Evaluación socioeconómica y de los servicios ecosistémicos en el Parque Regional de las Salinas y Arenales de San Pedro del Pinatar (Murcia, SE España)

  1. Hernández Marmol, Diana 1
  2. Ballesteros Pelegrín, Gustavo A. 2
  3. Belmonte Serrato, Francisco 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Revista:
Anales de geografía de la Universidad Complutense

ISSN: 0211-9803

Any de publicació: 2024

Volum: 44

Número: 1

Pàgines: 107-130

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5209/AGUC.94205 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Anales de geografía de la Universidad Complutense

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

This protected space offers 32 ecosystem services and different economic activities are carried out. With the aim of identifying the preferences and economic valuation of the agents who carry out their activity and/or are involved in its conservation, 6 survey models were developed in two blocks, one with specific questions for each type of agent and another with questions identical, where the most relevant ecosystem services can be classified from 1 to 5 and give an economic value. 2,364 respondents participated, 62.3% are unaware of the concept of ecosystem service and 25.3% would be willing to pay €5 to access the Park. The ecosystem service considered most important was the “maintenance of habitats where all species live”, of which 28.1% would make a contribution of €7.5/year for its conservation. In conclusion, this work contributes to knowing what value stakeholders give to the services offered by ecosystems.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Armenteras, D., González, T. M., Vergara, L.K., Luque, F.J., Rodríguez, N., & Bonilla, M.A. (2016): Revisión del concepto de ecosistema como “unidad de la naturaleza” 80 años después de su formulación: Ecosistemas, 25(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.2016.25-1.12
  • Asociación de Naturalistas del Sureste. (2022): El proyecto Resalar permitirá recuperar la actividad salinera y biodiversidad de Marchamalo en el Mar Menor. https://www.asociacionanse.org/el-proyecto-resalar-permitira-recuperar-la-actividad-salinera-y-biodiversidad-de-marchamalo-en-el-mar-menor/20220718/
  • Cáceres, D.M., E., Tapella, F., Quétier, and S. Díaz (2015): The social value of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the perspectives of different social actors. Ecology and Society 20(1): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07297-200162
  • Convenio de Diversidad Biológica (2004): Enfoque por ecosistemas. (Directrices del CDB). Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. Montreal, Canada. Disponible en: https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/ea-text-es.pdf.
  • Cowling, R.M., Egoh, B., Knight, A.T., O’Farrell, P.J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., et al. (2008): An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (28), 9483–9488. doi:10.1073/ pnas.0706559105
  • Currie, W.S. (2011): Tansley review. Units of nature or processes across scales? The ecosystem concept at age 75. New Phytologist 190: 21-34
  • De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L. y Willemen L. (2010): Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
  • Del Val, C. (2007): El muestreo: métodos y aplicaciones. En: Gutierres, J.; Agudo, Y.; Aranda, E.; Callejo, J., Del Val, C., Huescar, A., Romero, C. y Viedma, A. La investigación social del turismo. Perspectivas y aplicaciones, Ed. Paraninfo. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=555984
  • Geneletti, D., Adem Esmail, B., Cortinovis, C., Arany, I., Balzan, M., Van Beukering, P., Bicking, S., Borges, P.A., Borisova, B., Broekx, S., Burkhard, B., Gil, A., Inghe, O., Kopperoinen, L., Kruse, M., Liekens, I., Lowicki, D., Mizgajski, A., Mulder, S., Nedkov, S., Ostergard, H., Picanço, A., Ruskule, A., Santos-Martín, F., Sieber, I.M., Svensson, J., Vačkářů, D., Veidemane, K. (2020): Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies. One Ecosystem 5: e53111. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111
  • Hernández Mármol, D., Ballesteros Pelegrín G.A., & Belmonte Serrato, F. (2021): Identificación y valoración de los Servicios Ecosistémicos del Parque Regional de las Salinas y Arenales de San Pedro del Pinatar (Murcia, España) basado en encuestas a los usuarios. Investigaciones Geográficas, in press. https://doi.org/10.14198/INGEO.16867
  • Labandeira, X., León, C.J. y Vázquez M.J. (2007): Economía Ambiental. PEARSON EDUCACIÓN, S.A., Madrid. ISBN 10: 84-205-3651-2. ISBN 13: 978-84-205-3651-4
  • Marta-Pedroso, C., Laporta, L., Gama, I., Domingos, T. (2018): Economic valuation and mapping Ecosystem Services in the context of protected area management (Natural Park of Serra de São Mamede, Portugal). One Ecosystem 3: e26722. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e26722
  • Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., et al. (2012): Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., Montes, C. (2014): Trade-offs across valuedomains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators, 27, 220–228.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003): Ecosystems and Human Well-being. A Framework for assessment. Washington: Island Press. Recuperado de http://pdf.wri.org/ecosystems_human_wellbeing.pdf
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005): Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. Recuperado de https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
  • R Core Team. (2020): R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Ripka de Almeida, A., Luiz da Silva, C., & Hernández Santoyo, A. (2018): Métodos de valoración económica ambiental:instrumentos para el desarrollo de politicas ambientales. Universidad y Sociedad, 10(1), 134-141. Recuperado de http://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus
  • Sánchez-Balibrea, J.M. y Martínez-Arnal, N. (Coord.) (2022): Custodia del territorio en explotaciones salineras. Edita: Asociación de Naturalistas del Sureste. 108 págs. Recuperado de https://lifesalinas.es/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Manual-Custodia-Territorio.pdf
  • Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S. y Schmidt, S. (2011): A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol., 48, 630-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
  • Taherdoost, H. (2017): Determining Sample Size; How to Calculate Survey Sample Size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, Vol. 2, 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3224205
  • Tansley, A.G. (1935): The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16 (3): 284-307.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet