El control social como elemento imprescindible para el éxito de la lucha contra la corrupciónalgunas reflexiones a partir del caso español

Referencias bibliográficas

• ACEMOGLU, D. y ROBINSON, J.A. (2012), Por qué fracasan los países, Barcelona: Deusto.
• CHARRON, N. y LAPUENTE, V. (2011), ‘Why do some regions in Europe have higher quality of government?’, QoG Working Paper Series 2011:1.
• GARCÍA-QUESADA, M., JIMÉNEZ, F. y VILLORIA, M. (2015), “Can´t control/won’t control: opportunities and deterrents for local urban corruption in Lanzarote”, Crime, law and social change, 63(1): 1-20. (DOI 10.1007/ s10611-014-9549-z).
• ICHINO, A. y MAGGI, G. (1999), “Work Environment and Individual Background: Explaining Regional Shirking Differentials in a Large Italian Firm”, NBER Working Papers, 7415.
• IXTACUY, L., PRIETO, J. y WILLS, M. (2015), Anti-Corruption Revolutions: When Civil Society Steps In. European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building. ERCAS Working Paper No. 44.
• JIMÉNEZ, F. (2007), “El impacto de la corrupción en la democracia”, en Estefanía, J. ed., Informe sobre la democracia en España/2007, Fundación Alternativas: Madrid, pp. 201-229. Se puede consultar on-line en: http://www.falternativas.org/laboratorio/libros-e-informes
• KITSCHELT, H. y WILKINSON, S. (2006), Patrons, Clients and Policies. Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• KLITGAARD, R. (1988), Controlling Corruption, Berkeley: University of California Press.
• KLITGAARD, R. (2000), Corrupt Cities. A Practical Guide to Cure and Prevention, ICS Press and World Bank Institute, Oakland, CA. and Washington, DC.
• KRISHNA, A. (2007), “Politics in the middle: mediating relationships between the citizens and the state in rural North India”, en Kitschelt, H. y Wilkinson, S. eds., Patrons, Clients and Policies. Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• LICHT, A.N, GOLDSMITH, C. y SCHWARTZ, S.H. (2005), “Culture, law, and corporate governance”, International Review of Law and Economics, 25: 229-255.
• MCNEIL, M. y MALENA, C. (2010), Demanding Good Governance: Lessons from Social Accountability Initiatives in Africa, Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
• MÜLLER, W. C. (2007), “Political institutions and linkage strategies”, en Kitschelt, H. y Wilkinson, S., eds., Patrons, Clients and Policies. Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• MUNGIU-PIPPIDI, A. (2006), “Corruption: diagnosis and treatment”, Journal of Democracy, 17 (3): 86-99.
• MUNGIU-PIPPIDI, A. (2013), ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Controlling corruption in the European Union’, Advanced Policy Paper for Discussion in the European Parliament. Disponible online en: http://www.againstcorruption.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ANTICORRP-Policy-Paper-onLessons-Learnt-fi nal.pdf
• PERSSON, A., ROTHSTEIN B. y TEORELL, J. (2013), “Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail. Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem”, Governance 26(3): 449-471.
• RILEY, S. P. (1998), “The political economy of anticorruption strategies in Africa”, European Journal of Development Research, 10 (1): 129-159.
• ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. (1978), Corruption: A Study in Political Economy, Nueva York: Academic Press.
• ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. (2000), “Is leaner government necessarily cleaner government?”, en Tulchin, J. y Espach, R., eds., Combating corruption in Latin America, Washington DC: W. Wilson Center Press, 87-104.
• ROTHSTEIN, B. (2011), The Quality of Government, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• ROTHSTEIN, B. y USLANER, E. (2005), “All for all: equality, corruption and social trust”, World Politics, 58 (1): 41-72.
• TABELLINI, G. (2005), “Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the Regions of Europe”, CESifo Working Paper Series, 1492.
• TABELLINI, G. (2007), “Institutions and culture”, IGIER Working Paper Series, 330.
• TEORELL, J. y ROTHSTEIN, B. (2012), “Getting to Sweden. Malfeasance and bureaucratic reforms 1720-1850”, QoG Working Paper Series 2012:18.
• TORCAL, M. (2014), “The Decline of Political Trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic Performance or Political Responsiveness?”, American Behavioral Scientist, 58 (12): 1542-1567.
• VANUCCI, A. (2009), “The Controversial Legacy of ‘Mani Pulite’: A Critical Analysis of Italian Corruption and Anti-Corruption Policies”, Bulletin of Italian Politics. 1(2): 233-64.
• WILKINSON, S. (2007), “Explaining changing patterns of party-voter linkages in India”, en Kitschelt, H. y Wilkinson, S., eds., Patrons, Clients and Policies. Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.