Anthropomorphized vs objectified brandswhich brand version is more loved?

  1. Elena Delgado-Ballester 1
  2. Mariola Palazón 1
  3. Jenny Peláez 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
Aldizkaria:
European journal of management and business economics

ISSN: 2444-8494,  2444-8451

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Alea: 29

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 150-165

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1108/EJMBE-04-2019-0063 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: European journal of management and business economics

Laburpena

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to deal with the role of the human metaphor (anthropomorphism) and consumers’ liking for the humanized version of the brand as antecedents of three key components of brand love: self-brand integration, positive emotional connection and feelings of anticipated separation distress. Design/methodology/approach – A sample of 399 consumers provided information about a brand from a stated list of 16 brands of clothing. Findings – Both anthropomorphism and consumers’ liking for the humanized brand have positive effects on specific components of brand love. The results confirm that brand anthropomorphism is only desirable when the humanized version of the brand is attractive for consumers. Research limitations/implications – A potential shortcoming is the qualitative technique employed to observe anthropomorphic thought. Collecting ratings of anthropomorphic and non-anthropomorphic traits could be viewed as a method more easily applied in market research surveys. Practical implications – Managers have to control how consumers imagine the brand as a human entity because it affects brand love. For example, by tracking consumers’ opinions and traits of those people associated with the brand and brand user stereotypes can condition consumers’ imagination of the humanized brand. Originality/value – Compared to the limited number of studies about the relationship between anthropomorphism and brand love, this study focuses on the effects of anthropomorphism as a process, and not as a personal trait, on brand love. It also relies on consumers’ imagination instead of brand personification strategies to stimulate anthropomorphism

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aggarwal, P. and McGill, A.L. (2007), “Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 468-479.
  • Aggarwal, P. and McGill, A.L. (2012), “When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioural priming effects of brand anthropomorphism”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 307-323.
  • Ahuvia, A.C., Bagozzi, R.P. and Batra, R. (2014), “Psychometric vs. C-OAR-SE measures of brand love: a reply to Rossiter”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 235-243.
  • Ahuvia, A.C., Batra, R. and Bagozzi, R.P. (2009), “Love, desire, and identity: a conditional integration theory of the love of things”, in MacInnis, D.J., Park, C.W. and Priester, J.R. (Eds), The Handbook of Brand Relationships, ME Sharpe, New York, NY, pp. 342-357.
  • Albert, N. and Merunka, D. (2013), “The role of brand love in consumer–brand relationships”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 258-266.
  • Albert, N., Merunka, D. and Valette-Florence, P. (2008), “When consumers love their brands: exploring the concept and its dimensions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61 No. 10, pp. 1062-1075.
  • Anselmsson, J., Johansson, U. and Persson, N. (2008), “The battle of brands in the Swedish market for consumer packaged food: a cross-category examination of brand preference and liking”, Brand Management, Vol. 16 Nos 1-2, pp. 63-79.
  • Bairrada, C.M., Coelho, F. and Coelho, A. (2018), “Antecedents and outcomes of brand love: utilitarian and symbolic brand qualities”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52 Nos 3/4, pp. 656-682.
  • Batra, R., Ahuvia, A. and Bagozzi, R.P. (2012), “Brand love”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 1-16.
  • Bıçakcıoğlu, N., İpek, İ. and Bayraktaroğlu, G. (2018), “Antecedents and outcomes of brand love: the mediating role of brand loyalty”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 863-877.
  • Carroll, B.A. and Ahuvia, A.C. (2006), “Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 79-89.
  • Chandler, J. and Schwarz, N. (2010), “Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 138-145.
  • Chen, M. and Bargh, J.A. (1999), “Consequences of automatic evaluation: immediate behavioural predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 215-224.
  • Chen, R.P., Wan, E.W. and Levy, E. (2017), “The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 23-34.
  • Cohen, J. (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  • Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E.F. and Phillips, B.J. (2011), “Personification in advertising: using a visual metaphor to trigger anthropomorphism”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 121-130.
  • Delgado-Ballester, E. and Fernandez-Sabiote, E. (2016), “Once upon a brand: storytelling practices by Spanish brands”, Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 115-131.
  • Epley, N., Waytz, A. and Cacioppo, J.T. (2007), “On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism”, Psychological Review, Vol. 114 No. 4, pp. 864-886.
  • Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S. and Cacioppo, J.T. (2008), “When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism”, Social Cognition, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 143-155.
  • Escalas, E. and Bettman, J.R. (2005), “Self-construal, reference groups and brand meaning”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 378-389.
  • Fiske, S.T. (1982), “Schema-triggered affect: application to social perception”, in Clark, M.S. and Fiske, S.T. (Eds), The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundation of Social Behaviour, Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 167-203.
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50. 162
  • Fournier, S. (1998), “Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 343-373.
  • Fournier, S. and Alvarez, C. (2012), “Brands as relationship partners: warmth, competence and in-between”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 177-185.
  • Ghuman, M.K., Huang, L., Madden, T.J. and Roth, M.S. (2015), “Anthropomorphism and consumer–brand relationships: a cross-cultural analysis”, in Fournier, S., Breazeale, M. and Avery, J. (Eds), Strong Brand Relationships, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 135-148.
  • Hart, P.M., Jones, S.R. and Royne, M.B. (2013), “The human lens: how anthropomorphic reasoning varies by product complexity and enhances personal value”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 29 Nos 1-2, pp. 105-121.
  • Hegner, S.M., Fenko, A. and Teravest, A. (2017), “Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand brand love”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 26-41.
  • Huang, H.H. and Mitchell, V.W. (2014), “The role of imagination and brand personification in brand relationships”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 38-47.
  • Huber, F., Meyer, F. and Schmid, D.A. (2015), “Brand love in progress – the interdependence of brand love antecedents in consideration of relationship duration”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 567-579.
  • Ivens, B.S., Leischnig, A., Muller, B. and Valta, K. (2015), “Shaping consumer response toward brands: an empirical examination of direct and mediating effects of warmth and competence”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 808-820.
  • Karjaluoto, H., Munnukka, J. and Kiuru, K. (2016), “Brand love and positive word of mouth: the moderating effects of experience and price”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 527-537.
  • Kim, H.C. and Kramer, T. (2015), “Anthropomorphized brand roles and materialism on consumer responses”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 284-299.
  • Kwak, H., Puzakova, M. and Rocereto, J. (2013), “Better not smile at the price: the differential role of brand anthropomorphism on perceived price fairness”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 79 No. 4, pp. 56-76.
  • Kwak, H., Puzakova, M. and Rocereto, J. (2017), “When brand anthropomorphism alters perceptions of justice: the moderating role of self-construal”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 851-871.
  • Langner, T., Bruns, D., Fischer, A. and Rossiter, J.R. (2016), “Falling in love with brands: a dynamic analysis of the trajectories of brand love”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 15-26.
  • Lau, G.T. and Lee, S.H. (1999), “Consumers’ trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty”, Journal of Market-Focused Management, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 341-370.
  • Letheren, K., Kuhn, K.L., Lings, I. and Pope, N.K. (2016), “Individual difference factors related to anthropomorphic tendency”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50 Nos 5/6, pp. 973-1002.
  • Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G. and Widaman, K.F. (2002), “To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits”, Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 151-173.
  • Lott, A.J. and Lott, B.E. (1972), “The power of liking: consequences of interpersonal attitudes derived from a liberalized view of secondary reinforcement”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6, pp. 109-148.
  • MacInnis, D.J. and Folkes, V.S. (2017), “Humanizing brands: when brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 355-374.
  • Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W.D. and Nyffenegger, B. (2011), “Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: the relative importance of the actual and the ideal self”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 35-52.
  • Palusuk, N., Koles, B. and Hasan, R. (2019), “ ‘All you need is brand love’: a critical review and comprehensive conceptual framework for brand love”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 35 Nos 1-2, pp. 97-129. 163 Effect of anthropomorphism on brand love
  • Puzakova, M. and Aggarwal, P. (2018), “Brands as rivals: consumer pursuit of distinctiveness and the role of brand anthropomorphism”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 869-888.
  • Puzakova, M., Kwak, H. and Rocereto, J.F. (2013a), “When humanizing brands goes wrong: the detrimental effect of brand anthropomorphization amid product wrongdoings”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 77 No. 3, pp. 81-100.
  • Puzakova, M., Rocereto, J. and Kwak, H. (2013b), “Ads are watching me: a view from the interplay between anthropomorphism and customization”, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 513-538.
  • Rauschnabel, P. and Ahuvia, A. (2014), “You are so loveable: anthropomorphism and brand love”, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 372-395.
  • Rauschnabel, P., Ahuvia, A., Björn, I. and Leischnig, A. (2013), “Who loves brands? Exploring the relationships between personality, interpersonal love and brand love”, 42nd Annual Conference EMAC, Istanbul, June 4-7.
  • Reimann, M. and Aron, A. (2009), “Self-expansion motivation and inclusion of brand in the self: towards a theory of brand relationships”, in MacInnis, D.J., Park, C.W. and Priester, J.R. (Eds), Handbook of Brand Relationships, ME Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp. 65-81.
  • Reimann, M., Castaño, R., Zaichkowsky, J. and Bechara, A. (2012), “How we relate to brands: psychological and neurophysiological insights into consumer–brand relationships”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 128-142.
  • Rivits-Arkonsuo, L. and Leppiman, A. (2015), “Young consumers and their brand love”, International Journal of Business and Social Research, Vol. 5 No. 10, pp. 3-44.
  • Roy, P., Khandeparkar, K. and Motiani, M. (2016), “A lovable personality: the effect of brand personality on brand love”, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 97-113.
  • Schoefer, K. and Ennew, C. (2005), “The impact of perceived justice on consumers’ emotional responses to service complaint experiences”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 261-270.
  • Srull, T.K. and Wyer, R.S. (1989), “Person memory and judgment”, Psychological Review, Vol. 96 No. 1, pp. 58-83.
  • Sweeney, J.C. and Brandon, C. (2006), “Brand personality: exploring the potential to move from factor analytical to circumplex models”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 639-663.
  • Thomson, M., MacInnis, D.J. and Park, C.W. (2005),“The ties that bind: measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 77-91.
  • Tuškej, U. and Podnar, K. (2018), “Consumers’ identification with corporate brands: brand prestige, anthropomorphism and engagement in social media”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 3-17.
  • van Esch, P., Arli, D., Gheshlaghi, M.H., Andonopoulos, V., von der Heidt, T. and Northey, G. (2019), “Anthropomorphism and augmented reality in the retail environment”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 49, July, pp. 35-42.
  • Vernuccio, M., Pagani, M., Barbarossa, C. and Pastore, A. (2015), “Antecedents of brand love in online network-based communities. A social identity perspective”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 706-719.
  • Wallace, E., Buil, I. and de Chernatony, L. (2014), “Consumer engagement with self-expressive brands: brand love and WOM outcomes”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 33-42.
  • Wallace, E., Buil, I. and de Chernatony, L. (2017), “Consumers’ self-congruence with a ‘liked’ brand: cognitive network influence and brand outcomes”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 367-390.
  • Wang, L.C., Baker, J., Wagner, J.A. and Wakefield, K. (2007), “Can a retail website be social?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 143-157.
  • Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. and Epley, N. (2010), “Who sees human? The importance and stability of individual difference in anthropomorphism”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 219-232.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet