Five-factor model of personality disordersSpanish normative data and validation

  1. Joaquín Colodro
  2. Juan J. López-García
  3. Laura Mezquita
  4. Lucía Colodro-Conde
  5. Manuel I. Ibáñez
  6. Silvia Edo
  7. Elena Villa
  8. Generós Ortet
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Ano de publicación: 2018

Volume: 34

Número: 2

Páxinas: 264-273

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.34.2.289271 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Anales de psicología

Resumo

The categorical approach of personality disorders (PD) has given way to a dimensional paradigm. Within this, the Five-factor model (FFM) proposes theoretical hypotheses describing personality pathologies and PD empirical prototypes based on the DSM (DSM-PD). Moreover, a methodology to score DSM-PD using the NEO PI-R facets was developed. In this ex post-facto study FFM-PD count norms were developed using data from the NEO PI-R Spanish adaptation. Furthermore, the diagnostic agreement with the IPDE and validity of FFM-PD counts was analyzed in a clinical (n = 222) and non-clinical sample (n = 742). Based on NEO PI-R scores, we presented Spanish FFM-PD normative data. FFMPD benchmarks were highly likely to be exceeded if subjects were classified as a subclinical case in the DSM-PD. Convergent correlations of FFM-PD counts with their equivalent subclinical cases of DSM-PD were statistically significant and outperformed any divergent correlation as well as the average divergent correlations in all FFM-PD. The use of a count technique based on NEO PI-R facets and Spanish FFM-PD normative data facilitate PD understanding and interpretation in various applied psychology fields

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

This work was supported by the Autonomous Government of Valencia, Spain (Grant GV/2016/158). LCC was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Fundación Séneca (Seneca Foundation, Regional Agency for Science and Technology, Murcia, Spain, 19151/PD/13) and a QIMR Berghofer Fellowship, Australia. We thank Donald R. Lynam and Joshua D. Miller for their suggestions in this work.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
  • Bagby, R. M., Costa, P. T., Widiger, T. A., Ryder, A. G., & Marshall, M. (2005). DSM‐IV personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: A multi-method examination of domain-and facet-level predictions. European Journal of Personality, 19(4), 307-324. doi:10.1002/per.563
  • Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., & De Fruyt, F. (2013). Comparing five sets of five-factor model personality disorder counts in a heterogeneous sample of psychiatric patients. European Journal of Personality, 27(4), 377-388. doi:10.1002/per.1859
  • Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual [Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor inventory (NEO FFI). Manual]. (3rd ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet