Assignment of Subject Headings and Classification Codes to e-books in South American University Libraries

  1. Gil Leiva, Isidoro 1
  2. Andrade e Cruz, Maria Carolina 2
  3. Marques Redigolo, Franciele 2
  4. Spotti Lopes Fujita, Mariângela 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia, Facultad de Comunicación y Documentación
  2. 2 Universidade Estadual Paulista
    info

    Universidade Estadual Paulista

    São Paulo, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/00987cb86

Revista:
Revista española de documentación científica

ISSN: 0210-0614,  1988-4621

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 47

Número: 2

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/REDC.2024.1513 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de documentación científica

Resumen

La integración de libros electrónicos en las bibliotecas universitarias ha permitido interesantes análisis y discusiones en los últimos años sobre las preferencias de los usuarios entre los libros impresos y electrónicos, las dificultades y desafíos que enfrentan los bibliotecarios en su incorporación a las bibliotecas, entre otros aspectos. Sin embargo, con este trabajo, el objetivo principal es analizar los cambios que están ocurriendo en las bibliotecas universitarias de América del Sur en relación con los procesos de asignación de encabezamientos de materia y códigos de clasificación con la incorporación masiva de libros electrónicos, así como comprender las percepciones de los bibliotecarios sobre estos cambios. Para lograrlo, desarrollamos y distribuimos un cuestionario en línea que constaba de veinticuatro preguntas a un total de 1,175 bibliotecas universitarias en Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Perú y Uruguay, de las cuales recibimos 123 respuestas (10.5%). Entre otros hallazgos, se concluye que los procesos de indexación y clasificación están perdiendo relevancia en las actividades de los bibliotecarios, la calidad de los metadatos proporcionados por las editoriales no parece ser un factor significativo para los bibliotecarios y, además, los datos obtenidos no indican claramente un cambio de paradigma en relación con los procesos de indexación y clasificación.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albanese, AR (2007). Ebooks face triple threat. Library Journal, 132(12), 23-24.
  • Allen, AL, Kulczak, DE, & Gilbertson, MA (2017). From digital repositories to the library catalogue: two workflows for transforming metadata. Journal of Digital Media Management, 6(1), 95–117.
  • Asula, M, Makke, J, Freienthal, L, Kuulmets, HA, & Sirel, R. (2021). Kratt: developing an automatic subject indexing tool for the National Library of Estonia. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(8), 775-793.
  • Belanger, J (2007). Cataloguing e-books in UK Higher Education Libraries: report of a survey. Program: electronic library and information systems, 41(3), 203-216.
  • Buschow, C, Nolle, I, & Schneider, B (2014). German book publishers’ barriers to disruptive innovations: the case of e-book adoption. Publishing Research Quarterly, 30 (1), 63-76.
  • Breeding, M (2017). The complicated story of e-books in libraries. Computers in Libraries, 37(5), 16-8.
  • Breedt, A & Walter, D (2012). White paper: the link between Metadata and Sales. Nielsen BookData. Available at: https://www.nielsenisbnstore.com/documents/3971_Nielsen_Metadata_white_paper_A4.pdf.
  • Ciptayani, PI, & Dewi, KC (2018). Decision support system of e-book provider selection for library using Simple Additive Weighting. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(012066).
  • Chen, M, Kim, M, & Montgomery, D (2016). E-book record management at the University of Texas at Dallas. Technical Services Quarterly, 33(3), 251-267.
  • Connaway, LS, & Lawrence, SR (2003). Comparing library resource allocations for the paper and the digital library: an exploratory study. D-Lib Magazine, 9(12), 1082-9873.
  • Costello, L (2017). Comparison of e-book acquisitions strategies across disciplines Finds Differences in cost and usage. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(1), 109-111.
  • Derrot S, & Koskas M (2016). My fair metadata: cataloging legal deposit e-books at the national library of France. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 54(8), 583-592.
  • Dillon, D (2002). Fishing the Electronic River: disruptive technologies, the unlibrary, and the ecology of information. Journal of Library Administration, 36(2), 45-58.
  • European Bureau of Library Information and Documentation Associations. (2012). Key principles on the acquisition of and access to e-books by libraries. Available at: http://www.eblida.org/Special%20Events/Key-principles-acquistion-eBooks-November2012/GB_English%20Version%20Key%20Principles.pdf.
  • Frederick, DE (2015). On e-books in academic libraries: An article based on a presentation at the Library 2014 Conference. Library Hi Tech News, 32(5), 12-15.
  • Frederick, DE (2016). Managing e-book metadata in Academic Libraries: taming the tiger. Chandos Publishing.
  • Frederick, DE (2017). Disruption or revolution? The reinvention of cataloguing (Data Deluge Column). Library Hi Tech News, 34(7), 6-11.
  • Fujita, MSL, Gil-Leiva, I, & Redigolo, FM (2021). Inovação de processos técnicos em e-books em bibliotecas universitárias no Brasil: análise de percepção dos bibliotecários. Revista ACB: Biblioteconomia em Santa Catarina, 26(3), 1-18.
  • Garofalo, DA (2018). Tips from the trenches. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 35(1), 47-49.
  • Gates, LE, & Glazier, R (2019). Getting a Handle on Duplicate Ebooks. Collection Management, 44 (2-4), 361-378.
  • Gilbert, RJ (2015). E-books: a tale of digital disruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 165–184.
  • Gil-Leiva, I, Fujita, MSL, Ortuño, PMD, & Reis, DMA (2018). Is the Massive Incorporation of E-Books into University Libraries Devaluing the Technical Processes Related to the Assigning of Subject Headings and Classification Codes? [Conference presentation]. Fifteenth International ISKO, Porto, Portugal.
  • Gil-Leiva, I, Fujita, MSL, Ortuño, P, & Reis, DM (2020). The abandonment of the assignment of subject headings and classification codes in university libraries due to massive emergence of electronic books. Knowledge Organization, 47(8), 646-667.
  • Herrington, VJ (2013). The Academic Library: cowpath or path to the future? Journal of Library Innovation, 4(2), 54-68.
  • Kahn, M, & Underwood, PG (2013). Issues related to the adoption of e-books in academic libraries: a literature review. Sajis Journal Library & Information Science, 79(2), 10-17.
  • Kont, KR (2021). If time and money matters: e-book program challenges in tallinn university of technology library. Slavic and East European Information Resources, 22(2), 170-196.
  • Lafferty, S, & Edwards, J (2004). Disruptive technologies: what future Universities and their Libraries? Library Management, 25(6-7), 252-58.
  • Lewis, DW (2004). The innovator’s dilemma: disruptive change and Academic Libraries. Library Administration & Management, 18(2), 68-74.
  • Liu, LG, & Terng, C (2022). Estimating Scale and Scope Economies of Academic Libraries: Using the Flexible Fixed Cost Quadratic Function. Library Trends, 70(3), 284-303.
  • Martin, KE, & Mundle, K (2011). Cataloging e-books and vendor records. Library Resources & Technical Services, 54(4), 227-237.
  • Moore, M (2011). Keeping Current with Electronic Resources and Libraries. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 8(3), 263-271.
  • Moulaison-Sandy, H, Cho, H, & Dykas, F (2022). Approaches to conceptualizing the cost of academic library cataloging: Discourses on metadata creation cost, value, and worth. Library Trends, 70(3), 387-408.
  • Mi, X, & Pollock, BM (2019). “Ebooks for the Classroom+” at University of south Florida libraries: a case study of database management. Journal of Web Librarianship, 13(2), 95-111.
  • Mune, C, & Agee, A (2015). E-book showdown: evaluating academic e-book platforms from a user perspective. [Conference presentation]. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), Portland, OR, United States. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ann_agee/19/.
  • NISO RP-29-2022. (2022). E-Book Bibliographic Metadata Requirements in the Sale, Publication, Discovery, Delivery, and Preservation Supply Chain.
  • Pandey, SK (2016). Impact of e-books in academic libraries. International Journal of Research in Library Science, 2(1), 151-154.
  • Park, J, & Tosaka, Y (2010). Metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections: criteria, semantics, and mechanisms. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(8), 696-715.
  • Patra, NK (2017). Digital disruption and electronic resource management in libraries. Chandos Publishing.
  • Ravit HD, & Dana, T (2015). Assessing Metadata and Controlling Quality in Scholarly Ebooks. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53, 801-824.
  • Roncevic, M (2013). E-Book platforms for libraries. Library Technology Reports, 49(3), 1-46.
  • Sanchez, E, Fatout, L, Howser, A, & Vance, C (2006). Cleanup of netlibrary cataloging records a methodical front-end process. Technical Services Quarterly, 23(4), 51-71.
  • Stachokas, G (2014). In After the Book Information Services for the 21st Century. Chandos Publishing.
  • Stachokas, G (2019). The role of the electronic resources librarian. Chandos.
  • Suominen, O (2019) Annif: DIY automated subject indexing using multiple algorithms. Liber quarterly, 29(1), 1-25.
  • Suominen, O, Inkinen, J, & Lehtinen, M (2022). Annif and Finto AI: Developing and Implementing Automated Subject Indexing. JLIS.It, 13(1), 265-282.
  • Traill, S (2013). Quality issues in vendor-provided e-monograph records. Library Resources & Technical Services, 57(4), 213-226.
  • Vasileiou, M, Hartley, RJ, Rowley, J (2012). Choosing e-books: a perspective from academic libraries. Online Information Review, 36(1), 21-39.
  • Walton, R, Mauldwin, J, Bunderson, J (2022). Patron Drivers, Patron Impacts: Investigating Potential Patron Impacts of Moving to a Patron Driven Acquisition Model for Print Books. Collection Management, 47(4), 272-285.
  • Wiersma, G, Tovstiadi, E (2017). Inconsistencies between academic e-book platforms: a comparison of metadata and search results. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(3), 617-648.
  • Wilson, TD (2014). The e-book phenomenon: a disruptive technology. Information Research, 19(2), 1-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v6i1-2.180.
  • Wu, A, & Mitchell, AE (2010). Mass management of e-book catalog records: approaches, challenges, and solutions. Library Resources & Technical Services, 54(3), 164-174.
  • Yuan, W, Ballegooie, MV, & Robertson, JL (2018). Ebooks versus print books: format preferences in an academic library. Collection Management, 43(1), 28-48.
  • Zhang, L, & Jin, M (2014) Cataloging e-books: dealing with vendors and various other problems. The Serials Librarian, 67(1), 76–80.
  • Zhao, S, & Zhao, W (2010) Addresing the challenge: cataloguing electronic books in academic libraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(1), 93-103.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet