Experiencias de partos en casa y en el hospital de mujeres en los años 60 y 70 en España

  1. Celia Driéguez Castaño 1
  2. Esther María López Martínez 1
  3. Zaraida Avilés Sáez 1
  4. María Belén Conesa Ferrer 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Journal:
Cultura de los cuidados: Revista de Enfermería y Humanidades

ISSN: 1699-6003

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 52

Pages: 77-91

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/CUID.2018.52.07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

More publications in: Cultura de los cuidados: Revista de Enfermería y Humanidades

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to describe the experience of women who lived their births in hospitals and at home in Spain between 60’s and 70’s years. For women, childbirth is one of the most special moments of their lives, hence the importance of knowing the feelings experienced in this process, which will help us to improve this care on future occasions and know what women really value when giving birth. This study also reflected that home births, provided they are low risk and serviced by qualified personnel, are safe and we should be left to the woman who, with all the information, decide always where she want to give birth. This is a qualitative research based on Grounded Theory.

Bibliographic References

  • Amundsen, H.H., Aune, I. & Skaget, L.C. (2014). Is a midwife’s continuous presense during childbirth a matter of course? Midwive’s experiences and thoughts about factors that may influence their continuous support of women during labour. Midwifery. 30(1), 89-95. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.001
  • Arantzamendi, M., Gordo, C., López-Dicastillo, O. & Vivar C.G. (2010). La Teoría Fundamentada como Metodología de Investigación Cualitativa en Enfermería. Index de Enfermería, 19(4).
  • Ariza, N.E., Lizarazo, J.P. & Ospina, J.M. (2012). Programa madre canguro: una alternativa sencilla y costo eficaz para la protección de los recién nacidos prematuros o con bajo peso al nacer. Revista salud pública, 14(2), 32-45.
  • Arnau, J. (2012). Estudio Exploratorio de la Humanización en la Atención Perinatal de la Mujer del Área I de Salud de la Región de Murcia (Tesis doctoral). Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
  • Barbosa, F.M., Fernández, E., Junqueira, S.M. & Mota, L. (2011). Prácticas para estimular el parto normal. Index de Enfermería, 20(3). Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.4321/S1132-12962011000200007
  • Behruzi, R., Fraser, W., Goulet, L. & Hatem, M. (2011). The facilitating factors and barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanized birth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliated hospital. BMC Women’s Health, 11(1), 53. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-53
  • Bravo, P. et al. (2004). Bienestar materno durante el proceso de parto: Desarrollo y aplicación de una escala de medición. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 73(1), 4-10.
  • Buitendijk, S.E. et al. (2015). Perinatal mortality and morbidity ut to 28 days after birth among 743.070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122(5), 720-728. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13084
  • Carmo, M., Moreira E & Soares, R.M. (2004). Aspects of women’s satisfaction with childbirth care in a maternity hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 20, 52-62.
  • Carroli, G. & Mignini, L. (2012). Episiotomía para el parto vaginal. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11.
  • Creedy, D.K., Gamble J. & Teakle, B. (2007). Women’s expectations of maternity services: a community-based survey. Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 20(3), 115-20. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2007.05.003
  • De Miguel, J.R. & Odriozola J.M. (2010). El parto de evolución lenta: conducta obstétrica en partos de bajo riesgo. Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.
  • Federación de Asociaciones de Matronas de España (2007). Iniciativa Parto Normal. Documento de Consenso. Barcelona: FADE.
  • Gates, S., Hodnett, E.D., Hofmeyr, G.J., Sakala, C. & Weston, J. (2013). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 15, 2.
  • Goodman, P., Mackey, M.C. & Tavakoli, A.S. (2004). Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2), 212-219. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02981.x
  • Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre Atención al Parto Normal. (2010). Guías de Práctica Clínica en el SNS: OSTEBA.
  • Hodnett, E. (2002). Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 186(5), 160-172. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70189-0
  • Janssen, P.A. et al. (2009). Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 181(6-7), 377-383. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081869
  • Mas-Pons, R. et al. (2010). Satisfacción de las mujeres con la experiencia del parto: validación de la Mackey Satisfaction Childbirth Rating Scale. Gac Sanit, 26(3), 236-242. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.019
  • National Collaborating Centre for Women´s and Children´s Health. (2014). Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Clinical Guideline.
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud. (1996). Cuidados en el parto normal: una guía práctica. Ginebra: OMS.
  • Sercekus, P. & Okumus, H. (2009). Fears associated with childbirth among nulliparous women in Turkey. Midwifery, 25(2), 155-62. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.02.005
Data source: Dialnet