Desinformación de géneroanálisis de los bulos de Maldito Feminismo

  1. Paula Herrero-Diz 1
  2. Marta Pérez-Escolar 1
  3. Juan Francisco Plaza Sánchez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Loyola Andalucía
    info

    Universidad Loyola Andalucía

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0075gfd51

Journal:
Icono14

ISSN: 1697-8293

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Comunicación y Educación en un mundo digital y conectado

Volume: 18

Issue: 2

Pages: 188-216

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7195/RI14.V18I2.1509 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Icono14

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Information disorder (satire or parody, false connections, misleading content, false context, imposter content, manipulated content or fabricated content) is a so-cial problem that is causing collective damages. Women, in particular, are becoming victims of hostilities on the digital scenario. This problem is currently known as “dig-ital sexism” and “gender disinformation”. In this context, verification journalism, a trendy format, aims to reduce the effects of hoaxes introducing the fact-checking process in its professional routines. However, this is still a minority task. In order to contribute to the study of the disinformation phenomenon in relation to online mes-sages about women, this research has developed a systematic tool to classify hoaxes that have been refuted by the platform Maldita.es, specifically, on its sections Maldi-to Feminismo (N=71). This tool, inspired by the taxonomies created by Derakhshan & Wardle (2017), Tandoc, Lim & Ling (2018) and Molina, Sundar, Le & Lee (2019), allows you to categorize fake news according to the type of information disorder, the agent, the message and the interpreter.The results of this study (internal validity) show that hoaxes detected by Maldito Feminismo are misleading content that expect to damage feminism (this is the main topic of fake news) and have a political purpose. These information disorders are displayed in text format and are mainly created and distributed on social networks. Moreover, although users collaborate and participate detecting and reporting hoaxes, the platform Maldito Feminismo identifies, locates and denounces most of the fake news.

Bibliographic References

  • Ajder, H., Patrini, G., Cavalli, F. & Cullen, L. (2019). The state of deepfakes landscape, threats, and impact. Ámsterdam: Deeptrace. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/35FD9jA
  • Bardin, L. (1991). Análisis de contenido (Vol. 89). Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
  • Barranquero, A. & Meda, M. (2015). Los medios comunitarios y alternativos en el ciclo de protestas ciudadanas desde el 15M. Athenea Digital, 15(1), 139-170. doi: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1385
  • Bedau, H. A. (1961). On civil disobedience. The Journal of Philosophy, 58(21), 653-665. doi: 10.2307/2023542
  • Brandtzaeg, P. B., Lüders, M., Spangenberg, J., Rath-Wiggins, L. & Følstad, A. (2016). Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media. Journalism Practice, 10(3), 323-342. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2015.1020331
  • Carreón, R. C. & Garza, V. S. (2016) Percepción del feminismo entre hombres y mujeres. Revista Status, 1(1), 76-99
  • Comisión Europea (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/37TYo2T
  • Conroy, N. J., Rubin, V. L. & Chen, Y. (2015). Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082
  • Consejo del Audiovisual de Cataluña (2018). Las fake news en Internet. El discurso de género. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/33F4Jfy
  • Coromina, O. & Padilla, A. (2018). Análisis de las desinformaciones del referéndum del 1 de octubre detectadas por Maldito Bulo. Quaderns del CAC, 21(44), 17-26.
  • De Miguel, A. A. (2008). Feminismo y juventud en las sociedades formalmente igualitarias. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, (83), 29-45.
  • Derakhshan, H. & Wardle, C. (2017). Information Disorder: Definitions. AA. VV., Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 5-12. University of Pennsylvania: Annenberg School for Communication.
  • Domínguez, H. (2015). Activismo mediático en los albores de Internet: el caso del movimiento Okupa de Barcelona. COMMONS. Revista de Comunicación y Ciudadanía Digital, 4(2), 93-123.
  • Echevarría, B. (2016). Más fact-checking contra la «posverdad». Cuadernos de periodistas, 33, 9-16.
  • Eurobarómetro (2018). Flash Eurobarometer 464: Fake News and Disinformation Online Bruxelles: Eurobarometer. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/35PUTbQ
  • Fabry, M. (2017, 24 de agosto). Here’s How the First Fact-Checkers Were Able to Do Their Jobs Before the Internet. Time. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/35FEdnA
  • Fernández, D., Corredor, P. & Santín, M. (2011). Nuevos espacios de comunicación, relación y activismo en la era digital: la Red como oportunidad para el feminismo. Asparkía, 22, pp. 61-72.
  • Fox, D. (1981). El proceso de investigación en educación. Pamplona: Eunsa.
  • García Aguilar, M. D. C. (2015). Feminismo contemporáneo: más allá de la posmodernidad. PALOBRA," palabra que obra", 14(14), pp. 158-172.
  • Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies,10(2), pp. 147-166. doi: 10.1177/1367549407075898
  • Global Disinformation Index (2019). The Quarter Billion Dollar Question: How is Disinformation Gaming Ad Tech? Recuperado de https://bit.ly/380DnUu
  • Graves, L. (2013). Deciding what's true: Fact-checking journalism and the new ecology of news (Doctoral dissertation). Nueva York: Columbia University.
  • Graves, L., Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2016). Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 102-138. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12198
  • Graves, L. (2017). Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(3), 518-537. doi: 10.1111/cccr.12163
  • Habermas, J. (2002). Ensayos políticos. Barcelona: Ediciones península.
  • Hammer, R. y Kellner, D. (2009). Third wave feminism. Sexualities and the adventures of the posts. En E. A. Roustang-Stoller (ed.), Women in the public sphere (pp. 219-234). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillian.
  • Hermida, A. (2015). Nothing but the truth: Redrafting the journalistic boundary of verification. En M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (eds.), Boundaries of journalism. Professionalism, Practices and Participation (pp. 37-50). Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Johnson, T., Bichard, S. & Zhang, W. (2009). Communication Communities or “CyberGhettos?”: A Path Analysis Model Examining Factors that Explain Selective Exposure to Blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), pp. 60-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01492.x
  • Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. California: Sage publications.
  • Lazar, M. M. (2009). Communicating (post)feminisms in discourse. Revista Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 339-344. doi: 10.1177/1750481309343856
  • Lewis, R. & Marwick, A. (2017). Taking the Red Pill: Ideological Motivations for Spreading Online. Understanding the Structure and Dynamics of Disinformation in the Online Information Ecosystem, 18-22. University of Pennsylvania: Annenberg School for Communication. doi: 10.1080/15401383.2016.1249815
  • Magallón, R. (2018). La biblioteca digital sobre Donald Trump. Fact-checking frente a fake news. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 24(1), 273-282. doi: 10.5209/ESMP.59949
  • Magaloni, B. (1990). La desobediencia civil en la democracia constitucional. Estudios, (22), 17-46.
  • Marcone, J. (2009). Las razones de la desobediencia civil en las sociedades democráticas. Andamio, 5(10), 39-69.
  • Mastretta, A. (2004). El cielo de los leones. Barcelona: Seix Barral Biblioteca Breve
  • McAdams, M. (2020). Digital girl: cyberfeminism and the emancipatory potential of digital entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Small Business Economy, pp. 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00301-2
  • McRobbie, A. (2007). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. California: Sage Publications.
  • Moghaddam, R. (2019). Struggle for Equality: From the constitutional revolution to cyber feminism with a focus on the role of new media in the women’s movement in Iran (Ph.D thesis). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
  • Molina, J. P. & Magallón, R. (2019). Procedimientos para verificar y desmontar informaciones falsas basadas en el discurso del odio. El caso de Maldita Migración. RAEIC, Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación, 6(12), 95-122.
  • Molina, M. D., Sundar, S. S., Le, T. & Lee, D. (2019). “Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content. American Behavioral Scientist, 1-33. doi: 10.1177/0002764219878224
  • Núñez Puente, S. (2016). FEMEN, ciberfeminismo, democracia radical y la política del cuerpo. En V. Martín & D. Etura (eds.), La comunicación en clave de igualdad de género (pp. 41-56.). Madrid: Fragua.
  • Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2015). Estimating fact-checking’s effects. Arlington, VA: American Press Institute.
  • Occeñola, P. (2018). Fake news real women: Disinformation gone macho. When disinformation is weaponized against women, misogyny rears its ugly head. Rappler. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/35OkphW
  • Pal, A. & Banerjee, S. (2019). Understanding Online Falsehood From the Perspective of Social Problem. En I. E. Chiluwa & S. A. Samoilenko (eds.), Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online (pp. 1-17). Hershey (EEUU): IGI Global.
  • Pardy, N. (2018, 3 de mayo). How The Fake News Industry Weaponizes Women. Refinery29. Recuperado de https://r29.co/2L7jzF3 Plant, S. (1998). Zeros and Ones: Digital Women + th e New Technoculture. London: Fourth Estate.
  • Press, A. P. (2011). "Feminism? That’s so seventies’": Girls and young women discuss femininity and feminism in America’s next top model. En R. Gill y C. Scharff (eds.), New femininities, postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity (pp. 117- 133). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rawls, J. (1979). Teoría de la justicia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Rovira, G. (2013). Activismo mediático y criminalización de la protesta: medios y movimientos sociales en México. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 20(61), 35-60.
  • Sobieraj, S. (2018). Bitch, slut, skank, cunt: Patterned resistance to women’s visibility in digital publics. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1700-1714. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348535
  • Stabile, B., Grant, A., Purohit, H. & Harris, K. (2019). Sex, Lies, and Stereotypes: Gendered Implications of Fake News for Women in Politics. Public Integrity, 21(5), 491-502. doi: 10.1080/10999922.2019.1626695
  • Steinem, G. (2016). Mi vida en la carretera. Salamanca: Alpha Decay.
  • Stencel, M. & Luther. J. (2019, 21 de octubre). Reporters’ Lab fact-checking tally tops 200. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2Dun9ET
  • Tandoc Jr, E. C., Lim, Z. W. & Ling, R. (2018). Defining ‘fake news’ A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6, 137-153. doi: 0.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
  • Thoureau, H. D. (2002). Del deber de la desobediencia civil. Palma de Mallorca: Jose J. de Olañeta
  • Valera, N. (2013). Feminismo para principiantes. Barcelona: Sipan Barcelona Network S. L.
  • Wichels, S. (2019). “Femenina, sí. feminista, no.” Demonización del feminismo en blogs portugueses. En J. C. Suárez Villegas, S. Marín Conejo & P. Panarese (eds.), Comunicación, género y educación. Representaciones y (de)construcciones (pp. 115.121). Madrid: Dykinson S.L.
Data source: Dialnet