Efectos del método acuático comprensivo en estudiantes de 6 y 7 años

  1. Luciane de Paula Borges 1
  2. Juan Antonio Moreno-Murcia 2
  1. 1 Centro de Enseñanza Concertado Samaniego (España)
  2. 2 Universidad Miguel Hernández (España)
Journal:
Revista de investigación en actividades acuáticas

ISSN: 2530-805X

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Monográfico 2018 Natación en la escuela

Volume: 2

Issue: 3

Pages: 27-36

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21134/RIAA.V2I3.1426 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista de investigación en actividades acuáticas

Abstract

Background: Over the last few decades, there has been a constant concern about how to make the contents of physical education through water activities more appealing to school students. Objectives: The objective of this study was to verify the effect of a Comprehensive Aquatic Methodology with autonomy support on types of knowledge (know-how, knowing how to do it, knowing how to be and global knowledge) in a group of 6 and 7-year-old students in physical education classes in an aquatic environment. Method: Eighty 6 and 7-year-old students participated. A quasi-experimental design was used with a control group and an experimental group. The control group consisted of 38 students, 20 of which were boys and 18 were girls and the experimental group consisted of 42 students, 25 of which were boys and 17 were girls. They were measured through three specifically designed instruments that collected measurements of know-how, knowing how to do it, knowing how to be and global knowledge. The experimental group was taught through the Comprehensive Aquatic Method (MAC) for eight months (20 classes). Results: After the different phases of analysis, construction and validity, through the registration system it was possible to obtain a good system for measuring the types of knowledge. After the intervention, the experimental group presented differences in all types of knowledge, and results were always better in the post-test. The control group also presented differences in all types of knowledge, with worse results in the post-test. Conclusions: The instruments, designed to validate know-how, knowing how to do it, knowing how to be and global knowledge, presented adequate psychometric measures. The active methodology (Comprehensive Aquatic Method) has shown better effects on acquiring knowhow, knowing how to do it, knowing how to behave and global knowledge in aquatic activities in 6 and 7-year-old students in physical education classes.

Bibliographic References

  • Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers’ beliefs andteaching behaviors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36,595-609.
  • Albarracín, A. (2003a). ¿Trabajamos la expresión corporal en el agua? En G. Sánchez, B. Tabernero, F. J. Coterón, C. Llanos, y B. Learreta (Eds.), Expresión, Creatividad y Movimiento. I Congreso Internacional de Expresión Corporal y Educación (pp. 377-383). Salamanca: Amarú.
  • Albarracín, A. (2003b). Los libros de texto referidos al medio acuático. En Actas del Congreso Mundial de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (pp. 195). Granada: Universidad de Granada.
  • Albarracín, A., Eseverri, M., & Tuero, C. (1993). El medio acuático en el ámbito escolar. Perspectivas de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 14, 14-17.
  • Arnold, P. J. (1991). Educación Física, movimiento y Currículum. Madrid: Morata.
  • Ausubel, D., Novak, J. D. & Homesian, H. (1983). Psicología Educativa: un punto de vista cognoscitivo. México: Editorial Trillas.
  • Blázquez, D. (1995). Métodos de enseñanza de la práctica deportiva. En D. Bláquez (Ed.), La iniciación deportiva y el Deporte escolar (pp. 251- 286). Barcelona: Inde.
  • Bovi, F., Palomino, A., & González Henríquez, J. (2008). Evaluación y contraste de los métodos de enseñanza tradicional y lúdico. Pedagogía Deportiva, 94, 29-36.
  • Bovi, F. (2004). Educar a tráves del deporte: actividad lúdica como planteamiento educativo. EFDeportes, Revista Digital, 10, 77. http://www.efdeportes.com/efd77/educar.htm
  • Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2013). Do the benfits from autonomysupportive PE teacher training programs endure? A one-year followup investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 508-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.002
  • Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., & Jang, H. R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 331-346.
  • Devís, J., y Peiró, C. (2004). Materiales curriculares en la educación física. En A. Fraile (Ed.), Didáctica de la Educación Física. Una perspectiva crítica y transversal (pp. 57-68). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
  • Escobar-Pérez, J. & Cuervo-Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6, 27-36.
  • Feldman, K. V., & Klausmeier, H. J. (1975). The effects of two kinds of definitions on the concept attainment of fourthand eighth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 67.
  • Giconda, B. D. (2013). Adapting didactic game in swimming teaching at an early age. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 146-150.
  • Gustavsson, P., Jirwem, M., Aurell, J., Miller, E., & Rudman, A. (2016). Autonomysupportive interventions in schools: A review. Estocolmo: Karolinska Institutet.
  • Gutiérrez, M., & Díaz, F. (2001). Influencia de las actividades acuáticas en el desarrollo de la primera infancia. Agua y Gestión, 55, 12-21.
  • Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Van der Berghe, L., De meyer, J., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Observing physical education teacher’s need-supportive interactions in classroom settings. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35, 3-17.
  • Mornard, M., Jidovtseff, B., Deflandre, D., Delvaux, A., & Cloes, M. (2014). Analyse de l’efficacité de l’accoutumance à l’eau chez l’enfant préscolaire. Science & Sports, 29, Supplement, S13.
  • Morales, E. (2010). Propuesta educativa «El agua como medio de enseñanza: importancia de la evaluación». Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 17, 72-75
  • Moreno, J. A. (2001). Juegos acuáticos educativos. Hacia una competencia motriz acuática (6 -12 años). Barcelona: Inde
  • Moreno, J. A., & Falgas, S. (2001). La utilización de los pasatiempos para la mejora de los contenidos teóricos en actividades acuáticas. En Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Educación Física y Diversidad (pp. 681-692). Murcia: Consejería de Educación.
  • Moreno, J. A., & Gutiérrez, M. (1998). Bases metodológicas para el aprendizaje de las actividades acuáticas educativas. Barcelona: Inde.
  • Perlman, D. (2015). Assisting Preservice teachers toward more motivationally supportive instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(1), 119-130.
  • Ram-Tsur, R., Nissim, M., Zion, M., Ben-Soussan, T. D., & Mevarech, Z. (2013). Language Development: The effect of aquatic and on-land motor interventions. Creative Education, 4(9), 41-50.
  • Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their studendts benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225-236.
  • Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Pshychology, 105, 579-595.
  • Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., Wang, C. K. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: Efecto del apoyo a la autonomía en el enfoque por competencias en educación física multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93-110.
  • Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-Supportive teaching: what it is how to do it. En W. C. Liu et al. (Eds.), Building autonomous learning (pp. 129-153). Singapore: Springer Science and Business Media.
  • Ruiz, L. M. (1999). Control motor y competencia acuática en la infancia. NSW, 3, 10-16.
  • Sarrazin, P., Tessier, D., Pelletier, L., Trouilloud, D., & Chanal, J. (2006). The effects of teachers’ expectations about students’ motivation on teachers autonomy-supportive and controlling behaviors. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Taylor & Francis, 4, 283-301.
  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1995). Estadística no paramétrica aplicada a las ciencias de la conducta. México: Editorial Trillas.
  • Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385-398.
  • Utkin, L. V. (2006). A method for processing the unreliable expert judgments about parameters of probability distributions. [Versión Electrónica]. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 385- 398.
  • RIAA. Revista de Investigación en Actividades Acuáticas | www.revistariaa.com 34 2018 | Volumen 2 | Número 3 | pp. 27-36
  • Van den Berghe, L., Cardon, G., Tallir, I., Kirk D., & Haerens, L. (2016). Dynamics of need-supportive and need-thwarting teaching behaviour: The bidirectional relationship with student engagement and disengagement in the begining of a lesson. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(6), 653-670.
  • Vygotsky, L. (2000). Pensamento e linguagem. Sao Paulo: Martins Fontes.
  • Wiesner, W., & Rejman, M. (2014). Risk management in swimming education. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 8(2), 157-167.
  • RIAA. Revista de Investigación en Actividades Acuáticas | www.revistariaa.com 35 2018 | Volumen 2 | Número 3 | pp. 27-36
Data source: Dialnet