Biological effects of new chemical-mechanical caries removal products on human dental pulp stem cells

Résumé

AbstractAim: The aim of this study was to compare the biological effects of four chemical caries removal materials and to assess their cytotoxicity using human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs).Methods: The products evaluated are: 1 - Papain based product (BRIX 3000®); 2 - Papain/chloramine based products (NATURAL-CARE and Papacárie Duo®); and 3 - Chloramine based product (Cariesolut); The following in vitro experiments were carried out: IC50 measurement, cell metabolic activity (MTT) assay, cell migration, immunofluorescence experiment, cell apoptosis analysis, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (p<0.05).Results: The IC50 values were: Brix 3000: 0.596%; Papacárie Duo: 0.052%; NATURAL CARE: 1.034%; and Cariesolut: 0.020%. The MTT assays showed non-adequate cell viability of all CMCR tested at 2% at 24, 48, and 72 h (p<0.001). The same behaviour was observed at 0.1% in the Papacárie Duo and Cariesolut groups. In contrast, 0.1% of Brix 3000 at all times and NATURAL CARE at 24h treated cells showed cell viability rates similar to the control group. At 0.01% only Brix 3000 did not show statistically significant differences at any time. Delayed cell migration was observed in all hDPSCs treated with Papacárie Duo and Cariesolut (p<0.01 and p<0.001). Phalloidin staining images showed a high confluence of cells in the presence of NATURAL CARE, similar to the control group. On the contrary, no cells were observed in Brix3000 and Cariesolut at 2% and 0.1% concentrations. Papacárie Duo showed cells at all concentrations, but hDPSCs treated at 0.01% exhibited better proliferation and spreading than those in the control group. Apoptosis assay showed that Brix 3000 at 0.1% and 0.01% had a percentage of live cells higher than 99%, with 68.4% live cells at 2%, 3.69% early apoptotic cells, and 27.9% late apoptotic cells. Conversely, the remaining materials showed abundant apoptotic cells, even at low concentrations. 0.1% and 0.01%of BRIX 3000 did not affect the ROS production levels, while 2% of BRIX 3000 counterparts significantly increased the percentage of CM-H2DCFDA positive cells. Again, all concentrations of Cariesolut showed significantly higher levels of ROS production than those observed in control cells.Conclusion: Our results suggest that Brix 3000 would be the most suitable material for chemical caries removal.