Canalización intraósea con los dispositivos BIG y EZ-IO. Revisión sistemática
- Itxaso Goñi Bilbao
- Lorena Sánchez Solana 1
- Celia Ferrando Martínez
- Miriam Infante Garza
- José Luis Díaz Agea
- César Leal Costa
- 1 Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet. Zaragoza, España
ISSN: 1697-638X
Year of publication: 2018
Volume: 15
Issue: 15
Type: Article
More publications in: Evidentia: Revista de enfermería basada en la evidencia
Abstract
Introduction: The importance of vascular access in critically ill patients, beside the difficulty of channeling a peripheral venous route, creates the necessity for faster and safer alternatives; the intraosseous route is the most indicated. It allows administer fluids and drugs, and draw bone marrow samples. Objective: To compare the use of BIG and EZ-IO introsseous devices. Methodology: To make this systematic review, it has been made a searching in several databases, using the search strategy [“Bone Injection Gun” OR “EZ-IO” OR (“intraosseous access” and device)]. Articles published in last five years, available articles in English and Spanish, and with access to full text, were included. Results and conclusions: Convincing scientific evidence doesn’t exist to assert the BIG device superiority against EZ-IO, neither EZ-IO higher over BIG. The analyzed results reassert the intraosseous route like fast and secure alternative to access to vascular torrent in critically ill patients.