Apego, duelo y continuidad de lazos en el afrontamiento de la pérdida

  1. Estela Fernández Pérez 1
  2. Enrique Javier Garces de Los Fayos Ruiz 1
  3. Ana Isabel Peinado Portero 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Revista de psicología de la salud

ISSN: 2386-2300,  0214-6118

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 10

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología de la salud

Resumen

Esta revisión sistemática ha considerado la literatura publicada en los últimos 30 años sobre las relaciones existentes entre el apego, el proceso de duelo y el afrontamiento de la pérdida. El apego es el vínculo que se establece en el momento del nacimiento, principalmente con los cuidadores primarios. El proceso de duelo es la reacción que se produce ante la pérdida de una relación cercana. La continuidad de lazos es una herramienta que utilizan los dolientes para mantenerse unidos al fallecido. El trabajo se fundamenta principalmente en estudios empíricos con muestras de sujetos donde, en su mayoría, se tomaban medidas de apego, de duelo y de continuidad de lazos. Los resultados de dichos estudios arrojan relaciones entre las tres variables, sin embargo, no se pueden establecer relaciones causales, por lo que se necesita más investigación que pueda esclarecer la relación existente entre dichas variables. En términos generales, el apego seguro se relaciona con un proceso de duelo más adaptativo y el apego ansioso y evitativo dificultan el proceso de duelo. Por otro lado, la continuidad de lazos con el fallecido resultará adaptativa o desadaptativa en función de si se ajustan o no al sistema de significado dominante de la persona.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baker, J. E. (2001). Mourning and the transformation of object relationships: Evidence for the persistence of internal attachments. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(1), 55–73. https://doi. org/10.1037/0736-9735.18.1.55
  • Berenguer-Pérez, M., Barreto-Martín, P., & Pérez-Marín, M. (2018). Apego y superación de la pérdida de una persona significativa. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 27(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2017.1043
  • Black, J., Belicki, K., Piro, R., & Hughes, H. (2020). Comforting Versus Distressing Dreams of the Deceased: Relations to Grief, Trauma, Attachment, Continuing Bonds, and Post-Dream Reactions. Omega (United States). https://doi. org/10.1177/0030222820903850
  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Loss, sadness, and depression (Vol. 3). New York: Basic Books.
  • Field, N. P., & Sundin, E. C. (2001). Attachment style in adjustment to conjugal bereavement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(3), 347-361. doi:10.1177/0265407501183003
  • Field, N. P., & Filanosky, C. (2010). Continuing bonds, risk factors for complicated grief, and adjustment to bereavement. Death Studies, 34(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180903372269
  • Field, N. P., Gal-Oz, E., & Bonanno, G. A. (2003). Continuing bonds and adjustment at 5 years after the death of a spouse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.110
  • Field, N. P., Gao, B., & Paderna, L. (2005). Continuing bonds in bereavement: An attachment theory based perspective. Death Studies, 29(4), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590923689
  • Field, N. P., Nichols, C., Holen, A., & Horowitz, M. J. (1999). The relation of continuing attachment to adjustment in conjugal bereavement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 212– 218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.212
  • Fraley, R. C., & Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Attachment and loss: A test of three competing models on the association between attachment-related avoidance and adaptation to bereavement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 878– 890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264289
  • Ho, S. M. Y., Chan, I. S. F., Ma, E. P. W., & Field, N. P. (2013). Continuing Bonds, Attachment Style, and Adjustment in the Conjugal Bereavement Among Hong Kong Chinese. Death Studies, 37(3), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2011.6 34086
  • Holland, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2011). Separation and traumatic distress in prolonged grief: The role of cause of death and relationship to the deceased. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33(2), 254–263. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10862-010-9214-5
  • Karydi, E. (2018). Childhood bereavement: The role of the surviving parent and the continuing bond with the deceased. Death Studies, 42(7), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1 363829
  • Kho, Y., Kane, R. T., Priddis, L., & Hudson, J. (2015). The nature of attachment relationships and grief responses in older adults: An attachment path model of grief. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133703
  • Ludwikowska-Świeboda, K. (2020). Attachment style and experiencing the symptoms of complicated grief after the death of a spouse – Preliminary research among widowed women. Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna, 20(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.15557/PiPK.2020.0015
  • Mancini, A. D., & Bonanno, G. A. (2012). The persistence of attachment: Complicated grief, threat, and reaction times to the deceased’s name. Journal of Affective Disorders, 139(3), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.032
  • Meier, A. M., Carr, D. R., Currier, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2013). Attachment anxiety and avoidance in coping with bereavement: Two studies. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1521/ jscp.2013.32.3.315
  • Meyer-Lee, C. B., Jackson, J. B., & Gutierrez, N. S. (2020). Long-Term Experiencing of Parental Death During Childhood: A Qualitative Analysis. Family Journal, 28(3), 247–256. https://doi. org/10.1177/1066480720926582
  • Neimeyer, R. A. (2019). Meaning reconstruction in bereavement: Development of a research program. Death Studies, 43(2), 79–91. https://doi. org/10.1080/07481187.2018.1456620
  • Neimeyer, R. A., Baldwin, S. A., & Gillies, J. (2006). Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning: Mitigating complications in bereavement. Death Studies, 30(8), 715–738. https://doi. org/10.1080/07481180600848322
  • Rubin, S. S., Malkinson, R., & Witztum, E. (2003). Trauma and bereavement: Conceptual and clinical issues revolving around relationships. Death Studies, 27(8), 667–690. https://doi. org/10.1080/713842342
  • Russac, R. J., Steighner, N. S., & Canto, A. I. (2002). Grief work versus continuing bonds: A call for paradigm integration or replacement? Death Studies, 26(6), 463–478. https://doi. org/10.1080/074811802760138996
  • Sable, P. (1991). Attachment, Loss of Spouse, and Grief in Elderly Adults. OMEGA Journal of Death and Dying, 23(2), 129–142. https://doi. org/10.2190/pu6v-h0nw-61ny-1w5g
  • Sable, P. (1992). Attachment, Loss of Spouse, and Disordered Mourning. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 73(5), 266–273. https://doi. org/10.1177/104438949207300502
  • Shear, K., & Shair, H. (2005). Attachment, loss, and complicated grief. Developmental Psychobiology, 47(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/ dev.20091
  • Smigelsky, M. A., Bottomley, J. S., Relyea, G., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2020). Investigating risk for grief severity: Attachment to the deceased and relationship quality. Death Studies, 44(7), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2018.1548539
  • Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (2005). To continue or relinquish bonds: A review of consequences for the bereaved. Death Studies, 29(6), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590962659
  • Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2005). Attachment in coping with bereavement: A theoretical integration. Review of General Psychology, 9(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089- 2680.9.1.48
  • Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). PRISMA declaration: A proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medicina Clinica, 135(11), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. medcli.2010.01.015
  • Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2013). The PRISMA statement: a step in the improvement of the publications of the Revista Española de Salud Pública. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 87(2), 99-102. https://doi.org/ 10.4321/S1135- 57272013000200001.
  • Wayment, H. A., & Vierthaler, J. (2002). Attachment style and bereavement reactions. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 7(2), 129–149. https://doi. org/10.1080/153250202753472291
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet