Un retorno inevitable al concepto de pobreza en España en tiempos de confinamiento por el COVID-19.

  1. Mª Dolores Gracia Ortiz
  2. María Teresa Tornel Marín
  3. José Manuel Santos Jaén
Aldizkaria:
La Razón histórica: revista hispanoamericana de historia de las ideas políticas y sociales

ISSN: 1989-2659

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Zenbakien izenburua: LA CRISIS DEL CORONAVIRUS EDICIÓN ESPECIAL PRIMAVERA 2020

Zenbakia: 46

Orrialdeak: 63-76

Mota: Artikulua

Beste argitalpen batzuk: La Razón histórica: revista hispanoamericana de historia de las ideas políticas y sociales

Laburpena

This paper intends to analyse the exceptional situation that Spain is currently going through. Such a scenario has been created by the Alarm State caused by the COVID19. The situation, while making us have a rethink about the basic assumptions of social intervention in favour of defending social protection in our country forces us, at the same time, to make an epistemic turn in the theoretical assumptions related to the concepts of vulnerability, marginalization, exclusion or poverty. Throughout the present paper, a theoretical analysis of such assumptions is intended, to end up with the characteristics of the demands posed by the current scenario of coninement of citizens, the possible models of intervention, the social protection network that is offered to us with regard to the above mentioned intervention processes and the response options of the professionals belonging to the Spanish Social Services system. However, this paper is a hurried attempt to show feelings, to invite relection, a story -perhaps a biased one- of the perception of the reality around us. Still, this invitation has been considered to be interesting and therefore, the present paper has been written.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Baratz, M. S., & Grigsby, W. G. (1972). Thoughts on poverty and its elimination. Journal of Social Policy, 1(2), 119–134.
  • Castel, R. (1995). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale. Une chronique du salariat, Paris, Fayard. CAHIERS DU CRISES–. COLLECTION WORKING PAPERS.
  • Fields, G. S., & Bourguignon, F. (1997). Discontinuous losses from poverty, generalized Pα measures, and optimal transfers to the poor.
  • Gradín, C., Del Rio, C., & Cantó, O. (2005). Aspectos conceptuales en la medición de la desigualdad y la pobreza económica. Marginados y Excluidos: Un Enfoque Interdisciplinar, 16, 59.
  • Marx, K. (2015). Capital: A critique of political economy, Volume 1. Arkose Press.
  • PNUD. (2000). Informe sobre desarrollo humano (E. Mundi-Prensa (ed.)).
  • Robles, M. (2008). Principales aportaciones teóricas sobre la pobreza. Contribuciones a Las Ciencias Sociales, 2008–07.
  • Sen, A. (1992). Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Primera edición ed. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Sen, Amartya. (1985). A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: a reply to Professor Peter Townsend. Oxford Economic Papers, 37(4), 669–676.
  • Sen, Amartya. (1992). Sobre conceptos y medidas de pobreza. Comercio Exterior, 42(4), 310–322.
  • Smith, A. (1776). Wealth of Nations.
  • Spiker, P. (2007). Definition of Poverty: Twelve Cluster Meanings. Spiker, Paul.
  • Subirats, J., Riba, C., Giménez, L., Obradors, A., Giménez, M., Queralt, D., Bottos, P., &
  • Rapoport, A. (2004). Pobreza y exclusión social. Un Análisis de La Realidad Española y Europea. Barcelona: Fundación La Caixa.
  • Tellaeche, A. I. (1990). Trabajo Social y Servicios Sociales: Aportes para una clarificación necesaria. Documentación Social, 79, 49–64.
  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living. Univ of California Press