Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice

  1. Caterina Calderon 1
  2. Paula Jiménez-Fonseca 2
  3. Pere Joan Ferrando 3
  4. Carlos Jara 4
  5. Urbano Lorenzo-Seva 3
  6. Carmen Beato 5
  7. Teresa García-García 6
  8. Beatriz Castelo 7
  9. Avinash Ramchandani 8
  10. María Mar Muñoz 9
  11. Eva Martínez de Castro 10
  12. Ismael Ghanem 7
  13. Montse Mangas 11
  14. Alberto Carmona-Bayonas 6
  1. 1 Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona
  2. 2 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario Central of Asturias
  3. 3 Rovira and Virgili University
  4. 4 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón
  5. 5 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Grupo Quirón, Sevilla
  6. 6 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer
  7. 7 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario La Paz
  8. 8 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria
  9. 9 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Virgen de La Luz
  10. 10 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
  11. 11 Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Galdakao -Usansolo
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 18

Número: 2

Páginas: 143-151

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2017.12.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Antecedentes/Objetivo: Este estudio analiza las propiedades psicométricas del Questionnaire Shared Decision-Making (SDM-Q-9) en pacientes con cáncer resecado, no metastásico y elegible para quimioterapia adyuvante. Métodos: Un total de 568 pacientes fueron reclutados en un estudio multi-institucional, prospectivo, transversal. Los pacientes respondieron al SDM-Q-9 después de visitar a su oncólogo que, a su vez, completó el SDM-Q-versión médico. Se estudiaron la fiabilidad, la estructura factorial (análisis factorial exploratorio y análisis factorial confirmatorio) y la validez convergente de las puntuaciones del SDM-Q-9. Resultados: La escala SDM-Q-9 mostró una estructura factorial clara, compatible con un factor general fuerte y replicable y un factor de grupo secundario, en pacientes con cáncer resecado y no metastásico. La puntuación del factor general mostró una buena fiabilidad en términos de coeficiente omega: 0,90. La asociación entre la percepción del médico y del paciente en la SDM fue débil y no logró alcanzar significación estadística. Los hombres y los pacientes mayores de 60 años mostraron mayor satisfacción con la toma de decisión compartida. Conclusiones: SDM-Q-9 puede ayudar en la evaluación de la toma de decisión compartida desde la perspectiva de los pacientes de cáncer y como indicador del grado de calidad y satisfacción en el cuidado de la salud en la relación médico-paciente.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This work was funded by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) in 2015. The sponsor of this research has not participated in data collection, analysis, or interpretation, in writing the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Calderon, C., Ferrando, P. J., Carmona-Bayonas, A., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Jara, C., Beato, C., García, T., Ramchandani, A., Castelo, B., Muñoz, M. M., García, S., Higuera, O., Mangas-Izquierdo, M., & Jimenez-Fonseca, P. (2017). Validation of SDM-Q-Doc Questionnaire to measure shared decision-making physician’s perspective in oncology practice. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 19, 1312---1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1671-9
  • Carretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5, 521---551.
  • Chewning, B., Bylund, C. L., Shah, B., Arora, N. K., Gueguen, J. A., & Makoul, G. (2012). Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 86, 9---18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004
  • Coulter, A., & Collins, A. (2011). Making Shared Decision-Making a Reality. London: King’s Fund.
  • Coulter, A., Parsons, S., & Askham, J. (2008). Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care? Health Systems. Health and Wealth, 1---26. Available from: http://www.who.int/management/general/decisionmaking/ WhereArePatientsinDecisionMaking.pdf
  • De la Torre-Luque, A., Gambara, H., López, E., & Cruzado, J. A. (2016). Psychological treatments to improve quality of life in cancer contexts: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 211---219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.005
  • De las Cuevas, C., Perestelo-Perez, L., Rivero-Santana, A., Cebolla-Martí, A., Scholl, I., & Härter, M. (2015). Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared DecisionMaking Questionnaire. Health Expectations, 18, 2143---2153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12183
  • Elwyn, G., Dehlendorf, C., Epstein, R., Marrin, K., White, J., & Frosch, D. (2014). Shared decision making and motivational interveiwing: Achieving patient-centred care across the spectrum of health care problems. Annals of Family Medicine, 12, 270---275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.1615
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with item response theory,. Retrieved from http://psico.Fcep.Urv.Es/utilitats/factor
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Advance Online Publication, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
  • Jönsson, B., Hofmarcher, T., Lindgren, P., & Wilking, N. (2016). The cost and burden of cancer in the European Union 1995-2014. European Journal of Cancer, 66, 162---170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.022
  • Kriston, L., Scholl, I., Hölzel, L., Simon, D., Loh, A., & Härter, M. (2010). The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 80, 94---99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034
  • Libert, Y., Canivet, D., Ménard, C., Van Achte, L., Farvacques, C., Merckaert, I., Liénard, A., Klastersky, J., Reynaert, C., Slachmuylder, J. L., Durieux, J. F., Delvaux, N., & Razavi, D. (2017). Predictors of physicians’ communication performance in a decision-making encounter with a simulated advanced-stage cancer patient: A longitudinal study. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 1672---1679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.025
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A Comprehensive Program for Fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 497---498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1087---1110. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11005395
  • O’Connor, A. M., Bennett, C. L., Stacey, D., Barry, M., Col, N. F., Eden, K. B., Entwistle, V. A., Fiset, V., Holmes-Rovner, M., Khanqura, S., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., & Rovner, D. (2009). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD001431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2
  • Olson, D. P., & Windish, D. M. (2010). Communication discrepancies between physicians and hospitalized patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170, 1302---1307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.239
  • Ramos-Álvarez, M. M., Moreno-Fernández, M. M., Valdés-Conroy, B., & Catena, A. (2008). Criteria of the peer review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research in Psychology: A guide for creating research papers. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 751---764.
  • Rodenburg-Vandenbussche, S., Pieterse, A. H., Kroonenberg, P. M., Scholl, I., van der Weijden, T., Luyten, G. P. M., Kruitwagen, R. F., den Ouden, H., Carlier, I. V., van Vliet, I. M., Zitman, F. G., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2015). Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care. PLOS ONE, 10, e0132158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132158
  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137---150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23---74.
  • Scholl, I., Kriston, L., Dirmaier, J., Buchholz, A., & Härter, M. (2012). Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire --physician version (SDM-Q-Doc). Patient Education and Counseling, 88, 284---290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005
  • Scholl, I., Kriston, L., Dirmaier, J., & Härter, M. (2015). Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale an attempt to establish convergent validity. Health Expectations, 18, 137---150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12022
  • Schuler, M., Schildmann, J., Trautmann, F., Hentschel, L., Hornemann, B., Rentsch, A., Ehninger, G., & Schmitt, J. (2017). Cancer patients’ control preferences in decision making and associations with patient-reported outcomes: A prospective study in an outpatient cancer center. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25, 2753---2760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3686-8
  • Shay, L. A., & Lafata, J. E. (2015). Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 35, 114---131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14551638
  • Simon, D., Schorr, G., Wirtz, M., Vodermaier, A., Caspari, C., Neuner, B., Spies, C., Krnoes, T., Edwards, A., Loh, A., & Härter, M. (2006). Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 319---327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.012
  • Singh, S., Butow, P., Charles, M., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2010). Shared decision making in oncology: Assessing oncologist behaviour in consultations in which adjuvant therapy is considered after primary surgical treatment. Health Expectations, 13, 244---257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00587.x
  • Tamirisa, N. P., Goodwin, J. S., Kandalam, A., Linder, S. K., Weller, S., Turrubiate, S., Silva, C., & Riall, T. S. (2017). Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer. Health Expectations. Advance Online Publication, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12564
  • Thorne, S., Oliffe, J. L., & Stajduhar, K. I. (2016). Communicating shared decision-making: Cancer patient perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling, 90, 291---296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.018
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet