Estilo interpersonal controlador y motivación en educación física: Una revisión sistemática

  1. Antonio Granero Gallegos 1
  2. María Carrasco Poyatos 1
  3. Juan Jorquera Jordán 2
  4. Manuel Gómez López 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Almería, España
  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia, España
Revista:
E-Balonmano.com: Revista de Ciencias del Deporte

ISSN: 1885-7019

Ano de publicación: 2022

Volume: 18

Número: 3

Páxinas: 257-270

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: E-Balonmano.com: Revista de Ciencias del Deporte

Resumo

The teacher's interpersonal style has a significant role in the attitude and motivation of students, and although the current educational system suggests the use of more student-centered styles, in Physical Education (PE), traditional styles are still mainly used. The purpose was to analyze the relationship between teacher-controlling interpersonal style and student motivation in the context of PE classes. A search was carried out in WOS, Ebsco, Scopus and Cochrane taking into consideration the different inclusion criteria specified in the document. Forty-two publications were identified, from which six were selected that met the established eligibility criteria. It was concluded that the adoption by teachers of a controlling interpersonal style is closely related to less self-determined forms of motivation, generating a negative classroom environment conditioned by the lack of student autonomy, and therefore the adoption of more innovative and active methodologies centered on the students is suggested.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abós, Á., Sevil, J., Sanz, M., Aibar, A., y García-González, L. (2016). El soporte de autonomía en Educación Física como medio de prevención de la oposición desafiante del alumnado. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 43(12), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2016.04304
  • Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Keer, H., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., y Haerens, L. (2012). Students’ objectively measured physical activity levels and engagement as a function of between-class and between-student differences in motivation toward physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 457-480. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.4.457
  • Assor, A., Roth, G., y Deci, E. L. (2004). The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A Self-Determination Theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 47-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00256.x
  • Baena-Extremera, A., Gómez-López, M., Granero-Gallegos, A., y Martínez-Molina, M. (2016). Modelo de predicción de la satisfacción y diversión en Educación Física a partir de la autonomía y el clima motivacional. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-2.mpsd
  • Barkoukis, V., Taylor, I., Chanal, J., y Ntoumanis, N. (2014). The relation between student motivation and student grades in physical education: A 3-year investigation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 24, 406-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12174
  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Mouratidis, A., Katartzi, E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., y Vlachopoulos, S. (2018). Beware of your teaching style: A school-year long investigation of controlling teaching and student motivational experiences. Learning and Instruction, 53, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.006
  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., y Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11) 1459-1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125
  • Bekiari, A. (2016). Insights into instructors’ verbal aggressiveness and students’ machiavellianism through leadership style and motivational climate. European Scientific Journal, 12(25), 90-110. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n25p90
  • Booth, A., Clarke, M., Dooley, G., Ghersi, D., Moher, D., Petticrew, M., y Stewart, L. (2013). PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility. Systematic Reviews, 2(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-4
  • De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., Aelterman, N., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., y Haerens, L. (2016). The different faces of controlling teaching: implications of a distinction between externally and internally controlling teaching for students’ motivation in physical education.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(6), 632-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1112777
  • De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Van Petegem, S., y Haerens, L. (2016). Do students with different motives for physical education respond differently to autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.001
  • De Meyer, J., Speleers, L., Tallir, I. B., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Van den Berghe, L., y Haerens, L. (2014). Does observed controlling teaching behavior telate to students’ motivation in physical education? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 541-554. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034399
  • Deci, E. L. y Ryan, R. M. (2000). The «what» and «why» of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Deci, E. L., y Ryan, R. M. (2014). Autonomy and need satisfaction in close relationships: relationships motivation theory. En N. Weinstein (Ed.), Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: theory, research, and applications (pp. 53-73). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_4
  • Duffy, J., Warren, K., y Walsh, M. (2002). Classroom interactions: gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex Roles, 45, 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014892408105
  • Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., Iver, D. Mac, y Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students’ motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 553-574. https://doi.org/10.1086/461740
  • Eckes, A., Großmann, N., y Wilde, M. (2018). Studies on the effects of structure in the context of autonomy-supportive or controlling teacher behavior on students’ intrinsic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.011
  • Granero-Gallegos, A. (2020). Hacia una enseñanza competencial, una propuesta desde la Educación Física. EDUAL.
  • Granero-Gallegos, A., Gómez-López, M., Baena-Extremera, A., y Martínez-Molina, M. (2020). Interaction effects of disruptive behaviour and motivation profiles with teacher competence and school satisfaction in secondary school physical education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010114
  • Granero-Gallegos, A., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., y Carrasco-Poyatos, M. (2021). Estilo docente y competencia en educación superior: mediación del clima motivacional. Educación XX1, 24(2), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.28172
  • Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., y Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
  • Haerens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., y Van den Berghe, L. (2016). Toward a systematic study of the dark side of student motivation: antecedents and consequences of teachers’ controlling behaviors. En W. C. Liu, J. W. C. Keng, y R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Building autonomous learners. Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 59-81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1577592
  • Haraldsen, H. M., Halvari, H., Solstad, B. E., Abrahamsen, F. E., y Nordin-Bates, S. M. (2019). The role of perfectionism and controlling conditions in norwegian elite junior performers’ motivational processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01366
  • Hein, V., Emeljanovas, A., y Mieziene, B. (2018). A cross-cultural validation of the controlling teacher behaviours scale in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 24(2), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16681821
  • Hernández-Andreo, L., Gómez-López, M., Gómez-Mármol, A., García-Vélez, A. J., y Sánchez-Alcaraz, B. J, (2021). Necesidades psicológicas básicas y creencias implícitas de habilidad en educación secundaria. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 14(28), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v14i28.4177
  • Higgins, J. P. T., y Green S. (Eds.) (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration.
  • Huéscar, E., Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Ruiz, L., y León, J. (2019). Motivational profiles of high school physical education students: the role of controlling teacher behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101714
  • Jang, H., Kim, E. J., y Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175-1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028089
  • Jang, H., Kim, E. J., y Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
  • Koka, A., Tilga, H., Kalajas-Tilga, H., Hein, V., y Raudsepp, L. (2019). Perceived controlling behaviors of physical education teachers and objectively measured leisure-time physical activity in adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2709), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152709
  • Liu, J., Bartholomew, K., y Chung, P.-K. (2017). Perceptions of Teachers’ Interpersonal Styles and Well-Being and Ill-Being in Secondary School Physical Education Students: The role of need satisfaction and need frustration. School Mental Health, 9, 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-017-9223-6
  • Lonsdale, C., Lester, A., Owen, K. B., White, R. L., Peralta, L., Kirwan, M., Diallo, T. M. O., Maeder, A. J., Bennie, A., Macmillan, F., Kolt, G. S., Ntoumanis, N., Gore, J. M., Cerin, E., Cliff, D. P., y Lubans, D. R. (2019). An internet-supported school physical activity intervention in low socioeconomic status communities: Results from the Activity and Motivation in Physical Education (AMPED) cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53, 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097904
  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: growing up apart, coming together. Belknap Press.
  • Manzano-Sánchez, D. (2021). Diferencias entre aspectos psicológicos en Educación Primaria y Educación Secundaria. Motivación, Necesidades psicológicas básicas, Responsabilidad, Clima de aula, Conductas antisociales y Violencia. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 14(28), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v14i28.4198
  • Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J., y Cecchini-Estrada, J. A. (2013). Climas motivacionales, necesidades, motivación y resultados en Educación Física. Aula Abierta, 41, 63-72.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., y Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., y Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Huéscar, E., y Ruiz, L. (2018). Perceptions of controlling teaching behaviors and the effects on the motivation and behavior of high school physical education students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102288
  • Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Pintado, R., Huércar, E., y Marzo, J. C. (2018). Estilo interpersonal controlador y percepción de competencia en educación superior. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 11(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v11i1.184
  • Mouratidou, K., Goutza, S., y Chatzopoulos, D. (2007). Physical Education and moral development: An intervention programme to promote moral reasoning through Physical Education in high school students. European Physical Education Review, 13, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X07072675
  • Núñez, J.L., Martín-Albo, J., y Domínguez, E. (2010). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en sujetos practicantes de actividad física. Revista de Psicologia del Deporte, 19(2), 291-304.
  • Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
  • Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: what it is, how to do it. En W. C. Liu, J. W. C. Keng, y R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Building Autonomous Learners. Perspectives from Research and Practice Using Self-Determination Theory (pp. 129–153). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0
  • Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., Kaplan, H., Moss, J. D., Olaussen, B. S., y Wang, C. K. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0
  • Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., y Goossens, L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025742
  • The Campbell Collaboration (2019). Campbell systematic reviews: policies and guidelines. Campbell Policies Guidel, 1.
  • Van Petegem, S., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., y Beyers, W. (2015). Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory. Child Development, 86(3), 903-918. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.1235
  • Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O’Conell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., y Losos, M. (2012). Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if non randomized studies in metaanalyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm
  • Zapatero, J. A. (2017). Benefits of teaching styles and student-centered methodologies in Physical Education. E-balonmano.com. Revista de Ciencias del Deporte, 13, 237-250.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet