Revisión sistemática del apoyo a la autonomía en educación física

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Abós, A., Sevil, J., Sanz, M., Aibar, A., & García-González, L. (2015). Autonomy support in physical education as a means of preventing student’s oppositional defiance. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 12(43), 65-78. doi:10.5232/ricyde2016.04304
• Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers’ beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(6), 595-609. doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0229
• Aibar, A., Estrada, S., Murillo, B., Clemente, J., Antonio, J., Bois, J., & García González, L. (2015). Actividad física y apoyo de la autonomía. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 24(1), 155-161.
• Álvarez, M. S., Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., & Duda, J. L. (2009). Coach autonomy support and quality of sport engagement in young soccer players. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 138-148. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600001554
• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
• Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., Cuevas, R., & Atienza, F. (2018). The importance of coaches’ autonomy support in the leisure experience and well-being of young footballers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00840
• Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., & Duda, J. L. (2008). Apoyo a la autonomía, satisfacción de las necesidades, motivación y bienestar en deportistas de competición: un análisis de la teoría de la autodeterminación. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 17(1), 123-139.
• Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1988). Teacher as social context: A measure of student perceptions of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support (Tech. Rep. No. 102). University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
• Castillo, I., Balaguer, I., & García-Mérita, M. (2007). Efecto de la práctica de actividad física y de la participación deportiva sobre el estilo de vida saludable en la adolescencia en función del género. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 16, 201-210.
• Chang, Y. K., Chen, S., Tu, K. W., & Chi, L. K. (2016). Effect of autonomy support on self-determined motivation in elementary physical education. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 15(3), 460-466.
• Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Hagger M. S. (2009) Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisuretime physical activity participation. Psychology and Health, 24(1), 29-48. doi:10.1080/08870440701809533
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 365-396. doi:10.1123/jsep.34.3.365
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., & Jang, H. R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 331- 346. doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0231
• Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99-111. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004
• De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Van Petegem, S., & Haerens, L. (2016). Do students with different motives for physical education respond differently to autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 72-82. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.001
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. New York: The University of Rochester Press.
• Escriva-Boulley, G., Tessier, D., Ntoumanis, N., & Sarrazin, P. (2018). Need-supportive professional development in elementary school physical education: Effects of a cluster-randomized control trial on teachers’ motivating style and student physical activity. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(2), 218-234. doi:10.1037/spy0000119
• Godin, G., & Shephard, R. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10(3), 141-146.
• González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Beas-Jiménez, M., & Hagger, M. S. (2014). Broadening the trans-contextual model of motivation: A study with Spanish adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 24(4), 306-319. doi:10.1111/sms.12142
• González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., & Moreno-Murcia, J. A. (2011). Un estudio cuasi-experimental de los efectos del clima motivador tarea en las clases de educación física. Revista de Educación, 356, 677-700.
• Gustavsson, P., Jirwe, M., Aurell, J., Miller, E., & Rudman, A. (2016). Autonomy-supportive interventions in schools: A review. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.
• Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16(3), 26-36. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
• Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soós, I., & Karsai, I. (2007). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 632–653. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.09.001
• Leptokaridou, E., Vlachopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, A. (2014). Experimental longitudinal test of the influence of autonomy-supportive teaching on motivation for participation in elementary school physical education. Educational Psychology, 36(7), 1138-1159. doi:10.10 80/01443410.2014.950195
• Ledent, M., Cloes, M. & Piéron, M. (1997). Les jeunes, leur activité physique et leurs perceptions de la sante, de la forme, des capacités athlétiques et de l’apparence. Sport, 40, 90-95.
• Lim, B., & Wang, C. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioural regulations in physical education and physical activity intention.Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 52-60. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.003
• Lochbaum, M., & Jean-Noel, J. (2016). Perceived autonomy-support instruction and student outcomes in physical education and leisuretime: A meta-analytic review of correlates. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 43(12), 29-47. doi:10.5232/ricyde2016.04302
• Mars, L., Castillo, I, López-Walle, J., & Balaguer, I. (2017). Estilo controlador del entrenador, frustración de las necesidades y malestar en futbolistas. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 26(2), 119-124.
• McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48-58. doi:10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
• Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Cervelló, E., Montero, C., Vera, J. A., & García-Calvo, T. (2012). Metas sociales, necesidades psicológicas básicas y motivación intrínseca como predictores de la percepción del esfuerzo en las clases de educación física. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 21, 215-221.
• Moreno-Murcia, J. A., & Sánchez-Latorre, F. (2016). The effects of autonomy support in physical education classes. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 43(12), 79-89. doi:10.5232/ricyde2016.04305
• Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Pintado, R., Huéscar, E., & Marzo, J. C. (2018). Estilo interpersonal controlador y su percepción de competencia en educación superior. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 11(1), 33-45. doi:10.30552/ejep.v11i1.184
• Ng, J., Ntoumanis, N., Ntoumanis, C., Deci, E., Ryan, R., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340. doi:10.1177/1745691612447309
• Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444-453. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.444
• Perlman, D. (2011). The influence of an autonomy-supportive intervention on preservice teacher instruction: A self-determined perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(11), 73-79.
• Perlman, D. (2015). Assisting preservice teachers toward more motivationally supportive instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(1), 119-130. doi:10.1123/jtpe.2013-0208
• Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., & Wang, C. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomysupportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93-110. doi:0.1007/s11031-013-9367-0
• Röder, B., & Kleine, D. (2007). Selbstbestimmung/Autonomie. En Skalendokumentation zum Forschungsprojekt “Selbstwirksamkeit und Selbstbestimmung im Unterricht”. Recuperado de https://www. erziehungswissenschaften.hu-berlin.de/de/paedpsych/forschung/ Skalenbuch_FoSS.pdf
• Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
• Sarrazin, P. G., Tessier, D. P., Pelletier, L. G., Trouilloud, D. O., & Chanal, J. P. (2006). The effects of teachers’ expectations about students’ motivation on teachers’ autonomy-supportive and controlling behaviors. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 283-301. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2006.9671799
• Skinner, E., & Edge, K. (2002). Self-determination, coping, and development. En E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 297-337). Rochester, NY, US: University of Rochester Press.
• Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). Students’ motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: A self-theory approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77,100-110. doi:10.1080/02701367.2006.10599336
• Taylor, I., Ntoumanis, N., Standage, M., & Spray, C. (2010). Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: A multilevel linear growth analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(1), 99-120. doi:10.1123/jsep.32.1.99
• Thomas, J. R., & Nelson, J.K. (2007). Métodos de investigación en actividad física. Barcelona: Paidotribo.
• Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Michailidou, S. (2006). Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10, 179- 201. doi:10.1207/s15327841mpee1003_4
• Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 115–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115
• Yew, M., & Wang, K. (2016). The effectiveness of an autonomy-supportive teaching structure in physical education. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 12(43), 5-28. doi:10.5232/ricyde2016.04301
• Zapatero J. A., González, M. D., & Campos, A. (2018). El modelo competencial en educación física: contribución, evaluación y vinculación con sus contenidos. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 13(37), 17-30. doi:10.12800/ccd.v13i37.1035