Regional identity in a geopolitically contested area: Preševo Valley (South Serbia) scientific argumentation and political use

  1. Arsim Ejupi 1
  2. Miguel Borja Bernabé-Crespo 2
  1. 1 University of Prishtina
  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Revista:
Investigaciones Geográficas (España)

ISSN: 0213-4691,  1989-9890

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 77

Páginas: 323-337

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14198/INGEO.19877 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Investigaciones Geográficas (España)

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper discusses the theoretical and methodological principles in the process of regionalization and analyzes the criteria used during the designation of the region as a category of special importance in geographical research. Methodological principles of regionalization were applied during the differentiation of the Preševo Valley as an individualized region. The Preševo Valley is a small region in South Serbia with a very favorable geographical position because it is located in the central part of the Balkan Peninsula between the Morava and Vardar valleys. Theoretical and methodological discussion highlights elements of a geographical and socio-economic basis that contribute to a regional-geographical differentiation of the area, as well as those elements that appear as an obstacle in attempts to differentiate this area in regional terms. A critical overview of the use of the name ‘Preševo Valley’ between scientific argumentation and political usage is also given. A survey was carried out to identify the main elements that constitute Preševo Valley’s regional identity. The main results show that this region is characterized by a mostly Albanian population, poor economic development, high migration rates, strategic position, and a strong national consciousness.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bernabé-Crespo, M. B. (2020). Fronteras ocultas en la zona gris europea. Geopolítica(s), Revista de Estudios sobre Espacio y Poder, 11(2), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.5209/geop.64580
  • Bernabé-Crespo, M. B. (2021). La partición de Kosovo: ¿redibujar fronteras para conseguir la paz? Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.668
  • Bernabé-Crespo, M. B., & Peña-Ramos, J. A. (2019). The management of water resources in a disputed border. The case of Gazivoda reservoir (Kosovo). Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 8(1), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2019v8i1.p319-340
  • Contel, F. B. (2015). Concepts of region and regionalization: Aspects of its evolution and possible uses to health regionalization. Sauce Soc., 24(2), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902015000200005
  • Ejupi, A., & Ramadani, I. (2016). Regional differentiation and the geopolitical and transboundary position of the Presheva Valley. Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, 20(4), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2016-0024
  • Finlay, A. (2011). Governing ethnic conflict. Consociation, identity and the price of peace. Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847312
  • Fuerst-Bjeliš, B. (2007). Principles and methods of geographical regionalization. Zagreb.
  • García, J. (2006). Geografía regional. En D. Hiernaux-Nicolas y A. Lindón (Coords.), Tratado de geografía humana (pp. 25-70). Anthropos.
  • Giménez, G. (2005). Territorio e identidad. Breve introducción a la geografía cultural. Trayectorias, 7(17), 8-24. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/607/60722197004.pdf
  • Horowitz, D. L. (1993). The Challenge of Ethnic Conflict: Democracy in divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 4(4), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1993.0054
  • Irić, R. (2012). Geografija u političkom kazanu. Vranjske Novine.
  • Islami., H. (1981). Popullsia e Kosovës – studime demografik. Prishtina: ETMM te Kosoves.
  • Islami, H. & Ejupi, A. (2015). Albanian population and settlements of Presheva Valley- present situation and trends. Prishtina: Kosovar Academy of Sciences and Arts.
  • Kostić, M. (1969). Presevo Plain. Vranje Bulletin, 5, 144-147.
  • Kulczyk, S. (2000). The nature of boundaries of geocomplexes and the landscape types: the example of the surroundings of Pinczow in Southern Poland. Miscellanea Geographica, 9(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2000-090102
  • Marcu, S. (2011). Pax Russica: ambigüedad geopolítica de las tensiones y conflictos en el espacio de la antigua Unión Soviética. Investigaciones Geográficas, (55), 91-111. https://doi.org/10.14198/INGEO2011.55.06
  • Marković, J. (1980). Regionalna geografija SFR Jugoslavije. Belgrade: Građevinska Knjiga.
  • Murphy, A. B. (1990). Historical justifications for territorial claims. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(4), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00316.x
  • Nir, D. (1990). Region as a Socio-environmental System. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0483-5
  • Nogué, J. (1989). Espacio, lugar, región: hacia una nueva perspectiva geográfica regional. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 9, 49-62. Retrieved from http://age.ieg.csic.es/hispengeo/documentos/nogueespacio.pdf
  • Nogué, J. (2007). Paisaje, identidad y globalización. Fabrikart: arte, tecnología, industria, sociedad, 7, 136-145. Retrieved from https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/Fabrikart/article/view/2227/1843
  • Official Gazzete of the Republic of Serbia (Službeni list Republike Srbije) (2004). number 63/04. Belgrade.
  • Paasi, A. (2010). Regions are social constructs, but who or what ‘constructs’ them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning, 42, 2296-2301. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42232
  • Paasi, A. (2012). Regional identities. In M. Juergensmeyer & H. Anheimer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Studies (pp. 1-12). London: Sage.
  • Paasi, A., Harrison, J., & Jones, M. (Eds.) (2018). Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365805
  • Pavlović, M., & Šabić, D. (2006). Regionalni pristup i tipovi regionalne diferenciacije teritorije. Bulletin of papers (Geografski Institut “Jovan Cvijić”, SANU), 54, 204-218.
  • Plaza, J. I. (2001). ¿Una nueva geografía regional de España?: Algunas propuestas para su estudio. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 32, 73-93. Retrieved from https://bage.age-geografia.es/ojs/index.php/bage/article/view/403
  • Petrović, R. (1957). O problemu geografske rajonizacije Jugoslavije. Sarajevo: Geografski pregled.
  • Radovanović, M. (1994). Regionalizam kao pristup i regionalizacija kao postupak u funkcionalnoj organizaciji prostora sa nekim aspektima primene na Republiku Srbiju. Zbornik radova, 44-45, GIJC, SANU, Beograd, p.74.
  • Rašević, M, Mulina, T, Macura, M. (1976). Determinante ekonomske aktivnosti stanovnistva Jugoslavije. Belgrade: Ekonomsko Institut.
  • Rogić, V. (1963). Geografski koncept regije. Hrvatski Geografski Glasnik, 25(1).
  • Šabić, D., & Pavlović, M. (2007). Regionalna svest i regionalni identitet. Zbornik Radova, 55, 151-158.
  • Sentić, M., Rančić, M., & Đošić, D. (1971). Ocena nekih definicija i klasifikacija u popisu stanoništva 1971. godine. Belgrade: CDI, IDN.
  • Tošić, D. (2012). Principi regionalizacije. Belgrade: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Geografski Fakultet.
  • Trifunoski, J. (1951). Kumanovsko-Preševska Crna Gora. Knjiga 33. Belgrade: SANU.
  • Viales, R. J. (2010). La región como construcción social, espacial, política, histórica y subjetiva. Hacia un modelo conceptual/relacional de historia regional en América Latina. Geopolítica(s) Revista de Estudios sobre Espacio y Poder, 1(1), 157-172. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/GEOP1010120157A
  • Vojković, G. (2003). Stanovništvo kao element regionalizacije Srbije. Stanovništvo, 1-4, 7-42
  • Vujadinović, S., & Šabić, D. (2017). The importance of regions in geographical research. Collection of Papers, 65(1a), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrgfub1765195V
  • Zejnullahi, V. (2015). Albanians in Presevo Valley and their national rights. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 89-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v2i1.p90-99
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet