Jigsaw Puzzle technique vs. traditional group workacademic performance and satisfaction of the university students

  1. González-Gálvez, Noelia
  2. Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel
  3. Marcos-Pardo, Pablo Jorge
Revue:
Cultura, ciencia y deporte

ISSN: 1696-5043

Année de publication: 2023

Volumen: 18

Número: 58

Pages: 69-79

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12800/CCD.V18I58.2034 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Cultura, ciencia y deporte

Résumé

Los métodos de aprendizaje alternativos como la técnica del Jigsaw Puzzle (JP) han cobrado relevancia frente a la enseñanza tradicional para promover la adquisición de las competencias en la Educación Superior. El objetivo de la presente investigación fue comparar el rendimiento acadé-mico y el grado de satisfacción de los alumnos en función de si se utilizaba la técnica JP o el trabajo en grupo tradicio-nal. Se trata de una investigación trasversal. En el estudio participaron 61 alumnos de 2º curso del Grado en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte (20.11 ± 0,43 años). En un grupo de clase se aplicó la técnica JP (n = 29) y en el otro grupo una metodología tradicional (n = 32). Tras la aplica-ción del taller se evaluó la calificación obtenida en el taller y el grado de satisfacción con la técnica utilizada. El grupo JP obtuvo una calificación (X = 8.52; DS = 0.5) y un grado de satisfacción (X = 7.28; DS = 1.5) con la técnica empleada su-perior al grupo de trabajo tradicional (calificación: X = 5.58; SD = 0.6; satisfacción: X = 6.34; SD = 1.6) de manera signifi-cativa (p˂ .001 and p = .023, respectivamente). Se encontró una correlación entre la calificación y la satisfacción (CCI = .360; p = .004). En conclusión, la realización de una sesión puntual basada en la técnica JP frente al uso de una técnica tradicional reporta mejores calificaciones y mayor satisfac-ción con el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje.

Références bibliographiques

  • Agencia Nacional de evaluación de la calidad y acreditación (ANECA). (2013). Guía de apoyo para la redacción, puesta en práctica y evaluación de los resultados del aprendizaje. Cyan Proyectos editoriales.
  • Ahadiyan, M. (2007). Introduction to educational technology. BoshraPress.
  • Ahmadi, A., Noetel, M., Parker, P., Ryan, R., Ntoumanis, N., Reeve, J., Beauchamp, M., Dicke, T., Yeung, A., Ahmadi, M., Bartholomew, K., Chiu, T. K. F., Curran, T., Erturan, G., Flunger, B., Frederick, C., Froiland, J., González-Cutre, D., Haerens, L., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). A Classification System for Teachers’ Motivational Behaviours Recommended in Self-Determination Theory Interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, in press. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4vrym
  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
  • Aronson, E., & Pantone, S. (2010). Cooperation in the Classroom: The Jigsaw Method. Pinted & Martin Ltd.
  • Beattie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392897331587
  • Brisimis, E., Krommidas, C., Syrmpas, I., Karamitrou, A., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., & Comoutos, N. (2022). Motivational Climate, Basic Psychological Needs, and Students’ Self-Talk in Physical Education. The Physical Educator, 79(3), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2022-V79-I3-10851
  • Calderón, A., Meroño, L., & MacPhail, A. (2019). A student-centred digital technology approach: The relationship between intrinsic motivation, learning climate and academic achievement of physical education pre-service teachers. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19850852
  • Cecchini, J. A., Fernandez-Rio, J., Mendez-Gimenez, A., Gonzalez, C., Sanchez-Martínez, B., & Carriedo, A. (2021). High versus low-structured cooperative learning. Effects on prospective teachers’ regulation dominance, motivation, content knowledge and responsibility. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1774548
  • Chai, C. S., Hwee Ling Koh, J., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and Modeling Teachers’ Design Beliefs and Efficacy of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for 21st Century Quality Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117752453
  • Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching Chemical Equilibrium with the Jigsaw Technique. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9047-8
  • Elliot, A. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 55–72). Guildford Press.
  • European Commission. (1997). Building the European information society for us all. Final policy report of the high-level expert group. European Communities.
  • Fertig, M. (2004). Shot Across the Bow, Stigma or Selection? The Effect of Repeating a Class on Educational Attainment. SSRN Electronic Journal, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1266, RWI: Discussion Paper No. 19, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.575381
  • Foig-Vila, R. (2018). El compromiso académico y social a través de la investigación e innovación educativa en la Enseñanza Superior. Octaedro.
  • García García, M. J., Arranz Manso, G., Blanco Cotano, J., Edwards Schachter, M., Hernández Perdomo, W., Mazadiego Martínez, L., & Piqué, R. (2011). Ecompetentis: una herramienta para la evaluación de competencias genéricas. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 8(1), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2010.6220
  • Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(03)00068-9
  • Göçer, A. (2010). A comparative research on the effectivity of cooperative learning method and jigsaw technique on teaching literary genres. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(8), 439–445.
  • González-Cutre, D., Romero-Elías, M., Jiménez-Loaisa, A., Beltrán-Carrillo, V. J., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). Testing the need for novelty as a candidate need in basic psychological needs theory. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09812-7
  • González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.036
  • González-Gálvez, N., Sagarra-Romero, L., & Ortíz-Sebastián, M. (2018). Propuesta de innovación y análisis de un caso de aprendizaje cooperativo. In D. Jiménez (Ed.), VI Buenas prácticas de innovación docente en el espacio europeo de educación superior (pp. 175–189). Colección innovación docente.
  • Hänze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004
  • Jacobs, G. M. (1997). Cooperative learning or just grouping students: The difference makes a difference. RELC Seminar. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574147.pdf
  • Jafariyan, M., Matlabi, M., Esmaeili, R., & Kianmehr, M. (2017). Effectiveness of teaching: Jigsaw technique vs lecture for medical students’ Physics course. Bali Medical Journal, 6, 529. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v6i3.400
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (2008). Cooperation in the Classrom. Interaction Book Company.
  • Kalra, R., Modi, J. N., & Vyas, R. (2015). Involving postgraduate’s students in undergraduate small group teaching promotes active learning in both. International Journal of Applied & Basic Medical Research, 5(Suppl 1), S14-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.162256
  • Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement Goals and Student Well-Being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 330–358. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.0993
  • Kimonen, E., & Nevalainen, R. (2005). Active learning in the process of educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.003
  • Kodama, N., & Koyama, J. (2016). [Jigsaw Method Is Used to Promote a First Year-student’s Understanding of Integrated Subjects at Kobe Pharmaceutical University]. Yakugaku zasshi: Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, 136(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.15-00231-3
  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
  • Leyva-Moral, J. M., & Riu Camps, M. (2016). Teaching research methods in nursing using Aronson’s Jigsaw Technique. A cross-sectional survey of student satisfaction. Nurse Education Today, 40, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.017
  • Littlewood, K. E., Shilling, A. M., Stemland, C. J., Wright, E. B., & Kirk, M. A. (2013). High-fidelity simulation is superior to case-based discussion in teaching the management of shock. Medical Teacher, 35(3), e1003-1010. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.733043
  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359
  • Manzone, J., Tremblay, L., You-Ten, K. E., Desai, D., & Brydges, R. (2014). Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training. Medical Education, 48(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12397
  • Meroño, L., Calderón, A., & Arias-Estero, J. L. (2021). Pedagogía digital y aprendizaje cooperativo: efecto sobre los conocimientos tecnológicos y pedagógicos del contenido y el rendimiento académico en formación inicial docente. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 26(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2020.10.002
  • Morrison, K., & Ieong On No, A. (2007). Does repeating a year improve performance? The case of teaching English. Educational Studies, 33(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690701423333
  • Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620001
  • Parra, F. J. (2017). La taxonomía de Bloom en el modelo Flipped Classroom. Publicaciones Didácticas, 86, 176–179. https://publicacionesdidacticas.com/hemeroteca/pd_086_sep.pdf
  • Phillips, J., & Fusco, J. (2015). Using the Jigsaw technique to teach clinical controversy in a clinical skills course. The American Journal Pharmaceutical Education, 79(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/doi:10.5688/ajpe79690
  • Prieto, A., Prieto, B., & Pino, B. (2016). Una Experiencia de flipped classroom. XXII Jornadas de Enseñanza Universitaria de La Informática (JENUI), 237–244.
  • Shaaban, K. (2006). An Initial Study of the Effects of Cooperative Learning on Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Acquisition, and Motivation to Read. Reading Psychology, 27(5), 377–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710600846613
  • Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative Learning for Academic and Social Gains: valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x
  • Snead, S. L., Walker, L., & Loch, B. (2022). Are we failing the repeating students? Characteristics associated with students who repeat first-year university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1961899
  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
  • Suárez-Cunqueiro, M. M., Gándara-Lorenzo, D., Mariño-Pérez, R., Piñeiro-Abalo, S., Pérez-López, D., & Tomás, I. (2017). Cooperative learning in “Special Needs in Dentistry” for undergraduate students using the Jigsaw approach. European Journal of Dental Education: Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 21(4), e64–e71. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12221
  • Subramanian, A., Timberlake, M., Mittakanti, H., Lara, M., & Brandt, M. L. (2012). Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format. Journal of Surgical Education, 69(4), 449–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.05.013
  • Summers, J. J., & Svinicki, M. D. (2007). Investigating classroom community in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.01.006
  • Torrego, J., & Negro, A. (2012). Aprendizaje cooperativo en las aulas. Fundamentos y recursos para su implantación. Alianza Editorial.
  • Traver, J. A., & García, R. (2004). La enseñanza-aprendizaje de la actitud de solidaridad en el aula: una propuesta de trabajo centrada en la aplicación de la técnica puzzle de Aronson. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 62(229), 419–437.
  • Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., Abenza-Cano, L., Albaladejo-Saura, M., Meroño, L., Marcos-Pardo, P. J., Esparza-Ros, F., & González-Gálvez, N. (2021). Influence of an Educational Innovation Program and Digitally Supported Tasks on Psychological Aspects, Motivational Climate, and Academic Performance. Education Sciences, 11(12), 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120821
  • Vera, M. del M. S., Fernández, I. M. S., & Calatayud, V. G. (2016). FLIPPED-TIC: Una experiencia de Flipped Classroom con alumnos de Magisterio / FLIPPED-TIC: A Flipped Classroom experience with preservice teachers. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa - RELATEC, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.15.3.69
  • Wolff, M., Wagner, M. J., Poznanski, S., Schiller, J., & Santen, S. (2015). Not another boring lecture: engaging learners with active learning techniques. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 48(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.010
  • Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2017). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916
La source de données: Dialnet