Culture wars, perception gap and affective polarizationan approach from the spanish case

  1. Rojo Martínez, José Miguel
  2. Crespo Martínez, Ismael
  3. Mora Rodríguez, Alberto
Revue:
OBETS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales

ISSN: 1989-1385

Année de publication: 2023

Volumen: 18

Número: 1

Pages: 79-96

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/OBETS.21976 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: OBETS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

Previous research has shown the existence of strong relationships between affective polarization and culture wars, but it is unknown to what extent this emotional division is, in fact, a ‘false polarization’ generated from second-order beliefs in those identity issues that categorize and define group membership. Using data from the ‘First National Survey of Political Polarization’ in Spain, an operationalization of the concept of ‘perception gap’ is proposed and an individual measurement of it through a formula that adapts the coefficient of Average Deviation (Dx̄), defined as the arithmetic mean of the absolute values of the deviations from the mean. This seeks to describe the ‘perception gap’ in Spain around two relevant culture wars in the discursive articulation of the ideological blocs: gender violence and national symbols. In the same way, the relationship between the partisan affiliation of the voters and the levels of perceptive gap is analyzed. In this regard, it is shown that, in those matters that are claimed as a symbolic property of an ideological bloc, the supporters of this bloc have a higher level of ‘perception gap’, that is, they tend to exaggerate their differences with the outgroup distorting the real positions of the adversaries. When the thematic battle redirects to a position of moral superiority of the group and becomes a key issue for intergroup differentiation, the homogeneity of the positions of its members is more accentuated and a greater perceptual deviation bias is also produced.

Références bibliographiques

  • Abou-Chadi, T. & Wagner, M. (2021). The electoral appeal of party strategies in postindustrial societies: When can the mainstream left succeed? The Journal of Politics, 81 (4), 1405-1419. https://doi.org/10.1086/704436.
  • Ahler, D. & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: misperceptions about party composition and their consequences’. The Journal of Politics, 80 (3), 964-981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/697253.
  • Ahler, D.J. (2014). Self-fulfilling misperceptions of public polarization. The Journal of Politics, 76 (3), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000085.
  • Aladro Vico, E. & Requeijo Rey, P. (2020). Discurso, estrategias e interacciones de VOX en su cuenta oficial de Instagram en las elecciones del 28-A. Derecha radical y redes sociales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 77, 203-229. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1455 .
  • Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J. & Snyder, J.M. (2006). Purple America. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.97.
  • Bar-On, T. (2021). The Alt-Right’s continuation of the ‘cultural war’ in Euro-American societies, Thesis Eleven, 163 (1), 43-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136211005988.
  • Bar-Tal, D. (1997). The monopolization of patriotism. In D. Bar-Tal & E. Staub (Eds.), Patriotism in the life of individuals and nations (pp. 247–270). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
  • Blatz, C.W. & Mercier, B. (2018). False polarization and false moderation: political opponents overestimate the extremity of each other’s ideologies but underestimate each other’s certainty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9 (5), 194855061771203. https://doi. org/10.1177/1948550617712034.
  • Brady, H.E. & Sniderman, P.M. (1985). Attitude attribution: a group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, 79 (4), 1061-1078. https://doi. org/10.2307/1956248.
  • Chambers, J.R., Baron, R.S & Inman, M.L. (2006). Misperceptions in intergroup conflict: disagreeing about what we disagree about’, Psychological Science, 17 (1), 38- 45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x.
  • Crespo Martínez, I., Rojo Martínez, J. M., & Mora Rodríguez, A. (2021). La falsa percepción sobre las creencias de los otros: ¿Causa o consecuencia de la polarización afectiva? Más Poder Local, 45, 75-94.
  • De Vries, C.E., Hakhverdian, A. & Lancee, B. (2013). The dynamics of voters´ left/right identification: the role of economics and cultural attitudes. Political Science Research and Methods, 1 (2), 223-238. https://doi. org/10.1017/psrm.2013.4.
  • Fiorina, M.P., Abrams, S. & Pope, J.C. (2010). Culture War? The myth of a polarized America, Longman, New York.
  • Frank, T. (2004) What’s the Matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
  • Frenbach, P.M. & Van Boven, L. (2022). False polarization: cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions. Current opinion in Psychology, 43, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. copsyc.2021.06.005.
  • Gidron, N., Adams, J. & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/9781108914123.
  • Goren, P. & Chapp, C. (2017). Moral power: How public opinion on culture war issues shapes partisan predispositions and religious orientations. American Political Science Review, 111 (1), 110-128. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0003055416000435.
  • Graham, J., Nosek, B.A. & Haidit, J. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoSONE, 7 (12), e50092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0050092.
  • Green, J. (2007). When voters and parties agree: valence issues and party competition. Political Studies, 55 (3), 629– 655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x.
  • Harteveld, E. (2021). Fragmented foes: affective polarization in the multiparty context of the Netherlands. Electoral Studies, 71, 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. electstud.2021.102332.
  • Hayes, D. (2008). Party reputations, journalistic expectations: how issue ownership influences election news. Political Communication, 25 (4), 377-400. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426981.
  • Hetherington, M.J., Long, M.T. & Rudolph, T.J. (2016). Revisiting the myth: new evidence of a polarized electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw003.
  • Hunter, J.D. (1991) Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
  • Iyengar, S. and Westwood, S.J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (3), 690-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152.
  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S.J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-polisci-051117-073034.
  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76 (3), 405-431. https://doi. org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.
  • Johnston, C.D., & Wronski, J. (2015). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology, 36 (1), 35-53. https://doi. org/10.1111/pops.12068.
  • Kalin, M., & Sambanis, N. (2018). How to think about Social Identity. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 239-257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpolisci-042016-024408.
  • Kenyon, T. (2014). False polarization: debiasing as applied social epistemology. Synthese, 191, 2529-2547. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0438-x.
  • Less, J., & Cikara, M. (2021). Understanding and combating misperceived polarization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376 (1822), 20200143. https://doi. org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0143.
  • Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016). (Mis)perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80 (1), 378-391. https://doi. org/10.1093/poq/nfv045.
  • Linville, P. W., Salovey, P., & Fischer, G. W. (1986) ‘Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to ingroup-outgroup perception’. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.) Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 165–208). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Martín Criado, E. (1998). Los decires y los haceres. Papers, 56, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.1944.
  • Mason, L. (2015). ‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (1), 128–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089.
  • Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: how politics become our identity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https:// doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001
  • Mayordomo Zapata, C. (2021). Diferencias de género y edad en la polarización afectiva española: ¿Quién está más polarizado? Más Poder Local, 45, 147-161.
  • Mildenberger, M., & Tingley, D. (2017). Beliefs about climate beliefs: the importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. British Journal of Political Science,49 (4), 1279-1307. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0007123417000321.
  • Miller, L. (2020). Polarización en España: más divididos por ideología e identidad que por políticas públicas. EsadeEcPol Center for Economic Policy, Barcelona. Available online at: https://itemsweb.esade.edu/research/ EsadeEcPol-insight-polarizacion.pdf.
  • Montero, J.R., Calvo, K., & Martínez, A. (2008). El voto religioso en España y Portugal. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 66 (51), 19-54. https://doi.org/10.3989/ ris.2008.i51.108 .
  • Moore-Berg, S.L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.A., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E. (2020). Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117 (26), 14864-14872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001263117.
  • Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019) Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/9781108595841.
  • Orriols, L. (2021) La polarización afectiva en España: bloques ideológicos enfrentados. EsadeEcPol Center for Economic Policy. Available at: https://www.esade.edu/ecpol/es/ publicaciones/polarizacion-afectiva/.
  • Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). John thinks that Mary thinks that…: Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39 (3), 437–471. https://doi. org/10.1016/0022-0965(85)90051-7.
  • Petrocik, J.R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40 (3), 825-850.
  • Petrocik, J.R., Benoit, W.L., & Hansen, G.L. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952-2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118 (4), 599-626. https://doi. org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00407.x.
  • Smith Castro, V. (2006). La psicología social de las relaciones intergrupales: modelos e hipótesis. Actualidades en Psicología, 20 (107), 45-71.
  • Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgement of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64 (3), 192–204. https:// doi.org/10.1037/h0047878
  • Tajfel, H. (1984) Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Barcelona: Heder.
  • Tirapu-Ustárroz, J., Pérez-Sayes, G., Erekatxo-Bilbao, M. & Pelegrín-Valero, C. (2007). ¿Qué es la teoría de la mente? Revista de Neurología, 44 (8), 479-489.
  • Van Boven, L., Judd, C. M., & Sherman, D. K. (2012). Political polarization projection: Social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (1), 84– 100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028145.
  • Viciana, H., Hannikainen, I.R. & Gaitán Torres, A. (2019). The dual nature of partisan prejudice: morality and identity in a multiparty system. Plos One, 14(7), e0219509. https://doi.org/10.1371/.
  • Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J.R., & Judd, C.M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10 (2), 145-158. https://doi. org/10.1177/1745691615569849.
  • Westwood, S.J., Iyengar, S., Walgrave, S., Leonisio, R., Miller, L. y Strijbis, O. (2018). The tie that divides: Crossnational evidence of the primacy of partyism. European Journal of Political Research, 57 (2), 333-354. https://doi. org/10.1111/1475-6765.12228.
  • Williams, R.H. (1997) Cultural wars in American Politics: critical reviews of a popular myth (social problems & social issues). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Yudkin, D.A., Hawkins, S. & Dixon, T. (2019). The perception gap: How false impressions are pulling Americans apart. New York: More in Common. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ r3h5q.
  • Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691.
La source de données: Dialnet