Estado de los factores condicionantes de la transferencia de la formación permanente en etapas educativas no universitarias

  1. Pamies-Berenguer, Marcial 1
  2. Cascales-Martínez, Antonia 1
  3. Gomariz Vicente, María de los Ángeles 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Revista de investigación educativa, RIE

ISSN: 0212-4068 1989-9106

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 41

Número: 2

Páginas: 417-438

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/RIE.520061 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de investigación educativa, RIE

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Teacher training programs are considered a solid and relevant pedagogical instrument. Their purpose is to act effectively on student learning and to successfully develop the teaching practice as the acquired knowledge is transferred, resulting in an application of the learning to the job position maintained over time. The main aim of this study is to investigate whether the non-university education, in which the participants of the training programs carry out their teaching work, determines the teachers’ perception of the factors that influence the transfer of training. This study uses a non-experimental descriptive design in which a survey-type instrument is used to collect cross-sectional data, following a non-probabilistic convenience sampling according to the criteria of accessibility and availability of the subjects. 4,572 teachers have participated and eight factors have been taken into account: design and development of training, self-efficacy, promotion of training by school governing bodies, feedback from students and families, environmental resources, resistance to change in the workplace, monitoring of the training institution and external locus of control. Data analysis identified the Design and development of training and Self-efficacy as strong facilitators of transfer in all types of teaching considered; the factor of Promotion of training from the center has been identified as a strong facilitator in Infant and Primary Education, in Secondary Education and Vocational Training as well as in Adult Education. This factor has been identified as a weak facilitator of transfer for language teaching and art education.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alsalamah, A., y Callinan, C. (2021). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers. Education Sciences, 11, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116
  • Baldwin, T. T., y Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988. tb00632.x
  • Baldwin, T. T., Ford, J. K., y Blume, B. D. (2017). The State of Transfer of Training Research: Moving Toward More Consumer-Centric Inquiry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1(28), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21278
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
  • Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., y Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of management, 36(4), 1065-1105. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F0149206309352880
  • Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Surface, E. A., y Olenick, J. (2019). A dynamic model of training transfer. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 270-283. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.11.004
  • Buckworth, J. (2017). Issues in the Teaching Practicum. En G. Geng, P. Smith, y P. Black (Eds.), The Challenge of Teaching (pp. 9-17). (s.l): Springer Singapore. Disponible en: https://researchers.cdu.edu.au/en/publications/issues-in-the-teaching-practicum
  • Cahapay, M. B. (2021). Kirkpatrick model: Its limitations as used in higher education evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135-144. https:// doi.org/10.21449/ijate.856143
  • Campos-García, I. (2022). ¿Por qué somos diferentes?: Directores y profesores en el epicentro de la reforma educativa española. Revista de Investigación Educativa, RIE, 40(1), 275-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.46442
  • Canto, J.L. (2016). Educación en las escuelas Normales: La formación docente en México crítica, tendencia y propuesta. Revista Educação e Emancipação, 9(2), 68-85. https:// doi.org/10.18764/2358-4319.v9n2p68-85
  • Cohen, J. (1988) (2ª. ed.). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press.
  • Coq, J. M., y Gerardin, P. (2020). Desarrollo psicológico del niño. EMC Pediatría, 55(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1245-1789(20)43834-x
  • Deckers, M., Altmann, T., y Roth, M. (2021). The influence of individual personality traits and team characteristics on training transfer: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Training and Development, 26(1), 69-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12237
  • Delacre, M., Leys, C., Mora, Y. L., y Lakens, D. (2019). Taking parametric assumptions seriously: Arguments for the use of Welch’s F-test instead of the classical F-test in one-way ANOVA. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1). https://doi. org/10.5334/irsp.198
  • De Vellis, R.F. (2003) (2.ª ed.). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
  • Escudero, J. M. (2017). La formación continua del profesorado de la educación obligatoria en el contexto español. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 21(3), 1-20. Disponible en https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/ article/view/59785/pdf_19
  • Feixas, M., Duran, M. D. M., Fernández, I., Fernández, A., García San Pedro, M. J., Márquez, M. D. y Lagos, P. (2013). ¿Cómo medir la transferencia de la formación en Educación Superior?: el Cuestionario de Factores de Transferencia. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(3), 219-248. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2013.5527
  • Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., y Prasad, J. (2018). Transfer of training: The known and the unknown. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104443
  • Ganesh, M., y Indradevi, R. (2015). Importance and effectiveness of training and development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 334-334. https://doi.org/10.5901/ mjss.2015.v6n1p334
  • García, M. I. B., Castillo, V. D. V. L., y Camacho, R. V. S. (2020). Formación docente universitaria, desde una mirada diversa y crítica de sus actores. Educación Superior, 30, 11-28. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3uUROoB
  • Hernández-Prados, M. Á., García-Sanz, M. P., Parra, J., y Gomariz, M. Á. (2018). Participación familiar en los centros de educación secundaria. Anales de Psicología, 35(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.35.1.325981
  • Holton, E. F., Bates, R. A., y Ruona, W. E. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human resource development quarterly, 11(4), 333-360. https:// doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200024)11:4%3C333::aid-hrdq2%3E3.0.co;2-p
  • Jain, G., Sharma, N., y Shrivastava, A. (2020). Enhancing training effectiveness for organizations through blockchain-enabled training effectiveness measurement (BETEM). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(2), 439-461. https://doi. org/10.1108/jocm-10-2020-0303
  • Kodwani, A. D. (2017). Decoding Training Effectiveness: The Role of Organizational Factors. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(3), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-05- 2016-0038
  • Kodwani, A. D., y Prashar, S. (2019). Exploring the influence of pre-training factors on training effectiveness-moderating role of trainees’ reaction: a study in the public sector in India. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 283-304. https://doi. org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1596012
  • Ley 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. (2006). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 106, sec. I, de 4 de mayo de 2006, 17158-17207. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2006/05/03/2
  • Macia, M. (2019). Principales canales para la comunicación familia-escuela: análisis de necesidades y propuestas de mejora. Revista Complutense de Educación, 30(1), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.56034
  • Manna, A., y Biswas, D. (2018). Influencing factors in the training effectiveness. International Journal of Management Studies, 4(9), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v5i4(9)/15
  • Martins, L. B., Zerbini, T., y Medina, F. J. (2019). Impact of Online Training on Behavioral Transfer and Job Performance in a Large Organization. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 35(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a4
  • Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (3 de marzo, 2021). Estadística de gasto público en educación. Series temporales [Fichero de datos]. Disponible en http://estadisticas.mecd.gob.es/EducaJaxiPx/Tabla.htm?path=/economicas/gasto/ series-2019-dp//l0/&file=gasto04.px&type=pcaxis&L=0
  • Na-Nan, K., Chaiprasit, K. y Pukkeeree, P. (2017). Influences of workplace environment factors on employees’ training transfer. Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(6), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-02-2017-0010
  • Orden 6771/2018, de 30 de octubre, de la Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deportes, por la que se aprueba el Plan Trienal de Formación Permanente del Profesorado 2018-2021. (2018). Boletín Oficial de la Región de Murcia (BORM), 260, de 10 de noviembre de 2018, 28402-28436. https://www.borm.es/services/anuncio/ano/2018/ numero/6771/pdf?id=771911
  • Pamies-Berenguer, M., Cascales-Martínez, A., y Gomariz-Vicente, M. Á. (2020a). La validación de expertos en el proceso de adaptación de cuestionarios. El cuestionario de transferencia de la formación del profesorado no universitario. En: Roig-Vila, Rosabel (Ed.), La docencia en la Enseñanza Superior. Nuevas aportaciones desde la investigación e innovación educativas. (pp. 1410-1420). Octaedro.
  • Pamies-Berenguer, M., Cascales-Martínez, A., y Gomariz-Vicente, M. Á. (2020b). Cuestionario de transferencia de la formación permanente del profesorado no universitario de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. Editum. Recuperado en: http://hdl. handle.net/10201/93281
  • Pamies-Berenguer, M., Gomariz-Vicente, M.A. y Cascales-Martínez, A. (2022). Factores condicionantes de la transferencia de la formación permanente del profesorado no universitario. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 22(69). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.486801
  • Park, S., Kang, H.-S. y Kim, E.-J. (2018). The role of supervisor support on employees’ training and job performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(1/2), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2017-0054
  • Sayadi, Y., Rajaeepour, S., Abedini, Y., y Gholami, K. (2017). An examination of factors affecting transfer of training among human resources of Iranian medical science universities. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 10(17), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17485/ ijst/2017/v10i18/100040
  • Tonhäuser, C., y Büker, L. (2016). Determinants of transfer of training: A comprehensive literature review. International journal for research in vocational education and training, 3(2), 127-165. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.3.2.4
  • Vandergoot, S., Sarris, A., y Kirby, N. (2019). Factors that Influence the Transfer Generalization and Maintenance of Managerial-Leadership Skills: A Retrospective Study. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 32(3), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21297