In bed with an Egyptian princessHerodotus on theft, pyramids and conquest

  1. Carmen Sánchez Mañas 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Zeitschrift:
Feminismo/s

ISSN: 1696-8166,  1989-9998

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Nummer: 39

Seiten: 267-285

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.14198/FEM.2022.39.10 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Andere Publikationen in: Feminismo/s

Zusammenfassung

Following in the footsteps of Homer, both in the Iliad and in the Odyssey, Herodotus of Halicarnassus gives women a very conspicuous presence in the only work attributed to him, known as the Histories. Usually, the women who appear in his work are directly related to prominent male characters. In this respect, daughterhood is one of the most distinct roles played by women in Herodotus’ Histories. Twelve of the women actively involved in the narrative written by the author of Halicarnassus are identified as daughters of kings, tyrants or other noblemen, both of Greek and barbarian origin. Among the available examples, in this paper we focus on three Egyptian princesses, daughters of the pharaohs Rhampsinitus, Cheops and Amasis —in reality, Apries—, because they constitute precious instances for exploring the tensions arising in parent-child relationships in the Herodotean work. We aim at determining whether these princesses are individually fulfilled as characters, despite being sexually dominated daughters by their fathers, either biological other putative. To this end, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the three passages in which they appear (Hdt. 2.121ε; 2.126; 3.1), taking into account why and under what circumstances they are sexually controlled, how they interact with their fathers and other male characters and what consequences the sexual control they are subjected to has on them. Results show that the three Egyptian princesses achieve their own fulfilment as a wife, builder and avenger, respectively. We conclude that Herodotus confers on them visibility, dignity and their own non-transferable personality.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Aissaoui, A. I. (2020). Diplomacy in Ancient Times: The Figure of Udjahorresnet: An International Relations Perspective. Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections, 26, 12-34.
  • Aly, W. (1921). Volksmärchen, Sage und Novelle bei Herodot und seinen Zeitgenossen. Eine Untersuchung über die Volkstümlichen Elemente der Altgriechischen Prosaerzählung. Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht.
  • Asheri, D., Medaglia, S. & Fraschetti, A. (1990). Erodoto. Le Storie. Libro III. La Persia. Mondadori.
  • Baragwanath, E. (2015). Characterization in Herodotus. In R. Ash, J. Mossman & F. B. Titchener (Eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography (pp. 17-35). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662326.003.0002
  • del Barrio Álvarez, E. (2018). Satisfacción revolucionaria. Un modelo de intervención psicológica para supervivientes de trata que hacen trabajo sexual después de los 40. Feminismo/s, 31, 39-63. https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2018.31.02
  • Bichler, R. (2018). Herodotus’ Book 2 and the Unity of the Work. In T. Harrison & E. Irwin (Eds.), Interpreting Herodotus (pp. 75-98). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803614.003.0004
  • Blok, J. (2002). Women in Herodotus. In E. J. Bakker, I. J. F. de Jong & H. van Wees (Eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (pp. 225-242). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217584_011
  • Boedeker, D. (2011). Persian Gender Relations as Historical Motives in Herodotus. In R. Rollinger, B. Truschnegg & R. Bichler (Eds.), Herodot und das Persische Weltreich (pp. 211-235). Harrassowitz Verlag.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2000). La dominación masculina (J. Jordá, Trad.). Anagrama.
  • Bowie, A. (2018). Herodotus the Story-teller. In E. Bowie (ed.), Herodotus. Narrator, Scientist, Historian (pp. 25-36). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583557-002
  • Brosius, M. (1996). Women in Ancient Persia (559-531 BC). Clarendon Press.
  • Clarke, K. (2015). Putting up Pyramids, Characterizing Kings. In R. Ash, J. Mossman & F. B. Titchener (Eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography (pp. 37-51). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662326.003.0003
  • Dewald, C. (1981). Women and Culture in Herodotus’ Histories, in H. Foley (Ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity (pp. 91-125). Routledge.
  • Griffiths, A. (2001). Behind the Lines: the Genesis of Stories in Herodotus. In F. Budelmann & P. Michelakis (Eds.), Homer, Tragedy and Beyond: Essays in Honour of P. E. Easterling (pp. 75-89). Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies.
  • Hollmann, A. (2011). The Master of Signs. Signs and the Interpretation of Signs in Herodotus’ Histories. Harvard University Press.
  • Irwin, E. (2017). Just Why Did Cambyses Conquer Egypt? Herodotus’ Logos of Cambyses’ Egyptian Campaign: His Story as History. In R. Rollinger (Ed.), Die Sicht auf die Welt zwischen Ost und West (750 v. Chr. 550 n. Chr.) (pp. 95-141). Harrassowitz Verlag. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc2rmq3.7
  • Konstantakos, I. (2018). Time, Thy Pyramids: The Novella of Mycerinus (Herodotus 2.129–134). In E. Bowie (Ed.), Herodotus. Narrator, Scientist, Historian (pp. 77-107). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583557-005
  • Kurke, L (1999). Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton University Press.
  • Lateiner, D. (2015). Ou kata nomon: Obscene Acts and Objects in Herodotus’ Histories. In D. Dutsch & A. Suter (Eds.), Ancient Obscenities. Their Nature and Use in the Ancient Greek and Roman Worlds (pp. 91-124). The University of Michigan Press.
  • Lidov, J. B. (2002). Sappho, Herodotus and the Hetaira. Classical Philology, 97(3), 203-237. https://doi.org/10.1086/449585
  • Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2013). King and Court in Ancient Persia 559 to 331 BC. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Lloyd, A. & Fraschetti, A. (1996). Erodoto. Le Storie. Libro II. L’Egitto. Mondadori .
  • Luraghi, N. (2013). The Stories before the Histories: Folktale and Traditional Narrative in Herodotus. In R. V. Munson (Ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Herodotus. Volume 1 (pp. 87-112). Oxford University Press.
  • Mañas Viejo, C. & Martínez Sanz, A. (2020). Between Coercion and Consent: A Study on Male Sexual Violence in Heterosexual Partner Relationships. Masculinities & Social Changes, 6(3), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2020.5663
  • McKeon, K. P. J. (2020). Barbarians at the Gate: Herodotus, Bisotun, and a Persian Punishment in Egypt. American Journal of Philology, 141(3), 349-380. https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2020.0020
  • Munson, R. V. (1993). Herodotus’ Use of Prospective Sentences and the Story of Rhampsinitus and the Thief in the Histories. The American Journal of Philology, 114(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/295380
  • Neitzel, H. (1993). Prinzessin und Meisterdieb bei Herodot (2, 121 ε). Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, 19, 215-238.
  • Pelling, C. (2016). Herodotus’ Persian Stories: Narrative Shape and Historical Interpretation. Syllecta Classica, 27, 65-92. https://doi.org/10.1353/syl.2017.0002
  • Pelling, C. (2019). Herodotus and the Question Why. University of Texas Press.
  • Purves, A. (2013). Haptic Herodotus. In S. Butler & A. Purves (Eds.), Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses (pp. 27-41). Acumen.
  • von Reden, S. (1997). Money, Law and Exchange: Coinage in the Greek Polis. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 117, 154-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/632554
  • Rood, T. (2006). Herodotus and Foreign Lands. In C. Dewald & J. Marincola (Eds.), Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (pp. 290-305). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052183001X.020
  • Ruiz Sánchez, M. (2009). La mano cortada. Cuentos de ladrones de Heródoto a nuestros días (I). Myrtia, 24, 239-272.
  • Russo, J. & Simon, B. (2017). Gambling with Demeter: Winning, Losing, and Successful Outcome in Herodotus’ Histories. Arion 25(1), 131-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/arion.25.1.0131
  • Sousa, R. (2020). Herodotus’ Memphite Sources. In T. Figueira & C. Soares (Eds.), Ethnicity and Identity in Herodotus (pp. 201-219). London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315209081-13
  • Suárez de la Torre, E. (2020). Women as Users of Erotic Spells: Evidence Provided by Papyri and Defixiones. In A. Mastrocinque, J. E. Sanzo & M. Scapini (Eds.), Ancient Magic. Then and Now (pp. 211-232). Franz Steiner Verlag.
  • Steiner, D. (1994). The Tyrant’s Writ. Myths and Images of Writing in Ancient Greece. Princeton University Press.
  • Tourraix, A. (1976). La femme et le pouvoir chez Hérodote. Essai d’histoire des mentalités antiques. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, 2, 369-386. https://doi.org/10.3406/dha.1976.2920
  • Varias, C. (1998). La venjança del pare davant els tribunals en el Contra la madrastra d’Antifont. Faventia, 20(2), 27-31.
  • Vasunia, P. (2001). The Gift of the Nile: Hellenizing Egypt from Aeschylus to Alexander. University of California Press.
  • Wesselmann, K. (2011). Mythische Erzählstrukturen in Herodots Historien. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239669
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet