E-Commerce C2C en Chileincorporación de la reputación y de la confianza en el TAM

  1. Renato Sukno 1
  2. María Isabel Pascual del Riquelme 2
  1. 1 Universidad Católica del Norte Chile
  2. 2 Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
    info

    Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

    Elche, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01azzms13

Revista:
Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

ISSN: 0718-2724

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 14

Número: 3

Páginas: 72-81

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242019000300072 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

Resumen

El comercio electrónico en Chile ha ido creciendo de manera considerable en el último tiempo. Sin embargo, aún está lejos de alcanzar su potencial. Dadas las ventajas que el comercio electrónico ofrece para mejorar la competitividad de las pequeñas y medianas empresas globalmente, resulta vital mejorar el conocimiento de aquellos factores que pueden incrementar su uso. En la presente investigación se emplea el Modelo de Aceptación de la Tecnología (TAM) como base para analizar el comercio electrónico Consumidor-a-Consumidor (C2C) en Chile, una de las formas de compra online más importantes de ese país. Como antecedentes adicionales, se incluyeron la reputación de la plataforma web como la confianza del consumidor. Datos de 468 compradores chilenos reales proporcionaron importantes resultados acerca de los factores explicativos del uso de estas plataformas en Chile, así como también de las relaciones entre las variables estudiadas. Con esto, hemos proporcionado importantes contribuciones teóricas y prácticas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ashraf, A. R., Thongpapanl, N. T., & Spyropoulou, S. (2016). The connection and disconnection between e-commerce businesses and their customers: Exploring the role of engagement, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease-of-use. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 20, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.10.001
  • Ballesteros Díaz, B., Tavera Mesías, J. F., & Castaño Serna, D. (2014). Aceptación tecnológica de la publicidad en dispositivos móviles en Colombia. Semestre Económico, 17(36). https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v17n36a6
  • Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2012). Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 15(4), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004
  • Ben Mansour, K.(2016). An analysis of business’ acceptance of internet banking: an integration of e-trust to the TAM. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(8), 982-994. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-10-2016-271
  • Benamati J, Fuller, M. A., Serva, M. A., & Baroudi, J. (2010). Clarifying the integration of trust and TAM in e-commerce environments: implications for systems design and management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 380-393. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2009.2023111
  • Biswas, D., & Biswas, A. (2004). The diagnostic role of signals in the context of perceived risks in online shopping: do signals matter more on the web?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 30-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20010
  • Brashear, T. G., Kashyap, V., Musante, M. D., & Donthu, D. (2009). A profile of the Internet shopper: Evidence from six countries. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.2753/mtp1069-6679170305
  • Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152092
  • Chang, S. E., Shen, W. C., & Yeh, C. H. (2017). A comparative study of user intention to recommend content on mobile social networks. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(4), 5399-5417.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3966-1
  • Chen, J. V., Su, B. C., & Widjaja, A. E. (2016). Facebook C2C social commerce: A study of online impulse buying. Decision Support Systems, 83, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.12.008
  • CNC (2019), Informe de ventas online – Segundo semestre 2018, Cámara de Chile, disponible en: https://www.cnc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Informe-Ventas-Online-Segundo-Semestre-2018.pdf (último acceso 14/03/2019)
  • CNC (2018), Informe de ventas online – Segundo semestre 2017, Cámara de Chile, disponible en: https://www.cnc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Informe-Ventas-Online-Segundo-Semestre-2017.pdf (último acceso 14/03/2019)
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • De Obesso Grijalvo, A. M., Gutiérrez, S. S. M., & Torres, N. H. J. (2012). Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 18(3), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2012.05.006
  • Doney, Patricia M. and Joseph P. Cannon (1997), “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (2), 35-51.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100203
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief. Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 6.
  • Garbarino, E., & Lee, O. F. (2003). Dynamic pricing in internet retail: effects on consumer trust. Psychology & Marketing, 20(6), 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10084
  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  • He, D., Lu, Y., & Zhou, D. (2008). Empirical study of consumers' purchase intentions in C2C electronic commerce. Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13(3), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1007-0214(08)70046-4
  • Jamshidi, D., & Hussin, N. (2016). Forecasting patronage factors of Islamic credit card as a new e-commerce banking service: An integration of TAM with perceived religiosity and trust. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 7(4), 378-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-07-2014-0050
  • Joo, J. (2015). Roles of the Buyer’s Trust in Seller in Posted-Price Model of Consumer to Consumer E-Commerce. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 10(3), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-18762015000300004
  • Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information systems research, 13(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
  • Lu, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, B. (2010). From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(4), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003
  • Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., & Halberstadt, A. (2002, January). A computational model of trust and reputation. In System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 2431-2439). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2002.994181
  • Netrica (2018), Primer ranking de e-commerce revela quiénes lideran el negocio en Chile, Netrica by Netquest, disponible en: https://www.netrica.com/2017/10/16/primer-ranking-e-commerce-revela-quienes-lideran-negocio-chile/ (último acceso: 14/03/2019)
  • Palvia, P. (2009). The role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: A unified model. Information & management, 46(4), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.02.003
  • Paredes, E. y Velasco, M.E. (2007). Comercio electrónico. McGraw-Hill/Interamericana de España, SAU.
  • Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
  • Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-04-2012-0011
  • Riquelme, I. P., & Román, S. (2014). The influence of consumers’ cognitive and psychographic traits on perceived deception: A comparison between online and offline retailing contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1628-z
  • Riquelme, I. P., Román, S., & Iacobucci, D. (2016). Consumers' perceptions of online and offline retailer deception: a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 35, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.01.002
  • San Martín Gutiérrez, S., & Camarero Izquierdo, C. (2010). Los determinantes de la confianza del comprador online. Comparación con el caso de subasta. Cuadernos de gestión, 10. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.100187ss
  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
  • Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & management, 44(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
  • Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2012). Consumer acceptance of service bundles: An empirical investigation in the context of broadband triple play. Information & Management, 49(2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.12.003
  • Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000). Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 28(1), 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281014
  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007). Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 35(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/t68604-000
  • Wang, Y., & Vassileva, J. (2003, September). Trust and reputation model in peer-to-peer networks. In Peer-to-Peer Computing, 2003.(P2P 2003). Proceedings. Third International Conference on (pp. 150-157). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ptp.2003.1231515
  • Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
  • Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733
  • Xiang, L., Zheng, X., Lee, M. K., & Zhao, D. (2016). Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction. International journal of information management, 36(3), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.002
  • Xiong, L., & Liu, L. (2003, June). A reputation-based trust model for peer-to-peer e-commerce communities. In E-Commerce, 2003. CEC 2003. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 275-284). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/coec.2003.1210262
  • Ye, L. R., & Zhang, H. H. (2014). Sales promotion and purchasing intention: Applying the technology acceptance model in consumer-to-consumer marketplaces. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 4(3), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229669.n797
  • Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., & Rho, J. (2005). Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Information & management, 42(7), 965-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.11.001
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet