Efectos de la formación universitaria del gerente de pymes familiares en la motivación laboral del empleado

  1. Antonio José Carrasco Hernández
  2. Ángel Luis Meroño Cerdan
Revista:
European Journal of Family Business

ISSN: 2444-877X

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 1

Número: 1

Páginas: 35-51

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V1I1.5033 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Journal of Family Business

Resumen

El presente trabajo, analiza el efecto de la formación del gerente en el grado de motivación laboral de los empleados, así como, su efecto en el desarrollo de ventajas competitivas sostenibles en la pyme familiar. El estudio empírico se desarrolla sobre una muestra de 396 pym e familiares españolas y se encuentra que el potencial motivador del puesto varía en función de la formación del gerente. L a motivación en el puesto es mayor, en organizaciones familiares con un gerente formado, al incrementarse el grado de autonomía, la r etroalimentación y la significación del trabajo para el empleado. Por último, el rendimiento de la organización es mayor al aumentar la formación del gerente y el grado de motivación del trabajo, lo que confirma los argumentos de la teoría de recursos y ca pacidades aplicados a la pyme familiar.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahire. S. L. y Golhar, D. Y (1996). Quality Management in Large versus Small Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 34 (2), 1 - 11.
  • Amit, R. y Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33 - 46.
  • Anderson, J.C. y Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural Modellimg in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two - Steps Approach. Psichological Bulleting, 103 (3), 411 - 423.
  • Aragón, A. y Rubio, A. (2005). Factores asociados con el éxito competitivo de las Pymes en España. Universia Business Review, 8 (3), 38 - 51.
  • Asgari , A., Silong, A.D., Ahmad, A. y Samag, B.A . (2008 ). The Relationship between Organizational Characteristics, Task Characteristics, Cultural Context and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences , 13, 94 - 107.
  • Astrachan, J. y Shanker, M. (2003). Family Businesses’ Contribution to the U.S. Economy: A Closer Look. Family Business Review , 16 (3), 211 - 219.
  • Bagozzi, R. y YI, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74 - 94.
  • Bantel, K . y A, Jackson, S. E (1989). Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make the Difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10 (2), 107 - 124.
  • Barney, J. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competit ive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11 (3), 656 - 665.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99 - 120.
  • Barney, J. B. y Wrigth, P. M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage Human Resource Management , 37 (1), 31 - 46.
  • Barney, J.B. y Arikan, A.M. (2001 ). The resource - based view: origins and implications en M.A. HITT , R.E . Freeman y J.S. Harrison, J.S. (Eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management , Oxford: Blackwell. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin , 107 (2), 238 - 246.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1995 ). EQS structural equations program manual . Encino, California: Multivariate Software.
  • Ca brera - Suárez, K., Saá - Pérez, D. y García - Almeida, D. (2001). The Succession Process from a Resource and Knowledge - Based View of the Family Firm, Family Business Review , 14 (1), 37 - 47.
  • Chou, C .P., Bentler, P.M. y Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled Test Statistic and Robust standard Errors for Non - normal Data in Covariance Structure Analysis, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44 (2), 347 - 357.
  • Davis. P. y Harverston, P . (2000). Internationalization and organizational growth: the impact of Internet Usage and Technology involvement among enterpreneur - led family business. Family Business Review, 13 (2), 107 - 120.
  • De Kok, J.M.P., Uhlaner, L.M. y Thurik, A.R. (2006). Profession al HRM practices in family owned - managed enterprises. Journal of Business Management, 44 (3), 441 - 460.
  • Drucker, P. (2002). La Gerencia . Buenos Aires: El Ateneo. Dyer, W. G. (2006 ). Examining the “Family Effect” on Firm Performance. Family Business Review , 1 9 (4), 253 – 273.
  • Fernández, Z. y Nieto, M. J. (2005 ). Internationalization Strategy of Small and Medium - Sized Family Businesses: Some Influential Factors. Family Business Review , 18 (1), 77 – 89.
  • Fernande z, Z. y Nieto , M.J. (2006 ). Impact of ownership on the i nternational involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies , 37 (3), 340 – 351.
  • Fornell, C. y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (1), 39 - 50.
  • Gallo , M., Ariño, A . , Máñez, I. y Cappuyns K. (2004). La internacionalización a través de alianzas estratégicas en las empresas familiares . Navarra: Universidad de Navarra, IESE.
  • Galve, C. y Salas, V. (2003 ). L a empresa familiar en España. Fundamentos económicos y resultados. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.
  • Habbershon, T.G, Williams. M. y MacMillan. I.C (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4), 451 - 465.
  • Habbershon, T.G. y Williams, M. (1999 ). A resource - based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review , 12 (1), 1 – 25.
  • Hackman, J. R. y Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test a theory . Orga nizational Behavior and Hu man Performance , 16 (2), 250 - 279.
  • Hair, J., Anderson, R. y Black, W. (1999). Análisis Multivariante, Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Hitt, M. Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M. y Sexton, D. L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal , 22 (6 - 7), 479 - 491.
  • Hitt, M., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M. y Sexton, D. L. (2002). Strategic entrepreneurship: Integrating entrepr eneurial and stra tegic management perspectives. E n Hitt, M., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M. y Sexton, D. L. Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Hoelscher, M. L. (2002). The relationship between family capital and family business performance: Collaboration and conflict as moderators . Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas Tech University, Texas, EEUU.
  • Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M. y Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Family Capital Theory. Family Busi ness Review , 1 (2), 135 - 145.
  • Hu, L., Bentl er, P.M. y Kano, Y. (1992). Can test Statics in covariance structure Analysis be Trusted?, Psychological Bulletin , 112 (2), 351 - 362.
  • Idaszak, J. R, y Drasgow, F. (1987). A revision of the Job Diagnostic Survey: Elimination of a measurement artefact, Journal of Applied Psychology , 72 (1), 69 - 74.
  • Kellermanns, F. W. (2005 ). Family Firm Resource Management: Commentary and Extensions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 29 (3), 313 – 319.
  • Klein, S., Astrachan, J. y Smyrnios, K. (2005). The F - PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation and further implication for theory , Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice , 29 (3), pp. 321 - 339.
  • Lerner. M. y Almor. T. (2002). Relationships among Strategic Capabilities and Performance of owned small ventures. Journal of Small Business Management, 40 (2), 109 - 125.
  • Mahoney, J . T. (1995 ). The management of resources and the resource of management . Journal of Business Researc h , 33 (2), 91 – 101.
  • Makadok, R. (2001 ). Toward a synthesis of the resource - based and dynamic - capability view of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal , 22 (5), 387 - 401.
  • Malik, F. (2000). Job Design: Diseño del puesto de trabajo. Revista Capital Humano , 119 (13). Madrid.
  • Martin, G. y Staines. H. (1994). Managerial Competences in Small Firms, The Journal of Management Development, 12 (7), .23 - 34.
  • Monreal, J., Sánch ez Marín, G., Meroño Cerdán, A. y Sabater Sánchez, R . (2009). La gestión de las empresas famil iares: un análisis integral . Madrid: Thomson - Civitas .
  • Noe, R. (1997). Administración de Recursos Humanos . México: Ed. Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana.
  • Norburn, D. y Birley (1988). The Top Management Team and Corporate Performance. Strategic Management Journ al, 9 (3), 225 - 237.
  • Penrose, E . (1959). T he Theory of Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Priem. R. y Butler, J . (2001). Is the resource - based view a useful perspective for strategic management research?, Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 22 - 40.
  • Quinn, R.E. y Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science , 29 (3), 363 - 377.
  • Reid. S. y Adams, J. (2001). Human Resource Management a Surrey of practices within family and non - family firms. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25 (6), 310 - 320.
  • Rubio, A. y Aragón, A. (2009). Recursos críticos y estrategia en la pyme industrial. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de economía , 846 (1), 193 - 212.
  • Ru bio, A. (2004). Factores explicativos del éxito competitivo en la PYME, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España.
  • Satorra, A. y Bentler, P.M. (1991 ). Goodness of fit test under IV estimation: Asymtotic robustness of a NT test statistic . E n Gutierrez, R. y M.J. Valderrama (Eds . ), Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis (pp. 555 - 567 ) . London: World Scientific.
  • Schein, E. (1982 ). Psicología de la Organización . México: Prentice Hall.
  • Schulze, W .S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N. y Buchholtz, A.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence . Organizational Science , 12 (2), 99 - 116.
  • Shanker, M., y Astrachan, J. (2003). Family Businesses’ Contribution to the U.S. Economy: A Closer Look. Family Business Review , 16 (3), 211 - 219.
  • Turner, P. y Lawrence. R. (1965). Industrial Jobs and the Worker. Boston: Harvard Business School .
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource - based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171 - 180.
  • West, S.G., Finch, J.F. y Curran, P.J. (1995). Structu ral equation models with non - normal variables: Problems and remedies , in Hoyle, R.H (Eds), Structural equation modeling: Co ncepts, issues and applications. California: Sage Publications.
  • Wiersema M. F. y Bantel K. A. (1992). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change . Academy of Management Journal, 35 (1), 91 - 121.