Argumentatividadqué es y cómo medirla. El caso en el discurso de adultos mayores y jóvenes universitarios chilenos

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Caplan, D.,Dede, G.,Waters, G.,Michaud, J.,Tripodis, Y. (2011). Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses. Psychology and Aging. 26. 439
• Dede, G.,Caplan, D.,Kemtes, K.,Waters, G. (2004). The relationship between age, verbal working memory, and language comprehension. Psychology and Aging. 19. 601
• Dessalles, J.-L,Grieve, J. (2007). Why We Talk. The Evolutionary Origins of Language. Oxford University Press.
• Evans, J.S.B.T. (2010). Thinking Twice. Two Minds in one brain. Oxford University Press.
• Evans, J.,Frankish, K. (2009). In two minds. Dual processes and beyond.
• Felton, M.,Kuhn, D. (2001). The Development of Argumentative Discourse Skill. Discourse Processes. 32. 135
• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in everyday Life. Overlook Press.
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behaviour. Aldine.
• Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic Interaction. University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Hample, D. (2005). Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hample, D. (2018). Interpersonal Arguing. Peter Lang.
• Hample, D.,Anagondahalli, D. (2015). Understandings of Arguing in India and the United States: Argument Frames, Personalization of Conflict, Argumentativeness, and Verbal Aggressiveness. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 44. 1-26
• Hample, D.,Dallinger, J.M. (1985). Cognitive Editing of Argument Strategies. Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Denver, CO. November 7-10, 1985.
• Hample, D.,Richards, A.,Skubisz, C. (2013). Blurting. Communication Monographs. 80. 503
• Hample, D.,Warner, B.,Young, D. (2009). Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments. Argumentation. 23. 21-37
• Infante, D.A.,Rancer, A.S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment. 46. 72-80
• Infante, D.A.,Rancer, A.S. (1996). Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggression: A Review of Recent Theory and Research. Annals of the International Communication Association. 19. 319
• Infante, D.A.,Wigley, C.J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs. 53. 61
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Allen Lane.
• Kemper, S.,Greiner, L.H.,Marquis, J.G.,Prenovost, K.,Mitzner, T.L. (2001). Language decline across the life span: findings from the nun study. Psychology and Aging. 16. 227
• Kemper, S.,Sumner, A. (2001). The structure of verbal abilities in young an older adults. Psychology and Aging. 16. 312
• Mackenzie, C. (2000). Adult spoken discourse: the influences of age and education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 35. 269
• Manktelow, K.,Over, D.,Elqayam, S. (2011). The Science of Reason. A Festschrift for Jonathan St. B.T. Evans. Psychology Press.
• Marraud, H. (2017). De las siete maneras de contraargumentar. Quadripartita Ratio. 52
• Mercier, H. (2011). On the Universality of Argumentative Reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Culture. 11. 85-113
• Mercier, H. (2011). Reasoning Serves Argumentation in Children. Cognitive Development. 26. 177
• Mercier, H. (2011). What good is moral reasoning?. Mind & Society. 10. 131
• Mercier, H. (2011). When Experts Argue: Explaining the Best and the Worst of Reasoning. Argumentation. 25. 313
• Mercier, H. (2012). Looking for Arguments. Argumentation. 26. 305
• Mercier, H. (2020). Not Born Yesterday. The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe. Princeton University Press.
• Mercier, H.,Landemore, H. (2012). Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation. Political Psychology. 33. 243
• Mercier, H.,Sperber, D. (2009). Intuitive and reflective inferences. In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. 149
• Mercier, H.,Sperber, D. (2017). The Enigma of Reason. A New Theory of Human Understanding. Allen Lane.
• Paglieri, F.,Castelfranchi, C. (2010). Why argue? Towards a costs-benefit analysis of argumentation. Argument & Computation. 1. 71-91
• Rancer, A.S.,Avtgis, T.A. (2006). Argumentative and Aggressive Communication: Theory, Research, and Application.
• Rancer, A.S.,Infante, D.A. (1985). Relations between motivation to argue and the argumentativeness of adversaries. Communication Quarterly. 33. 209
• Santibáñez, C. (2014). ¿Para qué sirve argumentar? Problematizando teórica y empíricamente el valor y la función de la argumentación. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación. 58. 163-205
• Santibáñez, C. (2019). Generosos y empáticos o ¿pragmáticos y utilitaristas?: los argumentos del adulto mayor chileno frente a un dilema social. Lingüística y Literatura. 40. 174-208
• Santibáñez, C.,Hample, D. (2015). Orientations toward interpersonal arguing in Chile. Pragmatics. 23. 453
• Santibáñez, C.,Migdalek, M.,Rosemberg, C. (2016). Ecología Argumentativa Universitaria: desde la realidad a los conceptos. Editorial Cosmigonon. Concepción.
• Singer, T.,Verhaeghen, P.,Ghisletta, P.,Lindenberger, U.,Baltes, P.B. (2003). The Fate of cognition in very old age: six-years longitudinal findings in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). Psyhology and Aging. 18. 318
• Sperber, D. (2001). An Evolutionary Perspective on Testimony and Argumentation. Philosophical Topics. 29. 401
• Sperber, D.,Clément, F.,Heintz, C.,Mascaro, O.,Mercier, H.,Origgi, G.. (2010). Epistemic Vigilance. Mind and Language. 25. 359
• Sperber, D.,Mercier, H. (2012). Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.
• Stanovich, K.E. (2010). Rationality and Reflective Mind.
• Stanovich, K.E.,Toplak, M.E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Mind and Society. 11. 3-13
• Wingfield, A.,Stine-Morrow, E.A.L. (2000). The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. 2. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.