Additional file 1 of In-depth proteome characterization of endometrium and extraembryonic membranes during implantation in pig

  1. Gil, Maria A. 12
  2. Cambra, Josep M. 3
  3. Rodriguez-Martinez, Heriberto 4
  4. Cuello, Cristina 12
  5. Parrilla, Inmaculada 12
  6. Martinez, Emilio A. 12
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria Virgen de la Arrixaca
    info

    Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria Virgen de la Arrixaca

    Murcia, España

  3. 3 Technical University Munich
    info

    Technical University Munich

    Múnich, Alemania

    ROR https://ror.org/02kkvpp62

  4. 4 Linköping University
    info

    Linköping University

    Linköping, Suecia

    ROR https://ror.org/05ynxx418

Mostrar afiliacións +

Editor: figshare

Ano de publicación: 2024

Tipo: Dataset

CC BY 4.0

DOI: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.25389494.V1 lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Resumo

Additional file 1: Table S1. Complete list of the 3,254 proteins identified in endometrium of pregnant sows during implantation (d 18 and 24 of gestation) validated with a peptide confidence threshold of 95% and a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%. Table S2. Complete list of the 3,457 proteins identified in endometrium of non-pregnant sows at d 18 and 24 of cycle validated with a peptide confidence threshold of 95% and a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%. Table S3. Complete list of the 3,968 proteins identified in extra-embryonic membranes of pregnant sows at d 18 and 24 of gestation validated with a peptide confidence threshold of 95% and a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%. Table S4. Complete list of 1,751 unique proteins in endometrium of pregnant sows. Table S5. Complete list of 1,704 unique proteins in endometrium of non-pregnant sows. Table S6. Complete list of 1,753 common proteins in endometrium of pregnant and non-pregnant sows. Table S7. Functional group analysis with their associated proteins in unique pregnant sow’s proteins with immune system annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S8. Functional group analysis with their associated proteins in unique pregnant sow’s proteins with biological adhesion annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S9. Functional group analysis with their associated proteins in unique pregnant sow’s proteins with reproductive process annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S10. The Gene Ontology (GO) Biological functional groups analysis with their associated proteins in unique pregnant sow’s proteins with reproductive process annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S11. Functional group analysis with their associated proteins in unique non-pregnant sow’s proteins with immune system annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S12. Functional group analysis with their associated proteins in unique pregnant sow’s proteins with biological adhesion annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S13. The Gene Ontology (GO) Biological functional groups analysis with their associated proteins in unique pregnant sow’s proteins with reproductive process annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S14. Functional group analysis with their associated proteins in pregnant sow’s extraembryonic membrane proteins with reproductive process annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin). Table S15. The Gene Ontology (GO) Biological functional groups analysis with their associated proteins in pregnant sow’s extraembryonic membrane proteins with reproductive process annotation (data generated by ClueGO plugin).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 10.1371/journal.pone.0033625
  • 10.1095/biolreprod.104.030957
  • 10.1016/0093-691x(85)90075-5
  • 10.1093/biolre/ioz058
  • 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02103.x
  • 10.3390/genes6041330
  • 10.3390/ijms20061335
  • 10.3390/ani10030420
  • 10.3390/biom10040554
  • 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100590
  • 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.05.003
  • 10.1530/rep.1.00882
  • 10.1186/1477-5956-9-41
  • 10.1186/s12864-019-6353-2
  • 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.12.001
  • 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14440
  • 10.1074/mcp.t600050-mcp200
  • 10.1093/nar/gkab1038
  • 10.1002/pmic.200701189
  • 10.1071/rd16435
  • 10.3390/ijms22136720
  • 10.1111/rda.14142
  • 10.1093/biolre/ioab186
  • 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00848.x
  • 10.1159/000028097
  • 10.12688/f1000research.22092.1
  • 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.004
  • 10.1095/biolreprod.112.099945
  • 10.1097/00004347-200204000-00009
  • 10.1530/jrf.0.1070007
  • 10.1186/s12864-019-6264-2
  • 10.1074/jbc.m213100200
  • 10.1210/en.2005-0090
  • 10.1016/j.ygcen.2017.05.015
  • 10.1016/j.gep.2019.119064
  • 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.05.007
  • 10.1530/rep-20-0015
  • 10.1210/jc.2007-1536
  • 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.11.001
  • 10.1242/dev.107409
  • 10.1371/journal.pone.0123965
  • 10.1242/dev.02830
  • 10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80055-7
  • 10.1111/rda.14357
  • 10.1002/pmic.200701134