“Nunca lo lograrás, eres demasiado guapa”Voces de mujeres investigadoras en comunicación

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acker, Sandra (1980). Women, the other academics. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569800010106
• Acker, Sandra y Dillabough, Jo-Anne (2007). Women ‘learning to labour’ in the ‘male emporium’: exploring gendered work in teacher education. Gender and Education, 19(3), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250701295460
• Alcoff, Linda (2008). How is epistemology political? En Alison Bailey y Chris Cuomo (Eds.), The feminist philosophy reader, pp. 705-718. McGraw Hill.
• Anderson, Elizabeth (1995). The democratic university. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(2), 186-219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004726
• Armenti, Carmen (2004). May babies and posttenure babies: Maternal decisions of women professors. The Review of Higher Education 27(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2003.0046
• Ashcraft, Karen Lee y Simonson, Peter (2015). Gender, work, and the history of communication research. En Peter Simonson y Dave Park (Eds.), The international history of communication study (pp. 47-68). Routledge.
• Bagilhole, Barbara y Woodward, Hazel (1995). An Occupational Hazard Warning: academic life can seriously damage your health. An investigation of sexual harassment of women academics in a UK university. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(1), 37–51. http://doi.org/10.1080/0142569950160103
• Bourdieu, Pierre (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
• Caldwell-Colbert, A-Toy y Albino, Judith (2007). Women as academic leaders: Living the experience from two perspectives. En Jean Lau Chin, Bernice Lott, Joy Rice y Janis Sanchez-Hucles (Eds.), Women and leadership: Transforming visions and diverse voices (pp. 69-87). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470692332.ch3.
• Cantalupo, Nancy y Kidder, William (2018). A systematic look at a serial problem: Sexual harassment of students by university faculty. Utah Law Review, 2018(3), 671-786. https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2018/iss3/4
• Chakravartty, Paula, Kuo, Rachel, Grubbs, Victoria y McIlwain, Charlton (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
• Diezmann, Carmel y Grieshaber, Susan (2019). Women professors. Who makes it and how? Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3685-0
• Dorsten, Aimee Marie (2012). “Thinking dirty”: Digging up three founding “matriarchs” of communication studies. Communication Theory, 22(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01398.x
• Dorsten, Aimee Marie (2016). Women in communication research. En Klaus Bruhn Jensen y Robert Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1-13). Wiley & Sons.
• Eagly, Alice y Karau, Steven (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
• Fitzgerald, Louise, Shullman, Sandra, Bailey, Nancy, Richards, Margaret, Swecker, Jnice, Gold, Yael, Ormerod, Mimi y Weitzman, Lauren (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 32(2), 152-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(88)90012-7
• Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic injustice. Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
• García-Jiménez, Leonarda (2021). Aportaciones femeninas a las teorías de la comunicación: una propuesta para la docencia y la ciencia. Anàlisi, 65, 121-135. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3327
• García-Jiménez, Leonarda y Herrero, Esperanza (2022). Including female voices in the stories we tell about communication research: Memories and narratives of women in academia. Communication Theory, 32(2), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac002
• Goyanes, Manuel (2020). Editorial. Meta-investigación en comunicación: Antecedentes, efectos y retos de una investigación y gobernanza estandarizada. Profesional De La Información, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.06
• Gramsci, Antonio (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. International Publications.
• Hall, Stuart (2001). Encoding/decoding. En Meenakshi Durham y Douglas Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 163-174). Blackwell.
• Haraway, Donna (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
• Harding, Sandra (1986). The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press.
• Harding, Sandra (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
• Harding, Sandra (1996). Science is ‘good to think with’. Social Text, 46/47, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/466841
• Harford, Judith (2018). The perspectives of women professors on the professoriate: A missing piece in the narrative on gender equality in the university. Education Sciences, 8(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020050
• Jansen, Sue Curry (1993). “The future is not what it used to be”: Gender, history and communication studies. Communication Theory, 3(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00063.x
• Klaus, Elizabeth y Seethaler, Josef (2016). What do we really know about Herta Herzog? Peter Lang.
• Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia, Glynn, Carroll y Huge, Michael (2013). The Matilda Effect in science communication: An experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication, 35(5), 603-625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012472684
• Lloyd, Genevieve (1979). The man of reason. Metaphilosophy, 10(1), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1979.tb00062.x
• Luong, Kate, Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia y Niewiesk, Stefan (2020). Superstars within reach: The role of perceived attainability and role congruity in media role models on women’s social comparisons. Communication Monographs, 87(1), 4-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1622143
• Malterud, Kirsti, Siersma, Volkert y Guassora, Ann (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
• Mullangi, Samyukta y Jagsi, Reshma (2019). Imposter syndrome: Treat the cause, not the symptom. JAMA, 322(5), 403–404. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9788
• Park, Dave y Pooley, Jefferson (2008). The history of media and communication research: Contested memories. Peter Lang.
• Pingleton, Susan, Jones, Emily, Rosolowski, Tacey y Zimmerman, Mary (2016). Silent bias: Challenges, obstacles, and strategies for leadership development in academic medicine. Lessons from oral histories of women professors at the University of Kansas. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1151-1157. https://doi.org.10.1097/ACM.0000000000001125
• Pooley, Jefferson (2017). Wilbur Schramm and the “four founders” history of U.S. communication research. Коммуникации Медиа Дизайн, 2(4), 5-18. http://doi.org/10.17613/M6Q859
• Putnam, Linda, Phillips, Nelson y Chapman, Pamela (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. En Stewart Clegg, Cynthia Hardy y Walter Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (p. 375–408). Sage Publications.
• Rakow, Lana (2008). Feminist historiography and the field: Writing new stories. En Dave Park y Jefferson Pooley (Eds.), The history of media and communication research. Contested memories (pp. 113-142). Peter Lang.
• Repiso, Rafael, Berlanga, Inmaculada, Said-Hung, Elías y Castillo-Esparcia, Antonio (2020). Titularidad y cátedras en Comunicación en España (2000-2019). Distribución, ritmos de promoción, transferencia entre universidades y endogamia. Profesional de la Información, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.22
• Rodríguez, Clemencia, Magallanes, Claudia, Marroquín, Amparo y Rincón, Omar (2021). Mujeres de la comunicación. FES Comunicación.
• Rossiter, Margaret (1993). The Matthew/Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325-341. https://www.jstor.org/stable/285482
• Rothstein, Mitchell y Davey, Liane (1995). Gender differences in network relationships in academia. Women in Management Review, 10, 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429510095999
• Rowland, Allison y Simonson, Peter (2014). The founding mothers of communication research. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2013.849355
• Signorielli, Nancy (1996). Women in communication: a biographical sourcebook. Greenwood Press.
• Simon, Rita, Clark, Shirley y Tifft, Larry (1966). Of nepotism, marriage, and the pursuit of an academic career. Sociology of Education, 39(4), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111918
• Simonson, Peter y Archer, Lauren (2011). Women in media research. http://www.outofthequestion.org/Women-in-Media-Research.aspx
• Smooth, Wendy (2016). Intersectionality and women’s advancement in the discipline and across academy. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(3), 513-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1170706
• Tannen, Deborah (1995). The power of talk: Who gets heard and why. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 128-148. https://hbr.org/1995/09/the-power-of-talk-who-gets-heard-and-why
• Tuana, Nancy (2017). Feminist epistemology. The subject of knowledge. In Ian Kidd, José Medina y Gaile Pohlhaus (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 125-138). Routledge.
• Thompson, John (1998). Los media y la modernidad. Paidós.
• UNESCO (2020). Promise of gender equality. Key actions 2018-19. París: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372716
• Vera Balanza, Teresa (2012). Periféricas: una propuesta didáctica para Teorías de la Comunicación. Zer, 32, 13-27. https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/Zer/article/view/6550/5980
• Wright, Hazel, Cooper, Linda y Loof, Paulette (2016). Women’s ways of working: Circumventing the masculine structures operating within and upon the University. Women’s Studies International Forum, 61, 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.11.006