Efficiency in the estimation of technical coefficients and interregional multipliersthe Jahn methodology versus the GRAS and Gravity-RAS methodologie

Referencias bibliográficas

• Arto, I., Rueda-Cantuche, J. M., & Peters, G. P. (2014). Comparing the gtap-mrio and wiod databases for carbon footprint analysis. Economic Systems Research, 26(3), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.939949
• Bakhtiari, S., & Dehghanizadeh, M. (2012). Proposing a new version of location quotients for estimating regional input-output coefficients: A case study of Iran’s Yazd province. African Journal of Business Management, 6(23), 6903–6909. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2934
• Boero, R., Edwards, B. K., & Rivera, M. K. (2018). Regional input-output tables and trade flows: an integrated and interregional non-survey approach. Regional Studies, 52(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1286009
• Bonfiglio, A. (2009). On the parameterization of techniques for representing regional economic structures. Economic Systems Research, 21(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310902995727
• Boomsma, P., & Oosterhaven, J. (1992). A double-entry method for the construction of bi-regional inputoutput tables. Journal of Regional Science, 32(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9787.1992.tb00186.x
• Buendía, J.D., Martínez, R., & Sánchez, M.M. (2022). A new proposal to model regional input–output structures using location quotients. An application to Korean and Spanish regions. Papers in Regional Science, 101(5), 1201-1237. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/pirs.12692
• Cai, M. (2020). Doubly constrained gravity models for interregional trade estimation. Papers in Regional Science, 100(2), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12581
• Cai, M. (2022). A calibrated gravity model of interregional trade. Spatial Economic Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2022.2081715
• Dietzenbacher, E., & Miller, R.E. (2009). Ras-ing the transactions or the coefficients: It makes no difference. Journal of Regional Science, 49(3), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9787.2008.00598.x
• Flegg, A. T., Webber, C. D., & Elliott, M. V. (1995). On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input—Output Tables. Regional Studies, 29(6), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409512331349173
• Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (1997). On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: Reply. Regional Studies, 31(8), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/713693401
• Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2013). Regional Input-Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland. Regional Studies, 47(5), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.592138
• Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2019). The regionalization of national input-output tables: A study of South Korean regions. Papers in Regional Science, 98(2), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12364
• Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (1997). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables: reply. Regional Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713693401
• Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (2000). Regional size, regional specialization and the FLQ formula. Regional Studies, 34(6), 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050085675
• Flegg, A. T., Webber, C. D., & Elliott, M. V. (1997). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input–output tables. Regional Studies, 31(8), 795–805. https://rsa.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409512331349173
• Flegg, A. T, Huang, Y., & Tohmo, T. (2014). Cross-hauling and regional input-output tables: the case of the province of Hubei, China (No. 1310; Economics Working Paper Series).
• Flegg, A. T, Lamonica, G. R., Chelli, F. M., Recchioni, M. C., & Tohmo, T. (2021). A new approach to modelling the input – output structure of regional economies using non survey methods. In Journal of Economic Structures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-021-00242-8
• Flegg, A. T, Mastronardi, L. J., & Romero, C. A. (2014). Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula for regionalizing national input-output tables: The case of the Province of Córdoba, Argentina Economics Working Paper Series Empirical Evidence on the Use of the FLQ Formula for Regionalizing National Input.
• Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2019). The regionalization of national input-output tables: A study of South Korean regions: Papers and Proceedings. Papers in Regional Science, 98(2), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12364
• Fournier, J. G. (2020). On the accuracy of gravity-RAS approaches used for inter-regional trade estimation: evidence using the 2005 inter-regional input–output table of Japan. Economic Systems Research, 5314(4), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2020.1753662
• Greaney, T. M., & Kiyota, K. (2020). The Gravity Model and Trade in Intermediate Inputs (Issue January).
• Günlük-Senesen, G., & Bates, J. M. (1988). Some Experiments with Methods of Adjusting Unbalanced Data Matrices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 151(3), 473. https://doi.org/10.2307/2982995
• Hermannsson, K. (2016). Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables. Spatial Economic Analysis, 11(3), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2016.1177194
• Holý, V., & Å afr, K. (2022) Disaggregating input–output tables by the multidimensional RAS method: a case study of the Czech Republic. Economic Systems Research, https://doi/10.1080/09535314.2022.2091978
• Holt, J. (2017). Approaches to estimating regional input-output tables June 2017 (Issue June).
• Huang, W., Kobayashi, S., & Tanji, H. (2008). Updating an input–output matrix with sign-preservation: Some improved objective functions and their solutions. Economic Systems Research, 20, 111– 123.
• Isard, W. (1951). Interregional and regional input-output analysis: a model of a space-economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1926459
• Isard, W. (1960). Methods of Regional Analysis: an Introduction to Regional Science. The Technology Press of MIT and John Wiley and Sons.
• Isard, W., Azis, I. J., Drennan, M. P., Miller, R. E., Saltzman, S., & , Thorbecke, E. (2017). Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis. In Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249056
• Jackson, R. W., & Murray, A. T. (2004). Alternative input-output matrix updating formulations. Economic Systems Research, 16(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000219268
• Jahn, M. (2017). Extending the FLQ formula: a location quotient-based interregional input–output framework. Regional Studies, 51(10), 1518–1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1198471
• Jahn, M., Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2020). Testing and implementing a new approach to estimating interregional output multipliers using input–output data for South Korean regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 1772(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2020.1720918
• Junius, T., & Oosterhaven, J. (2003). The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Economic Systems Research, 15(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531032000056954
• Kowalewski, J. (2015). Regionalization of National Input–Output Tables: Empirical Evidence on the Use of the FLQ Formula. Regional Studies, 49(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.766318
• Kratena, K., Streicher, G., Temurshoev, U., Amores, A. F., Arto, I., Mongelli, I., Neuwahl, F., RuedaCantuche, J. M., & Andreoni, V. (2013). FIDELIO 1: Fully Interregional Dynamic Econometric Long-term Input-Output Model for the EU27. In JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. https://doi.org/10.2791/17619
• Krebs, O. (2020). RIOTs in Germany Constructing an interregional input-output table for Germany. In papers.ssrn.com. https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-40407
• Lamonica, G. R., & Chelli, F. M. (2018). The performance of non-survey techniques for constructing sub-territorial input-output tables. Papers in Regional Science, 97(4), 1169–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12297
• Lampiris, G., Karelakis, C., & Loizou, E. (2019). Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1–2), 225–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03337-5
• Lemelin, A. (2009). A GRAS variant solving for minimum information loss. Economic Systems Research, 21, 399– 408.
• Lenzen, M., Gallego, B., & Wood, R. (2006). A flexible approach to matrix balancing under partial information. Journal of Applied Iput–Output Analysis, 11 & 12, 1– 24.
• Lenzen, M., Gallego, B., & Wood, R. (2009). Matrix balancing under conflicting information. Economic Systems Research, 21(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310802688661
• Lenzen, M., Moran, D. D., Geschke, A., & Kanemoto, K. (2014). A non-sign-preserving RAS variant. Economic Systems Research, 26(2), 197– 208.
• Lenzen, M., Wood, R., & Gallego, B. (2007). Some comments on the GRAS method. Economic Systems Research, 19(4), 461– 465.
• Mastronardi, L. J., & Romero, C. A. (2012). A non-survey estimation for regional input-output tables. An application for Buenos Aires City. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37006/
• McCann, P., & Dewhurst, J. H. (1998). Regional size, industrial location and input-output expenditure coefficients. In Regional Studies (Vol. 32, Issue 5).
• Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-Output Analysis Foundations and Extensions Second Edition. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=viHaAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR24&dq=location+ quotient+input+output&ots=grBketkUaV&sig=Hm7oeCN4HiqUTtPq58BtTz9dWZI
• Mínguez, R., Oosterhaven, J., & Escobedo, F. (2009). Cell-corrected RAS method (CRAS) for updating or regionalizing an input-output matrix. Journal of Regional Science, 49(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00594.x
• Oosterhaven, J., Piek, G., & Stelder, D. (1986). Theory and practice of updating regional versus interregional interindustry tables. Papers in Regional Science, 59(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1986.tb00982.x
• Paelinck, J., & Waelbroeck, J. (1963). Etude empirique sur l'évolution de coefficients ‘input–output’: essai d'application de la procédure RAS de Cambridge au tableau industriel belge. Economie Appliquee, 16, 81– 111.
• Pereira-López, X., Carrascal, A., & Fernández, M. (2013). Advances in updating input-output tables: its relevance for the analysis of regional economies. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 33, 3-12.
• Pereira-López, X., Sánchez-Chóez, N.G., & Fernández-Fernández, M. (2021) Performance of bidimensional location quotients for constructing input–output tables. Journal of Economic Structures 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-021-00237-5
• Pereira-López, X., Sánchez-Chóez, N.G., & Fernández-Fernández, M. (2022). Spotting Error Patterns in Input–Output Projections Using Location Quotients. Mathematics, 10, 1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091474
• Ramos, M. C. (1998). Estimación Indirecta de Coeficientes Input-Output (153/98).
• Riddington, G., Gibson, H., & Anderson, J. (2006). Comparison of gravity model, survey and location quotient-based local area tables and multipliers. Regional Studies, 40(9), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601047374
• Round, J. I. (1983). Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the theory and the Evidence. International Regional Science Review, 8(3), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001768300800302
• Sargento, A. L. M. (2007). Empirical examination of the gravity model in two different contexts: Estimation and explanation. Jahrbuch Fur Regionalwissenschaft, 27(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-007-0013-8
• Sargento, A. L.M. (2009). Regional input-output tables and models Interregional trade estimation and inputoutput modelling based on total use rectangular tables. Universidade de Coimbra.
• Sargento, A. L. M., Ramos, P. N., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2012). Inter-regional trade flow estimation through non-survey models: An empirical assessment. Economic Systems Research, 24(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2011.574609
• Schaffer, W. A., & Chu, K. (1969). Nonsurvey techniques for constructing regional interindustry models. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 23(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01941876
• Stone, R. (1961). Input-Output and National Accounts. Paris. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
• Temursho, U., Oosterhaven, J., & Cardenete, M. A. (2021). A multiregional generalized RAS updating technique. Spatial Economic Analysis, 16 (3), 271-28.
• Temurshoev, U., Miller, R. E., & Bouwmeester, M. C. (2013). A note on the GRAS method. Economic Systems Research, 25(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.746645
• Temurshoev, U., & Timmer, M. P. (2010). Joint Estimation of Supply and Use Tables Joint Estimation of Supply and Use Tables * (GD-116). www.wiod.org
• Temurshoev, U., & Timmer, M. P. (2011). Joint estimation of supply and use tables. Papers in Regional Science, 90(4), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00345.x
• Thissen, M., Di Comite, F., Kancs, A., & Potters, L. (2014). Modelling Inter-Regional Trade Flows Data and Methodological Issues in RHOMOLO Working Papers A series of short papers on regional research and indicators produced by the Directorate-General for Regional Policy. https://doi.org/10.2776/871154
• Többen, J., & Kronenberg, T. H. (2015). Construction of multi-regional input–output tables using the charm method. Economic Systems Research, 27(4), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2015.1091765
• Valderas-Jaramillo, J. M., Rueda, J. M., Olmedo, E., & Beutel, J. (2019). Projecting supply and use tables: new variants and fair comparisons. Economic Systems Research, 31(3) 423-444 https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1545221
• ValderasJaramillo, J.M., Amores, A.F., Oliva-Mora, J.R., & Boniquito-Fernández, S. (2019). Provincialización de tablas de Origen y Destino mediante SUT-RAS tridimensional (3D-SUT-RAS): desarrollo y aplicación al caso andaluz. VIII Jornadas de Análisis input–output, organized by the Hispanoamerican Society of input–output Analysis (SHAIO), https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25012.37763
• Valderas-Jaramillo, J. M. (2015). Actualización de marcos input-output a través de métodos de proyección. Estudio, aplicación y evaluación empírica en tablas de origen y de destino a precios básicos de vario países de la Unión Europea. Universidad de Sevilla.
• Valderas-Jaramillo, J. M., & Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. (2021). The multidimensional nD-GRAS method: Applications for the projection of multiregional input–output frameworks and valuation matrices. Papers in Regional Science, 100, 1599–1624.
• Wang, Z., & Canning, P. (2004). A Flexible Modeling Framework to Estimate Interregional Trade Patterns and Input-Output Accounts. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3359
• Yamada, M. (2015). Construction of a multi-regional input-output table for Nagoya metropolitan area, Japan. Journal of Economic Structures, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-015-0022-7
• Zhao, X., & Choi, S. G. (2015). On the regionalization of input–output tables with an industry-specific location quotient. Annals of Regional Science, 54(3), 901–926.