Dos experiencias de aplicación del nexo investigación-docencia en ciencias socialesla perspectiva del docente universitario

  1. Cámara, Antonio D. 1
  2. Barros Rodríguez, Francisco 1
  3. Martínez Carrión, José Miguel 2
  4. Candela Martínez, Begoña 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

ISSN: 1988-9046

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 2

Páginas: 68-91

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17561//REE.V2019N2.4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

Resumen

The methodological model known as research-teaching nexus can be considered as an strategic factor for the learning process at university in at least three different ways, namely: 1) in terms of scientific and academic productivity and competitiveness at the institutional level; 2) in terms of individual training addressed to the successful integration in labor markets which are increasingly competitive and 3) for the improvement of the efficiency on project planning and resource management in both the public and the private sectors. Under any of the former perspectives, it is apparent the potential contribution of interactive- and experimental-guided teaching in transferring prominence to students during the attainment of a number of abilities and competences. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss two cases inspired by this type of teaching methodologies. These experiences are carried out in subjects of Social Sciences degrees at the Universities of Jaen and Murcia (Spain).  Around these experiences some tools applied over diverse stages of the learning program and with diverse objectives are commented, namely: foundations for diagnose base on research problem solving, practical understanding of concepts, data collection-generation techniques, and means of presentation and dissemination of research findings. The main constraints and handicaps that students have to face during the development of their projects are commented as well. Finally, some learning outcomes attained together with some difficulties that were found over the application of this methodology and the advances on the targeted competences are discussed. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss two cases inspired by these type of teaching methodologies. These experiences are carried out in subjects of Social Sciences degrees at the Universities of Jaen and Murcia (Spain). Around these experiences some tools applied over diverse stages of the learning program and with diverse objectives are commented, namely: foundations for diagnose base on research problem solving, practical understanding of concepts, data collection-generation techniques, and means of presentation and dissemination of research findings. The main constraints and handicaps that students have to face during the development of their projects are commented as well. Finally, some learning outcomes attained together with some difficulties that were found over the application of this methodology and the advances on the targeted competences are discussed.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barczyk, C. (2013): “Facebook in higher education courses: an analysis of students' attitudes, community of practice, and classroom community”, International Business and Management, vol. 6, nº 1, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.ibm.1923842820130601.1165.
  • Bauman, Z. (2000): Liquid Modernity, Polity, Cambridge.
  • Bavdekar, S. B., Vyas, S., & Anand, V. (2018): “Creating Posters for Effective Scientific Communication”, Journal of The Association of Physicians of India, vol. 65, nº 8, pp. 82-88.
  • Beck, U. (1992): Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.
  • Böttcher, F., & Thiel, F. (2018): “Evaluating research-oriented teaching: a new instrument to assess university students’ research competences”, Higher Education, vol. 75, nº 1, pp. 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0128-y.
  • Brew, A. (2003): “Teaching and Research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education”, Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 22, nº 1, pp. 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000056571
  • Brew, A. (2006): Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide (Universities into the 21st Century), Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • Brew, A. (2010): “Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research”, Higher Education Research & Development, vol 29, nº 2, pp. 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903552451.
  • Brew, A. (2013): “Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: a framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making”, Higher Education, vol. 66, nº 5, pp. 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9624-x.
  • Brunet, I., Belzunegui, A., & Pastor, I. (2011): Sociología de las Organizaciones, Ed. Universitas, Madrid.
  • Carbonell, J. (2015): Pedagogías del siglo XXI, alternativas para la innovación educativa, Ed. Octaedro, Barcelona.
  • Castells, M. (2006): La sociedad red: una visión global, Alianza, Madrid.
  • Díaz-Barriga, F. (2006): Enseñanza situada: vínculo entre la escuela y la vida, McGraw-Hill, México.
  • Elton, L. (2001): “Research and Teaching: Conditions for a positive link”, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 6, nº 1, pp. 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029590.
  • Fernández, J. A. (2017): Enseñar desde el cerebro del que aprende, Ed. Mayéutica, Madrid.
  • Galbraith, C. S., & Merrill, G. B. (2012): “Faculty Research Productivity and Standardized Student Learning Outcomes in a University Teaching Environment: A Bayesian Analysis of Relationships”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 37, nº 4, pp. 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.523782.
  • Glen, R., Suciu, C., & Baughn, C. (2014): “The need for design thinking in business schools”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 13, nº 4, pp. 653-667. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0308.
  • González, C., Guzmán, C., & Montenegro, H. (2016): “El vínculo docencia-investigación en programas de pregrado: estado del arte y propuestas para fortalecerlo”, Revista de Pedagogía, vol. 37, nº 101, pp. 193-213.
  • Griffin, K. (2001): “Desarrollo humano: origen, evolución e impacto”. En P. Ibarra y K. Unceta (coords.), Ensayos sobre el desarrollo humano, Icaria, Barcelona, pp. 25-40.
  • Griffiths, R. (2004): “Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 29, nº 6, pp. 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287212.
  • Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2015): “Confirmation of campus-class-technology model in student engagement: a path analysis”, Computers in Human Behavior, nº 48, pp. 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.041.
  • Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., & Barnett, R. (2013): “Academic Fragilities in a Marketised Age: The Case of Chile”, British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 61, nº 2, pp. 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.776006.
  • Healey, M. (2005a): “Linking research and teaching: exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning”. En R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp. 67-78.
  • Healey, M. (2005b): “Linking Research and Teaching to Benefit Student Learning”, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol. 29, nº 2, pp. 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130387.
  • Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Zetter, R. (2007): Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments, The Higher Education Academy, York.
  • Healey, M., Jordan, F., Pell, B., & Short, C. (2010): “The research-teaching nexus: A case study of students’ awareness, experience and perceptions of research”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 47, nº 2, pp. 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703291003718968.
  • Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010): “Educational use of social networking technology in higher education”, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 15, nº 6, pp. 703-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507307.
  • Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007): “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development”, Science Education, vol. 91, nº 1, pp. 36-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173.
  • Hutchings, W. (2007a): Enquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and Rationale, Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning, The University of Manchester, Manchester. Recuperado el 29 de marzo de 2019, de https://bit.ly/35l9QCJ.
  • Hutchings, W. (2007b): The philosophical bases of Enquiry-Based Learning, Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning, The University of Manchester, Manchester. Recuperado el 10 de julio de 2019, de https://bit.ly/2XwVWeb.
  • Ivala, E., & Gachago, D. (2012): “Social media for enhancing student engagement: the use of Facebook and blogs at a university of technology”, South African Journal of Higher Education, vol. 26, nº 1, pp. 152-167. https://doi.org/10.20853/26-1-156.
  • Jenkins, A., Blackman, T., Lindsay, R., & Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1998): “Teaching and Research: Student Perspectives and Policy Implications”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 23, nº 2, pp. 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380344.
  • Jensen, J. (1988): “Research and Teaching in the Universities of Denmark: does such an interplay really exist?”, Higher Education, nº 17, pp. 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130897.
  • Lacey, A., & Murray, C. (2015): Rethinking the Regulatory Environment of Competency-Based Education, AEI Series on Competency-Based Higher Education, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington.
  • Lage, M. J., & Platt, G. (2000): “The Internet and the Inverted Classroom”, Journal of Economic Education, nº 31(1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596756.
  • Lee, J. S., Blackwell, S., Drake, J., & Moran, K. A. (2014): “Taking a leap of faith: Redefining teaching and learning in higher education through project-based learning”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 8, nº 2, pp. 19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1426.
  • Levin, B. (2011): “Mobilizing research knowledge in education”, London Review of Education, vol. 9, nº 1, pp. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2011.550431.
  • Levin, B. (2013): “To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use”, Review of Education, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 2-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3001.
  • Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012): “How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning?”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 37, nº 1, pp. 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.499166.
  • Martín, G., & Barba, J. (2016): “¿Qué es la innovación docente? Un cambio en las practicas o de pensamiento docente”, EmásF: revista digital de educación física, nº 38, pp. 7-17.
  • McCarthy, J. (2010): “Blended learning environments: using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience”, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 26, nº 6, pp. 729-740. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1039.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011): Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Rights, Action, and Social Responsibility, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015): “The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review”, The Internet and Higher Education, nº 25, pp. 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002.
  • Olias de Lima, B. (2001): La Nueva Gestión Pública, Prentice Hall, Madrid.
  • Pan, W., Cotton, D., & Murray, P. (2014): “Linking research and teaching: context, conflict and complementarity”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 51, nº 1, pp. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.847794.
  • Piotrowski, C. (2015): “Pedagogical applications of social media in business education”. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol 43, nº 3, pp. 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515570575..
  • PNUD (1990): Desarrollo Humano. Informe 1990, Tercer Mundo Editores, Bogotá.
  • Pons, J., Bartolomé, M. I., & Sánchez, M. (2018): “La elaboración de pósteres científicos como actividad complementaria a través de la enseñanza virtual en la asignatura de Historia de las Relaciones Laborales”. En A. Molina de Dios et al. (eds.), Investigaciones en Historia Económica, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca.
  • Rossi, T. (2018): “How to design an award-winning conference poster”, LSE Impact Blog. Recuperado el 16 de marzo de 2019, de https://bit.ly/37gCDKx
  • Sánchez, E. M., Cebrián, M. M., & Botella, E. (2016): “Nuevas prácticas en historia económica: la elaboración y presentación de un póster académico”. En M. A. Bringas et al. (eds.), Nuevas perspectivas en la Investigación docente de la historia económica, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander.
  • Santos, M. L., Castejón, J., & Martínez, F. (2012): “La innovación docente en evaluación formativa y metodología participativa: Un proyecto compartido a raíz de la implantación de los nuevos grados”, Psychology, Society, & Education, vol. 4, nº 1, pp. 73-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/psye.v4i1.482.
  • Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. E. (2010): “Research‐led teaching: moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience”, Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 29, nº 6, pp. 641-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489236.
  • Sen, A. (1989): “Development as capability expansion”, Journal of Development Planning, vol. 19, nº 1, pp. 41-58.
  • Sen, A. (2005): “Human rights and capabilities”, Journal of Human Development, vol. 6, nº 2, pp. 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500120491.
  • Sheeran, N., & Cummings, D. J. (2018): “An examination of the relationship between Facebook groups attached to university courses and student engagement”, Higher Education, vol. 76, nº 6, pp. 937-955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0253-2.
  • Smyth, L., Davila, F., Sloan, T., Rykers, E., Backwell, S., & Jones, S. B. (2016): “How science really works: the student experience of research-led education”, Higher Education, vol. 72, nº 2, pp. 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9945-z.
  • Tadesse, T., & Gillies, R. M. (2015): “Nurturing cooperative learning pedagogies in higher education classrooms: evidence of instructional reform and potential challenges”, Current Issues in Education, vol. 18, nº 2. https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1374.
  • Tess, P. A. (2013): “The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual): a literature review”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, nº 5, pp. 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032.
  • Tuning Project. (2007): Tuning General Brochure, European Commission through the Socrates and Tempus programmes (of the Directorate-General for Education and Culture), Brussels.
  • UNESCO. (2002): Enhancing global sustainability, position paper and proposals by UNESCO, Preparatory Committee for the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), 3rd Session 25 March, New York.
  • Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., van der Rijst, R. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2016): “A questionnaire to capture students’ perceptions of research integration in their courses”, Higher Education, vol. 71, nº 4, pp. 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9918-2.
  • Yew, E. H., & Goh, K. (2016): “Problem-based learning: an overview of its process and impact on learning”, Health Professions Education, vol. 2, nº 2, pp. 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004.
  • Zamorski, B. (2002): “Research-led Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A case”, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 7, nº 4, pp. 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/135625102760553919.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet