Contextualising Third-Wave Historical Sociolinguistics.

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Agha, A. (2003). The social life of a cultural value. Language and Communication, 23, 231–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0
• Agha, A. (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropolo-gy, 15 (1), 38–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38
• Agha, A. (2006). Language and Social Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618284.
• Alexandropoulos, G. (2015). Stylistic devices of Christians expressing contradiction against the Gentiles. In C. Russi (Ed.), Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics. (pp. 19–45). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110488401-005
• Auer, A. (2015). Stylistic variation. In A. Auer, D. Schreier & R. Watts (Eds.), Letter Writ-ing and Language Change. (pp.133–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139088275.009
• Beal, J. C. (2019). Enregisterment and historical sociolinguistics. In S. Jansen & L. Siebers (Eds.), Processes of Change. Studies in Late Modern and Present-Day English. (pp.7–23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.21.02bea
• Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740450001037X
• Bell, A. (2007). Style in dialogue: Bakhtin and sociolinguistic theory. In R. Bayley (Ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications. (pp. 90–109). Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619496.006
• Bourdieu, P. & Boltanski, L. (1975). Le fetichisme de la langue. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 4, 2–32.
• Bucholtz, M. (2009). From stance to style: gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. (pp. 146–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0007
• Conde-Silvestre, J. C. (2016). A ‘third-wave’ historical sociolinguistic approach to late Middle English correspondence: evidence from the Stonor Letters. In C. Russi (Ed.), Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics (pp. 46–66). Warsaw/Berlin: Open De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110488401-006.
• Cook, H.M. (1996). Japanese language socialization: indexing the modes of self. Dis-course Processes, 22: 171–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544971
• Coupland, N. (1996). Hark, hark the lark: multiple voicing in DJ talk. In D. Graddol, D. Leith, & J. Swann (Eds.), English: History, Diversity and Change. (pp. 325–330). London/New York: Routledge and Open University.
• Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: the emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100.
• Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490.
• Elspaß, S. (2012). The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In J. M. Hernández-Campoy & J. C. Conde-Silvestre (Eds.), The Handbook of Histori-cal Sociolinguistics. (pp. 156–169). Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch9.
• Fowler, R. (1981). Literature as Social Discourse. London: Batsford.
• García-Vidal, T. (2023). Patterns of stylistic variation in the use of synthetic and analytic comparative adjectives: evidence from private letters in sixteenth- to eighteenth-century England. In M. Schiegg & J. Huber (Eds.), Intra-Writer Variation in Histori-cal Sociolinguistics. (pp. 107– 132). Oxford, United Kingdom: Peter Lang Verlag.
• Giles, H. (1979). Sociolinguistics and social psychology: an introductory essay. In H. Giles & R. St Clair (Eds.), Language and Social Psychology. (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Havinga, A. D. (2021). Intra-individual variation in nineteenth-century private letters. In A. Werth, L. Bülow, S. E. Pfenninger & M. Schiegg (Eds.), Intra- Individual Varia-tion in Language. (pp. 315–346). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110743036-010
• Hernández-Campoy, J. M. (2016). Sociolinguistic Styles. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118737606
• Hernández-Campoy, J. M. (2018). Sociolinguistic patterns of stylistic variation: motiva-tions and mechanisms. In M. B. Hernández, M. Brito & T. Monterrey (Eds.), Broad-ening Horizons: A Peak Panorama of English Studies in Spain. (pp. 31–62). La La-guna: Universidad de La Laguna.
• Hernández-Campoy, J.M. (2023). Intra-writer variation and the real world of epistolary interaction in historical sociolinguistics: John Paston I’s use of the orthographic var-iable (TH). In M. Schiegg & J. Huber (Eds.), Intra-Writer Variation in Historical So-ciolinguistics. (pp. 85– 105). Oxford, United Kingdom: Peter Lang Verlag.
• Hernández-Campoy, J.M. & Conde-Silvestre, J. C. (2015). Assessing variability and change in Early English letters. In A. Auer, D, Schreier & R, J. Watts (Eds.), Letter Writing and Language Change (pp.14–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139088275.003
• Hernández-Campoy, J.M., Conde-Silvestre, J.C. & García-Vidal, T. (2019). Tracing pat-terns of intra-speaker variation in early English correspondence: a change from above in the Paston Letters. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 54, 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0014
• Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Cutillas-Espinosa, J. A. (2010). Speaker design practices in political discourse: a case study. Language and Communication, 30, 297–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.07.001
• Hernández‐Campoy, J.M. & Cutillas‐Espinosa, J.A. (2012) Introduction: style‐shifting revisited. In J.M. Hernández‐Campoy & J.A. Cutillas‐Espinosa (Eds.), Style‐Shifting in Public: New Perspectives on Stylistic Variation (pp. 1–18). Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.9.01cam
• Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & García-Vidal, T. (2018a). Persona management and identity projection in English medieval society: evidence from John Paston II. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics, 4(1), 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0027
• Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & García-Vidal, T. (2018b). Style-shifting and accommodative competence in late Middle English written correspondence: putting audience design to the test of time. Folia Linguistica Historica, 39 (2), 383–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2018-0014
• Johnstone, B. (1996). The Linguistic Individual: Self‐expression in Language and Linguis-tics. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195101843.001.0001
• Johnstone, B. (2000). The individual voice in language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 405–425.
• Johnstone, B. (2009). Stance, style and the linguistic individual. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. (pp. 29–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0002
• Johnstone, B. (2010). Indexing the local. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Handbook of Language and Globalization. (pp. 386–405). Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell.
• Johnstone, B. (2011). Dialect enregisterment in performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(5), 657–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00512.x
• Kaislaniemi, S. (2017). The early English East India Company as a community of practice: evidence of multilingualism. In M. Wagner, B. Beinhoff, & B. Outhwaite (Eds.), Merchants of Innovation: The Languages of Traders. Studies in Language Change (Vol. 15). (pp. 132–157). Berlin, Munich, & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503542-007
• Kiesling, S.F. (2005). Variation, stance, and style: word‐final ‐er, high rising tone, and ethnicity in Australian English. English World Wide, 26, 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.26.1.02kie
• Kopaczyk, J. & Jucker, A. (Eds). (2013). Communities of Practice in the History of Eng-lish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.235
• Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
• Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Le Page, R.B., & Tabouret‐Keller A. (1985). Acts of Identity: Creole‐based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Milroy, L. & Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758359
• Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: a language socialization perspective. Re-search on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
• Podesva, R.J. (2012). Variation and agency. In P. Seargeant & J. Swann (Eds.), English in the World: History, Diversity, Change. (pp. 323–329). Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University and Routledge.
• Rickford, J.R., and P. Eckert. (2001). Introduction. In P. Eckert & J. Rickford (Eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613258.001
• Romaine, S. (1982). Socio-historical Linguistics: Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sankoff, D. & Laberge, S. (1978). The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In D. Sankoff (Ed.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods. (pp. 239–250). New York: Academic Press.
• Schiegg, M. (2018). Factors of intra- speaker variation in nineteenth-century lower-class writing. In A. Auer & M. Laitinen (Eds.), Special Issue ‘Mobility, Variability and Changing Literacies’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 119 (1), 101– 20.
• Schiegg, M. (2022). Flexible Schreiber in der Sprachgeschichte. Intraindividuelle Varia-tion in Patientenbriefen (1850– 1936). Heidelberg: Winter.
• Schiegg, M., Huber, J. (2023). Intra-Writer Variation in Historical Sociolinguistics. Ox-ford, United Kingdom: Peter Lang Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b19157.
• Schilling, N. (2013) Investigating stylistic variation. In J.K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. (2nd ed.). (pp. 327–349). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118335598.ch15
• Schleef, E. (2020). Identity and indexicality in the study of World Englishes. In D. Schreier, M. Hundt & E. Schneider (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of World Eng-lishes. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics (pp. 609–632). Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108349406.026.
• Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2
• Silverstein, M. (2004). “Cultural” concepts and the language‐culture nexus. Current An-thropology, 45, 621–52.
• Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2005). Of social networks and linguistic influence: the lan-guage of Robert Lowth and his correspondents. International Journal of English Studies, 5(1), 135–157.
• Timofeeva, O. (2022). Sociolinguistic Variation in Old English: Records of Communities and People. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org./10.1075/ahs.13
• Van der Wal, M. J. & Rutten, G. (2013). Ego- documents in a historical-sociolinguistic perspective. In M. J. van der Wal & G. Rutten (Eds), Touching the Past: Studies in the Historical Sociolinguistics of Ego- Documents. (pp. 1– 17). Amsterdam: Benja-mins.
• Voeste, A. (2018). The self as a source. A peasant farmer’s letters from prison (1848–1852). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics, 4(1), 97–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2017-0011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2017-0011
• Wenger, É. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
• Werth, A., Bülow, L., Pfenninger, S. E. & Schiegg, M. (Eds). (2021). Intra- Individual Variation in Language. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110743036