Current-account breaks and stability spells in a global perspective

  1. Alfonso Camba Crespo 1
  2. José García Solanes 2
  3. Fernando Torrejón Flores 2
  1. 1 UNED, Madrid
  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Journal:
Applied economic analysis

ISSN: 2632-7627

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 30

Issue: 88

Pages: 1-17

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Applied economic analysis

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to identify structural breaks in the current account and the periods between these breaks, which the authors name stability spells, and study their characteristics and determinants. Design/methodology/approach – Using data from the IMF and the World Bank, this study applies the Lee and Strazicich test to endogenously identify breaks and the Heckman selection model to simultaneously study the determinants of structural breaks and current-account changes after breaks. Findings – This study identifies 212 significant structural breaks and 341 stability spells. These spells become shorter and more volatile the further they are from equilibrium, and half of them last 10 years or less. The results show that economic growth and foreign-exchange piling are particularly useful to prevent breaks, while lower per capita income increases exposure to break risks. Originality/value – This study introduces the concept of current-account stability spells to refer to the periods between structural breaks. These spells are then studied to determine their main characteristics. The authors also apply a global perspective in their analysis, using a wide sample of 181 economies between 1980 and 2018 and considering positive and negative breaks in both level and trend.

Bibliographic References

  • Adalet, M. and Eichengreen, B. (2007), “Current account reversals: always a problem?”, in Clarida, R. (Ed.), G7 Current account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 205-242.
  • Aßmann, C. and Boysen-Hogrefe, J. (2010), “Analysis of current account reversals via regime switching models”, Economic Change and Restructuring, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 21-43.
  • Bagnai, A. and Manzocchi, S. (1999), ” “Current-account reversals in developing countries: the role of fundamentals”,Open Economies Review, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 143-163.
  • Berg, A., Ostry, J.D. and Zettelmeyer, J. (2012), “What makes growth sustained?”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 98 No. 2, pp. 149-166.
  • Bouis, R. and Duval, R. (2011), “Raising potential growth after the crisis: a quantitative assessment of the potential gains from various structural reforms in the OECD area and Beyond”, OECD Working Papers, No.835, 18 January, Paris.
  • Campbell, J.Y. and Perron, P. (1991), “Pitfalls and opportunities: what macroeconomists should know about unit roots”,NBERMacroeconomics Annual, Vol. 6, pp. 141-201.
  • Catão, L.A. and Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (2014), “External liabilities and crises”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 18-32.
  • Cubeddu, M.L.M., Krogstrup, S., Adler, G., Rabanal, M.P., Dao, M.C., Hannan, S.A., Juvenal, L., Li, N., Osorio Buitron, C., Rebillard, C., García-Macia, D., Jones, C., Rodriguez, J., Chang, K.S., Gautam, D. and Wang, Z. (2019), “The external balance assessment methodology: 2018 update”, working paper wp/19/65, International Monetary Fund,Washington, DC.
  • Das, D.K. (2016), “Determinants of current account imbalance in the global economy: a dynamic panel analysis”, Journal of Economic Structures, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-24.
  • De Mello, L., Padoan, P.C. and Rousov�a, L. (2012), “Are global imbalances sustainable? Shedding further light on the causes of current account reversals”, Review of International Economics, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 489-516.
  • Edwards, S. (2004), “Thirty years of current account imbalances, current account reversals, and sudden stops”, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 1-49.
  • Flood, R.P. and Garber, P.M. (1984), “Collapsing exchange-rate regimes: some linear examples”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 17 No. 1-2, pp. 1-13.
  • Freund, C. (2005), “Current account adjustment in industrial countries”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 1278-1298.
  • García-Solanes, J., Torrejón-Flores, F. and Ruíz-Sánchez, C. (2018), “La reversión de las cuentas Corrientes en los países periféricos de la Zona euro”, Revista de Economía Mundial, Vol. 49 No. 49, pp. 57-78.
  • Heckman, J. (1976), “The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models”, The Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 5, pp. 475-492.
  • Heckman, J.J. (1979), “Sample selection bias as a specification error”,Econometrica, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 153-161.
  • Krugman, P. (1979), “A model of balance-of-payments crises”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 311-325.
  • Lane, P.R. and Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (2012), “External adjustment and the global crisis”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 252-265.
  • Lee, J. and Strazicich, M.C. (2003), “Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 85 No. 4, pp. 1082-1089.
  • Liesenfeld, R., Moura, G.V. and Richard, J.F. (2007), “Dynamic panel probit models for current account reversals and their efficient estimation”, Economics working paper 2007–11, 18 May, Department of Economics, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel.
  • Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. and Razin, A. (1998), “Sharp reductions in current account deficits an empirical analysis”, European Economic Review, Vol. 42 No. 3-5, pp. 897-908.
  • Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. and Razin, A. (2000), “Current account reversals and currency crises: empirical regularities”, Currency Crises, University of Chicago Press. pp. 285-323.
  • Ng, S. and Perron, P. (1995), “Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 90 No. 429, pp. 268-281.
  • Obstfeld, M. (1994), “The logic of currency crises”, Cahiers Economiques et Monitaires (Bank of France), Vol. 43, pp. 189-213.
  • Perron, P. (1989), “The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis”, Econometrica, Vol. 57 No. 6, pp. 1361-1401.
  • Xifré, R. (2020), “The political value of internal devaluation in the euro area crisis”, Global Policy, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 466-477.
  • Zivot, E. and Andrews, D.W.K. (1992), “Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 10, pp. 251-270.
Data source: Dialnet