Modelización 3D de última generación y simulación mediante dispositivos de realidad virtual para mejorar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de cirugía hepatobiliar con alumnos de medicina

  1. López López, Víctor 1
  2. de la Cruz, Juan 1
  3. Navarro Barrios, Álvaro 1
  4. Brusadin, Roberto 1
  5. Crespo, María Jesús 1
  6. Sánchez Esquer, Ignacio 1
  7. Mezquita, Carmen 1
  8. Iniesta, María 1
  9. López Conesa, Asunción 1
  10. Robles Campos, Ricardo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
RED: revista de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1578-7680

Any de publicació: 2024

Títol de l'exemplar: Visions of three-dimensional or virtual workspaces in medical and surgical education. Analysis of cases and experiences from the perspective of learning outcomes in the training of active professionals.

Volum: 24

Número: 79

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.6018/RED.608431 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: RED: revista de educación a distancia

Resum

Next generation modelling 3D devices and simulation with virtual reality glasses represent a new tool that can be used to improve the understanding of hepatobiliary surgery in medical students. Between september 2022 and january 2024 we conducted a prospective study among 4th year medical students. A new teaching methodology based on technological innovations centered on state-of-the-art 3D was implemented. A survey was used to evaluate satisfaction, usefulness, improvement, implementation, comprehension and motivation indexes. A total of 46 students answered the questionnaire. A total of 95.7% agreed that the 3D virtual models and virtual reality favored a greater interest in the class, with no unfavorable response in this respect. 95.7% agreed that the use of 3D printed models should have a greater presence in surgery classes. A 97.8% agreed that surgical videos assisted by 3D reconstructions should have more presence in the classroom. The results of this study support the effectiveness and acceptance of 3D technology-based teaching methodology in the teaching of hepatic surgical anatomy.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Al‐Badri, N., Touzet‐Roumazeille, S., Nuytten, A., Ferri, J., Charkaluk, M. L., & Nicot, R. (2022). Three‐dimensional printing models improve long‐term retention in medical education of pathoanatomy: A randomized controlled study. Clinical Anatomy, 35(5), 609-615.
  • Ammanuel, S., Brown, I., Uribe, J., & Rehani, B. (2019). Creating 3D models from radiologic images for virtual reality medical education modules. Journal of medical systems, 43(6), 166.
  • Aranda, F. P., Piñeiro, L. V., Pérez, M. C., & Andorrà, E. C. (2022). Robotic cholecystectomy and transcystic common bile duct exploration with augmented reality glasses and indocyanine green in a patient with a cystic duct cyst. Cirugia Espanola, 101(8), 562-563.
  • Azer, S. A., & Azer, S. (2016). 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: a review of the quality of the literature. Health professions education, 2(2), 80-98.
  • Berney, S., Bétrancourt, M., Molinari, G., & Hoyek, N. (2015). How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anatomical sciences education, 8(5), 452-462.
  • Chen, G., Li, X. C., Wu, G. Q., Zhang, S. X., Xiong, X. F., Tan, L. W., ... & Dong, J. H. (2010). Three-dimensional reconstruction of digitized human liver: based on Chinese Visible Human. Chinese medical journal, 123(02), 146-150.
  • Chedid, V. G., Kamath, A. A., Knudsen, J. M., Frimannsdottir, K., Yost, K. J., Geske, J. R., ... & Kamath, P. S. (2020). Three-dimensional-printed liver model helps learners identify hepatic subsegments: A randomized-controlled cross-over trial. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG, 115(11), 1906-1910.
  • Cheng, J., Wang, Z. F., Yao, W. F., Liu, J. W., Lu, Y., Wang, Q., & Cai, X. J. (2023). Comparison of 3D printing model to 3D virtual reconstruction and 2D imaging for the clinical education of interns in hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 14(1), 325-333.
  • Del Cerro Velázquez, F., & Morales Méndez, G. (2021). Systematic review of the development of spatial intelligence through augmented reality in stem knowledge areas. Mathematics, 9(23), 3067.
  • DeOliveira, M. L., Schulick, R. D., Nimura, Y., Rosen, C., Gores, G., Neuhaus, P., & Clavien, P. A. (2011). New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology, 53(4), 1363-1371.
  • Giehl-Brown, E., Dennler, S., Garcia, S. A., Seppelt, D., Oehme, F., Schweipert, J., ... & Riediger, C. (2023). 3D liver model-based surgical education improves preoperative decision-making and patient satisfaction—A randomized pilot trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 37(6), 4545-4554.
  • Glossop, S. C., Bhachoo, H., Murray, T. M., Cherif, R. A., Helo, J. Y., Morgan, E., & Poacher, A. T. (2023). Undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK: systematic review. BJS open, 7(5).
  • Huang, Z., Song, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhou, D., Zhou, X., & He, Y. (2018). Three-dimensional printing model improves morphological understanding in acetabular fracture learning: A multicenter, randomized, controlled study. PloS one, 13(1).
  • Jurgaitis, J., Paškonis, M., Pivoriūnas, J., Martinaitytė, I., Juška, A., Jurgaitienė, R., ... & Strupas, K. (2008). The comparison of 2-dimensional with 3-dimensional hepatic visualization in the clinical hepatic anatomy education. Medicina, 44(6), 428-438.
  • Keller, J. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance. Science þ Business Media, 227–286, Springer.
  • Kong, X., Nie, L., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Ye, Q., Tang, L., ... & Li, J. (2016). Do 3D printing models improve anatomical teaching about hepatic segments to medical students? A randomized controlled study. World journal of surgery, 40, 1969-1976.
  • Langlois, J., Wells, G. A., Lecourtois, M., Bergeron, G., Yetisir, E., & Martin, M. (2015). Spatial abilities of medical graduates and choice of residency programs. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(2), 111-119.
  • Li, Z., Li, Z., Xu, R., Li, M., Li, J., Liu, Y., ... & Chen, Z. (2015). Three-dimensional printing models improve understanding of spinal fracture—A randomized controlled study in China. Scientific reports, 5(1), 11570.
  • Lim, K. H. A., Loo, Z. Y., Goldie, S. J., Adams, J. W., & McMenamin, P. G. (2016). Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anatomical sciences education, 9(3), 213-221.
  • Lopez-Lopez, V., Robles-Campos, R., García-Calderon, D., Lang, H., Cugat, E., Jiménez-Galanes, S., ... & Parrilla-Paricio, P. (2021a). Applicability of 3D-printed models in hepatobiliary surgey: results from “LIV3DPRINT” multicenter study. HPB, 23(5), 675-684.
  • Lopez-Lopez, V., Gomez-Perez, B., de Vicente, E., Jiménez-Galanes, S., Mora-Oliver, I., Sabater, L., ... & Robles-Campos, R. (2021b). Next-generation three-dimensional modelling software for personalized surgery decision-making in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: multicentre study. British Journal of Surgery, 108(12), 394-395.
  • Lopez-Lopez, V., Sánchez-Esquer, I., Crespo, M. J., Navarro, M. Á., Brusadin, R., Conesa, A. L., ... & Robles-Campos, R. (2023). Development and validation of advanced three-dimensional navigation device integrated in da Vinci Xi® surgical robot for hepatobiliary surgery: pilot study. British Journal of Surgery, 110(1), 108-110.
  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
  • Metzler, R., Stein, D., Tetzlaff, R., Bruckner, T., Meinzer, H. P., Büchler, M. W., ... & Fischer, L. (2012). Teaching on three-dimensional presentation does not improve the understanding of according CT images: a randomized controlled study. Teaching and learning in medicine, 24(2), 140-148.
  • Samadbeik, M., Yaaghobi, D., Bastani, P., Abhari, S., Rezaee, R., & Garavand, A. (2018). The applications of virtual reality technology in medical groups teaching. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 6(3), 123.
  • Sattar, M., Palaniappan, S., Lokman, A., Shah, N., Khalid, U., & Hasan, R. (2020). Motivating medical students using virtual reality based education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(2), 160-174.
  • Stull, A. T., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). Getting a handle on learning anatomy with interactive three-dimensional graphics. Journal of educational psychology, 101(4), 803.
  • Pottle, J. (2019). Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future healthcare journal, 6(3), 181.
  • Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Luo, H., Gao, C., Zhang, J., & Dai, Y. (2017). Is a three-dimensional printing model better than a traditional cardiac model for medical education? A pilot randomized controlled study. Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 33(6), 664-669.
  • Wu, A. M., Wang, K., Wang, J. S., Chen, C. H., Yang, X. D., Ni, W. F., & Hu, Y. Z. (2018). The addition of 3D printed models to enhance the teaching and learning of bone spatial anatomy and fractures for undergraduate students: a randomized controlled study. Annals of translational medicine, 6(20).
  • Yi, X., Ding, C., Xu, H., Huang, T., Kang, D., & Wang, D. (2019). Three-dimensional printed models in anatomy education of the ventricular system: a randomized controlled study. World neurosurgery, 125, 891-901.
  • Zhang, H., He, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Jin, Q., Xu, S., ... & Niu, F. (2021). Virtual reality and three-dimensional printed models improve the morphological understanding in learning mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a randomized controlled study. Frontiers in Surgery, 8, 705532.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet