Adaptación española de la versión reducida multicanal del Perfil de Sensibilidad No Verbal (MiniPONS)

  1. Martínez-Sánchez, Francisco
  2. García Fernández-Abascal, Enrique
  3. Martínez-Modia, Juan C.
Revue:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Année de publication: 2013

Volumen: 29

Número: 2

Pages: 604-613

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.29.2.161851 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Anales de psicología

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

En este trabajo se presenta la adaptación española de la versión reducida multicanal del Perfil de Sensibilidad No Verbal (MiniPONS) (Bänziger, Scherer, Hall y Rosenthal, 2011). Esta escala evalúa las diferen-cias individuales en la habilidad para reconocer emociones, actitudes inter-personales y comunicación de intenciones por canales no verbales. Esta versión multicanal reducida está compuesta por 64 estímulos no verbales de vídeo y/o audio que representan a una mujer en blanco y negro. El princi-pal objetivo de este estudio es analizar las propiedades psicométricas del MiniPONS empleando para ello una amplia muestra de participantes (N = 1154) de entre 18 a 60 años, también se examinaron las diferencias en la sensibilidad no verbal en función del sexo y la edad. Se presentan los valo-res normativos, la fiabilidad y validez en tres estudios con 168, 254 y 1154 estudiantes universitarios. Los resultados muestran que las mujeres obtie-nen mejores puntuaciones en todas las condiciones estimulares, éstas no sólo procesan más eficientemente información emocional no verbal por ca-nales unisensoriales (rostro, cuerpo, voz), si no que también la integran me-jor. Los resultados indican que la versión española del MiniPONS presenta unas propiedades psicométricas similares a la escala original, mostrando moderada consistencia interna y fiabilidad test-retest, así como también una razonable validez convergente obtenida en las correlaciones con otras pruebas que evalúan la capacidad de reconocimiento emocional. Se conclu-ye que la versión española del MiniPONS es un instrumento que evalúa adecuadamente la sensibilidad no verbal. Se discuten las limitaciones y po-tencial utilidad de la escala.

Références bibliographiques

  • Acoach, L. C. y Webb, L. M. (2004). The influence of language brokering on Hispanic teenagers' acculturation, academic performance, and nonverbal decoding skills: a preliminary study. The Howard Journal of Communication, 15, 1-19.
  • Bagby, R.M., Parker, J.D. y Taylor, G.J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(1), 23-32.
  • Bänziger, T., Grandjean, D. y Scherer, K. R. (2009). Emotion recognition from expressions in face, voice, and body: The Multimodal Emotion Recognition Test (MERT). Emotion, 9(5), 691-704.
  • Bänziger, T., Scherer, K. R., Hall, J. A. y Rosenthal, R. (2011). Introducing the MiniPONS: A Short Multichannel Version of the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(3), 189-204.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y. y Plumb, I. (2001). The 'reading the mind in the eyes' test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241-251.
  • Barrett, L.F., Lane, R.D., Sechrest, L. y Schwartz, G.E. (2000). Sex differences in emotional awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1027-1035.
  • Bauer, P., Stennes, L., y Haight, J. (2003). Representation of the inner self in autobiography: Women's and men's use of internal states language in personal narratives. Memory, 11(1), 27-42.
  • Belin, P., Fillion-Bilodeau, S. y Gosselin, F. (2008). The montreal affective voices: A validated set of nonverbal affect bursts for research on auditory affective processing. Behavioural Research Methods, 40(2), 531-539.
  • Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 291-294.
  • Bradley, M. M. y Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology, 37, 204-215.
  • Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D. y Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 300-319.
  • Buck, R. (1976). A test of nonverbal receiving ability: Preliminary studies. Human Communication Research, 2(2), 162-171.
  • Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, F. y Lassonde, M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 220-225.
  • DiMatteo, M. R., Friedman, H. S., y Taranta, A. (1979). Sensitivity to bodily non-verbal communication as a factor in practitioner-patient rapport. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4(1), 18-26.
  • DiMatteo, M. R., Hays, R. D. y Prince, L. M. (1986). Relationship of physician's nonverbal communi- cation skill to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload. Health Psychology, 5(6), 581-594.
  • Ekman, P. y Friesen, W.V. (1976). Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
  • Erceg-Hurn, D. M. y Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to improve the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.
  • Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N. y Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale [Validez y fiabilidad de la version española modificada de la Trait MetaMood Scale]. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 751-755.
  • Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 214-219.
  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 845-857.
  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hall, J. A. (1998). How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and sensitivity to non-verbal cues. En Canary, D.J. y Dindia, K. (Eds), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 155-177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, J. A. (2001). The PONS test and the psychometric approach to measuring interpersonal sensitivity. En J. A. Hall y F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 143-160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, J. A. , Bernieri, F. J., Carney, D. R. (2005). Nonverbal and Interpersonal Sensitivity. En Jinni, A. Harrigan, J. A., Rosenthal, R. y Scherer, K. R. (Eds.) The New Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research, pp. 267-269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hall, J.A. y Bernieri, F.J. (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, J.A. y Halberstadt, A. G. (1994). "Subordination" and sensitivity to nonverbal cues: A study of married working women. Sex Roles, 31, 149-165.
  • Hall, J. A., Andrzejewski, S. A. y Yopchick, J. E. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(3), 149-180.
  • Hall, J. A., Andrzejewski, S. A., Murphy, N. A., Mast, M. S. y Feinstein, B. A. (2008). Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1476-1489.
  • Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A. y Mast, M. S. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30(4), 141-155.
  • Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A. y Mast, M. S. (2007). Nonverbal self-accuracy in interpersonal interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1675-1685.
  • Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., Blanch, D. C. y Frankel, R. M. (2009). Nonverbal sensitivity in medical students: Implications for clinical interactions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(11), 1217-1222.
  • Hill, C. E., Siegelman, L., Gronsky, B. R., Sturniolo, F. y Fretz, B. R. (1981). Nonverbal communication and counseling outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(3), 203-212.
  • John, O. P. y Soto, C. J. (2007). The importance of being valid. Reliability and the process of construct validation. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley y R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 461-494). Nueva York, NY: Guilford.
  • Juslin, P. N. y Scherer, K. R. (2005). Vocal expression of affect. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal, y K. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 65-135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Knapp, M.L. y Hall, J.A. (2002). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Wadsworth: Thompson Learning, Inc.
  • Konold, T. R., Jamison, K. R., Stanton-Chapman, T. L. y Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2010). Relationships among informant based measures of social skills and student achievement: a longitudinal examination of differential effects by sex. Applied Developmental Science, 14(1), 18-34.
  • Lee, D. Y., Hallberg, E. T., Kocsis, M. y Haase, R. F. (1980). Decoding skills in nonverbal communication and perceived interviewer effectiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27(1), 89-92.
  • Martínez-Sánchez, F. (1996). Adaptación española de la escala de alexitimia de Toronto (TAS-20). Clínica y Salud, 7(1), 19-32.
  • Martínez-Sánchez, F., Blanco, M. L., Páez, D. y Costa, D. (en prensa). Beliefs about the effects of social sharing of emotion in alexithymia. Psicot-hema
  • Martínez-Sánchez, F., Zech, E. y Páez, D. (2004). Adaptación española del cuestionario de creencias sobre los efectos del compartimiento social de las emociones, BSEQ. Ansiedad y Estrés, 10(1), 63-74.
  • Mast, M. S., Jonas, K. y Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: the phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835-850.
  • Mayer, J. D. y Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17(4), 433-442.
  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R. y Sitaremos, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. Emotion, 3(1), 97-105.
  • Mill, A., Allik, J., Realo, A., Valk, R. (2009). Age-related differences in emotion recognition ability: a cross-sectional study. Emotion, 9(5), 619-630.
  • Miller, A. B. y Lenzenweger, M. F. (2012). Schizotypy, social cognition and interpersonal sensitivity. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, May 28,
  • Nowicki, S. y Duke, M. P. (1994). Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(1), 9-35.
  • Orbelo, D. M., Grim, M. A., Talbott, R. E. y Ross, E. D. (2005). Impaired comprehension of affective prosody in elderly subjects is not predicted by age-related hearing loss or age-related cognitive decline. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 18(1), 25-32.
  • Pérez, J. E. y Riggio, R. E. (2003). Nonverbal social skills and psychopathology. En P. Philippot, E. J. Coats y R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior in clinical settings (pp. 17-44). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Riggio, R. E. (1989). Manual for the Social Skills Inventory: Research edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Riggio, R. E. (2006). Nonverbal skills and abilities. En V. Manusov y M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 79-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., O'Brien, K., MacCann, C., Reid, J. y Maul, A. (2006). Exploring the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) with established emotions measures. Emotion, 6(4), 663-669.
  • Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L. y Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS Test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Ruffman, T., Henry, J. D., Livingstone, V. y Phillips, L. H. (2008). A meta- analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 863-881.
  • Russell, J. A. y Fernandez-Dols, J. M. (Eds.) (1997). The Psychology of Facial Expression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Salguero, J. M., Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Balluerka, N. y Aritzeta, A. (2010). Measuring perceived emotional intelligence in adolescent population: psychometric properties of the Trait Meta Mood Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(9), 1197-1210.
  • Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., y Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: exploring emotional intelligence using Trait Meta-Mood Scale. En J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, Disclosure, & Health (pp. 125-154). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  • Sawilowsky, S. y Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and type II error properties of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 353-360.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2007). Component models of emotion can inform the quest for emotional competence. En G. Matthews, M. Zeidner y R. D. Roberts (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns (pp. 101-126). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307-1351.
  • Scherer, K. R. y Bänziger, T. (2010). On the use of actor portrayals in research on emotional expression. En K. R. Scherer, T. Bänziger y E. B. Roesch, (Eds.), Blueprint for affective computing: A sourcebook (pp. 166-178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R. y Scherer, U. (2011). Assessing the ability to recognize facial and vocal expressions of emotion: Construction and validation of the Emotion Recognition Index (ERI). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(4), 305-326.
  • Scherer, K. R., Banse, R., Wallbott, H. G. y Goldbeck, T. (1991). Vocal cues in emotion encoding and decoding. Motivation and Emotion, 15(2), 123-148.
  • Simon, D., Craig, K. D., Gosselin, F., Belin, P. y Rainville, P. (2008). Recognition and discrimination of prototypical dynamic expressions of pain and emotions. Pain, 135(1-2), 55-64.
  • Sullivan, S. y Ruffman, T. (2004). Emotion recognition deficits in the elderly. International Journal of Neuroscience, 114(3), 403-432.
  • Sullivan, S., Ruffman, T. y Hutton, S. B. (2007). Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces. Journal of Gerontology, 62B(1), 53-60.
  • Suzuki, A., Hoshino, T., Shigemasu, K. y Kawamura, M. (2007). Decline or improvement? Age-related differences in facial expression recognition. Biological Psychology, 74(1), 75-84.
  • Tickle-Degnen, L. (1998). Working well with others: The prediction of students' clinical performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(2), 133-142.
  • Timmers, M., Fischer, A. y Manstead, A. (2003). Ability versus vulnerability: Beliefs about men's and women's emotional behaviour. Cognition & Emotion, 17(1), 41-63.
  • Wallbott, H. G. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 879-896.
La source de données: Dialnet