Family and cultural capitalthe perspective of familiness

  1. Ortiz García, Pilar 1
  2. Olaz Capitán, Ángel 1
  3. Monreal Martínez, Juan 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Revista de Empresa Familiar

ISSN: 2174-2529

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 4

Número: 2

Páginas: 47-59

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V4I2.5051 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Empresa Familiar

Resumen

La influencia de la familia en la empresa, su compromiso con el negocio y los valores que transmite, forman un capital capaz de influir en el desarrollo global del proyecto empresarial. En esta investigación se analiza este capital familiar y concretamente los componentes culturales de éste como un recurso para orientar la acción en la empresa. La cultura organizativa, como filosofía orientadora de la estrategia de la empresa familiar, constituye un factor clave de su éxito. En definitiva, el capital cultural de la empresa familiar es una capacidad en términos de empowerment. El hecho de compartir valores, una definición compartida de la misión empresarial y unas creencias que ejerzan como elementos de cohesión entre sus recursos humanos, son un elemento competitivo. De lo que se trata, es de conocer cómo determina los resultados empresariales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ansoff, H. (1985). La dirección y su actitud ante el entorno. Bilbao: Deusto.
  • Aronof, C. (2004). Self perpetuation family organization built on values: Necessary condition for long term family business survival. Family Business Review, 17(1), 55-59.
  • Astrachan, J., Klien, S. and Smyrnios, K. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45-58.
  • Baars, J. et al. (1997). Conclusion: Towards Social Quality in Europe. In Beck W. et al. (Eds.), Social Qualily: A Vision for Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  • Beck, W. et al. (2001). Processes challenging the concept of social quality. In Beck, W. et al. (Eds.): Social Qualily: A Vision for Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  • Belorgey, J.M. (1993). Évaluer les Politiques de la Ville. Paris: Comité d´Évaluation de la Politique de la Ville.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 95- 120.
  • De Val Pardo, I. (1989). Estructura de organización de la empresa pública y la privada. Papeles de Economía Española, 39-40, 116-131.
  • Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504-1513.
  • Dyer, W.G. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • European Comission (1996). Human & Social Development (HSD). Working paper from the Commision, Part III, EU Policy priorities for HSD, 2, 06/95-11/97 (Brussels, DGV).
  • Freytag, A. and Thurik, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross country setting. J. Evol. Econ. 17, 117-131.
  • Friedman, J. (1992). Empowerment. The politics of alternative development. Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • Gallo, M.A. (1995). Empresa Familiar. Texto y Casos. Madrid: Editorial PRAXIS, S.A.
  • García, E. and López, L. (2001). A taxonomy of founders based on values: The root of family business heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14(3), 209-230.
  • Garmendia, J.A. y Parra, F. (1993). Sociología industrial y de los recursos humanos. Madrid: Taurus.
  • Garmendia, J.A. (2004). Impacto de la cultura en los resultados de la organización. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 108, 75-96.
  • Graf, F.W. (1999). Soziales Kapital in der Bürgergesellschaft. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
  • Habbershon, T., Williams, M. and Mcmillan, I. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-565.
  • Hall, P.D. (1988). A historical overview of family firms in the United States. Family Business Review, 1(1), 51-68.
  • Handy, C. 1978). Gods of management: The changing work of organizations. USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Hienerth, C. & Kessler, A. (2006). Measuring success in family businesses: The concept of configurational fit. Family Business Review, 19, 115-134.
  • Hoffman J., Hoelscher M. and Sorenson R. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: a family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19(2), 135-145.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organisations across Nations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Infestas, A. (1991). Sociología de la Empresa. Salamanca: Amarú.
  • Kaarst-Brown, M.L., Nicholson, S., Von Dran, G.M. & Stanton, J.M. (2004). Organizational culture of libraries as a strategic resource. Library Trends, 53(1), 33-53.
  • Kotter, J.P. and Heskett, J.L. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: Free Press. Lansberg, I. (1983). Managing Human Resources in Family Firms: The Problem of Institutional Overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 39-46.
  • Le Breton-Miller, I. and Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. Stewardship in public family firms. A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1.169-1.191.
  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I. and Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non-Family Businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 50-78.
  • Nohria, N., Joyce, W. and Roberson, B. (2003). What Really Works. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 42-52.
  • Olson, P. et al. (2003). Impact of family and business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 639-666.
  • Ouchi, W. 1982). Teoría Z. Barcelona: Orbis.
  • Pascale, R. and Athos, A. (1983). El secreto de la técnica empresarial japonesa. Barcelona: Grijalbo.
  • Pearson, A., Carr, J. and Shaw, J. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship and Practice, 32(6), 949-969.
  • Peters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H. (1982). In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
  • Pümpin, C. et García Echevarría, S. (1988). Cultura Empresarial. Madrid: Ed. Díaz de Santos.
  • Sciascia, S. and Mazzola, P. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management: exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21(4), 331-345.
  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J.J., et Chua, J.H. (1997). Strategic management of family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1), 1- 35.
  • Sharma, P. (2004). An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1-35.
  • Schein, E. (1998). Cultura organizacional y liderazgo. Una visión dinámica. Barcelona: Plaza y Janés.
  • Svetlik, I. (2000). Some conceptual and operational considerations on the Social Quality of Europe. European Journal of Social Quality, 1, 1/2.
  • Thevenet, M. (1992). Auditoría de la cultura empresarial. Madrid: Díaz de Santos.
  • Ward, J.L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. How to plan for continuing growth, profitability and family leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Zahra, S.A., Hayton, J.C. and Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in Family vs. Non-Family Firms: A Resource-Based Analysis of the Effect of Organizational Culture. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28, 363- 381.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet