deal with aspects related to the learning process and the topic of the subject. This exchange of information grew during the development of the experience. In addition, learning analytics shows that there is a relationship between group members and their interaction and behavior in networks.

Bibliographic References

  • Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de psicología, 29 (3), 1038-1059. doi:10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
  • Clow, D. (2012). The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. LAK ’12 (p. 134). doi:10.1145/2330601.2330636
  • Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6) 683–695. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.827653
  • Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. D, & Dziuban, Ch. (2013). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology (Research Report). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. Retrieved from http://www. educause.edu/ecar
  • De Laat, M., & Prinsen, F. (2014). Social Learning Analytics: Navigating the Changing Settings of Higher Education. Research and practice in assessment, 9(4), 51-60.
  • Douglas, K. A., Bermel, P., Monzurul Alam, M. D., & Madhavan, K. (2016). Big data characterization of learner behaviour in a high technical MOOC engineering Course. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 170-192. doi:10.18608/ jla.2016.33.9
  • Drachsler, H. (2011). Turning Learning into Numbers A Learning Analytics Framework. Open University of the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www. slideshare.net/Drachsler/turning-learning-into-numbers-a-learning-analytics-framework
  • Ferguson, R., & Buckingham, S. (2012). Social Learning Analytics: Five Approaches. In 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 23-33). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. doi:10.1145/2330601.2330616
  • Hernández, Á., González, I., Jiménez, A. I., & Chaparro, J. (2016). Visualizations of Online Course Interactions for Social Network Learning Analytics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(07), 6-15. doi:10.3991/ijet.v11i07.5889
  • Henríquez, M. A. (2003). Formación del profesorado en las Tecnologías de la Información y de la comunicación (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona.
  • Henríquez, P. (2001). La aplicación didáctica de las TIC en la formación del siglo XXI (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona.
  • Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, L. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGrawHill.
  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/ pdf/2013-horizonreport-HE.pdf
  • Leon, A., Corona, A., Yedra, R., Cruces, E., & Gómez, J. (2015). Social Learning Analytics en grupos de Facebook, para la identificación de estudiantes de bajo desempeño. In IV Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (CBIE 2015). Maceió (Brasil).
  • Monroy, C., Snodgrass, V., & Whitaker, R. (2014). A strategy for incorporating Learning Analytics into the Desing and Evaluation of a K-12 Science Curriculum. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 94-125. doi:10.18608/jla.2014.12.6
  • Nunn, S., Avella, J. T., Kanai, T., & Kebritchi, M. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2). doi:10.24059/olj.v20i2.790
  • Oblinger, D. G. (2012). Let’s talk analytics. EDUCAUSE Review, 47(4). Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1240P.pdf
  • Sclater, N., Peasgood, A., & Mullan, J. (2016). Learning Analytics in Higher Education. A review of UK and international practice. Bristol: Jisc. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/sites/default /files/learning-analytics-in-he-v2_0.pdf
  • Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE review, 46(5), 30.