The influence of formal and informal control on market and financial results

  1. Daniel Espinosa Sáez 1
  2. Paola Andrea Ortiz Rendón 2
  3. José Luis Munuera Alemán 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia
    info

    Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia

    Medellín, Colombia

    ROR https://ror.org/0289gr697

Revista:
Spanish journal of marketing-ESIC

ISSN: 2444-9695,  2444-9709

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 26

Número: 1

Páginas: 44-60

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1108/SJME-04-2021-0072 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Spanish journal of marketing-ESIC

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Objetivo – Examinar la relacion entre los mecanismos de control y los resultados a partir de una muestra de directores de marketing. Con ese fin, el documento se centra en la relacion entre los tipos de controles utilizados en marketing y los resultados de mercado y financieros. Metodología – Los datos fueron recolectados a través de una encuesta entre profesionales del marketing con experiencia y capacidad de toma de decisiones sobre presupuestos y planes de marketing. Contando con una muestra de 97 gerentes de marketing. Los datos se analizaron mediante un modelo de ecuacion estructural (SEM) utilizando Smart PLS 3. Hallazgos – Se confirma el impacto significativo de los mecanismos de control de marketing sobre los resultados organizacionales, demostrando la relacion del control formal con los resultados de mercado, y la relacion entre el control informal con los resultados financieros. Asimismo, se pudo comprobar que existe una relacion entre el control formal e informal. Originalidad – Los resultados ayudan a explicar la relacion entre los mecanismos de control de marketing y los resultados organizacionales, y permiten comprender cual es el nivel de influencia que tienen los mecanismos de control de marketing sobre los resultados de mercado y los financieros. Implicaciones practicas – La implementacion de los mecanismos de control debe basarse en el desarrollo de un sistema de evaluacion detallado de las actividades realizadas por los empleados de marketing y un analisis de sus capacidades y habilidades. Ademas, los gerentes deben integrar las decisiones de control formal en su estrategia de marketing para mejorar los resultados organizacionales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ambler, T., Kokkinaki, F. and Puntoni, S. (2004), “Assessing marketing performance: reasons for metrics selection”, Journal of MarketingManagement, Vol. 20 Nos 3/4, pp. 475-498.
  • Anderson, E. and Oliver, R.L. (1987), “Perspectives on behavior-based versus outcome-based salesforce control systems”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 76-88.
  • Baldauf, A., Cravens, D.W. and Piercy, N.F. (2001), “Examining the consequences of sales management control strategies in European field sales organizations”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 474-508.
  • Bande, B., Kimura, T., Fern�andez-Ferrín, P. and Jaramillo, F. (2021), “Capability management control and salesperson turnover: a double-edged sword in a product complexity scenario”, Industrial MarketingManagement, Vol. 96, pp. 100-112.
  • Barwise, P. and Farley, J.U. (2004), “Marketing metrics: status of six metrics in five countries”, EuropeanManagement Journal, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 257-262.
  • Bedford, D.S. (2015), “Management control systems across different modes of innovation: implications for firm performance”,Management Accounting Research, Vol. 28, pp. 12-30.
  • Best, R. (2012),Market-BasedManagement (Sixth), Pearson Higher Ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Cacciolatti, L. and Lee, S.H. (2016), “Revisiting the relationship between marketing capabilities and firm performance: the moderating role of market orientation, marketing strategy and organisational power”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 12, pp. 5597-5610.
  • Challagalla, G.N. and Shervani, T.A. (1996), “Dimensions and types of supervisory control: effects on salesperson performance and satisfaction”, Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 89-105.
  • Clark, B.H. (1999), “Marketing performance measures: history and interrelationships”, Journal of MarketingManagement, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 711-732.
  • Clatworthy, M.A. and Peel, M.J. (2013), “The impact of voluntary audit and governance characteristics on accounting errors in private companies”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 1-25.
  • Cravens, D.W., Lassk, F.G., Low, G.S., Marshall, G.W. and Moncrief, W.C. (2004), “Formal and informal management control combinations in sales organizations. The impact on salesperson consequences”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 241-248.
  • Duh, R.R., Chow, C.W. and Chen, H. (2006), “Strategy, IT applications for planning and control and firm performance: the impact of impediments to IT implementation”, Information and Management, Vol. 43 No. 8, pp. 939-949.
  • Edeling, A. and Fischer, M. (2016), “Marketing’s impact on firm value: generalizations from a Metaanalysis”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 515-534.
  • Farley, J.U., Hoenig, S., Lehmann, D.R. and Nguyen, H.T. (2008), “Marketing metrics use in a transition economy: the case of Vietnam”, Journal of Global Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 179-190.
  • Fonseca, L., Amaral, A. and Oliveira, J. (2021), “Quality 4.0: the EFQM 2020 model and industry 4.0 relationships and implications”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 6, p. 3107.
  • Gong, M.Z. and Ferreira, A. (2014), “Does consistency in management control systems design choices influence firm performance? An empirical analysis”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 497-522.
  • Hair, J. Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (2014), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, NewYork, NY.
  • Hanssens, D.M. and Pauwels, K.H. (2016), “Demonstrating the value of marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 80 No. 6, pp. 173-190.
  • Henri, J.-F. (2006), “Organizational culture and performance measurement systems”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 77-103.
  • Homburg, C., Artz, M. and Wieseke, J. (2012), “Marketing performance measurement systems: does comprehensiveness really improve performance? ”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 56-77.
  • Jaworski, B.J. (1988), “Toward a theory of marketing control: environmental context, control types and consequences”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 23-39.
  • Jaworski, B.J., Stathakopoulos, V. and Shanker Krishnan, H. (1993), “Control combinations in marketing: conceptual framework and empirical evidence”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 57-69.
  • Katsikeas, C.S., Morgan, N.A., Leonidou, L.C. and Hult, G.T.M. (2016), “Assessing performance outcomes in marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 80 No. 2, pp. 1-20.
  • Liang, X. and Gao, Y. (2020), “Marketing performance measurement systems and firm performance: are marketing capabilities the missing links?”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 885-907.
  • Liang, X. and Frösén, J. (2020), “Examining the link between marketing controls and firm performance: the mediating effect of market-focused learning capability”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 109, pp. 545-556.
  • Malek, S.L., Sarin, S. and Jaworski, B.J. (2018), “Sales management control systems: review, synthesis and directions for future exploration”, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 30-55.
  • Malmi, T. and Brown, D.A. (2008), “Management control systems as a package — opportunities, challenges and research directions”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 287-300.
  • Marketing Science Institute (2014), 2014-2016 Research Priorities, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
  • Markovitch, D.G., Huang, D. and Ye, P. (2020), “Marketing intensity and firm performance: contrasting the insights based on actual marketing expenditure and its SG&A proxy”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 118, pp. 223-239.
  • Miao, C.F. and Evans, K.R. (2012), “Effects of formal sales control systems: a combinatory perspective”, International Journal of Research inMarketing, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 181-191.
  • Miao, C.F. and Evans, K.R. (2014), “Motivating industrial sales force with sales control systems: an interactive perspective”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67 No. 6, pp. 1233-1242.
  • Morgan, N.A. Vorhies, D.W. andMason, C.H. (2009), “Market orientation, marketing capallivan”.
  • O’Sullivan, D. and Abela, A.V. (2007), “Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 71 No. 2, pp. 79-93.
  • Ortiz-Rend�on, P., Restrepo, L.M. and Munuera-Alem�an, J. (2020), “The relationship between marketing control mechanisms and firm performance”, Proceedings of the European Marketing Academy, Vol. 48, p. 8495.
  • Pan Fagerlin, W. and Lövstål, E. (2020), “Top managers’ formal and informal control practices in product innovation processes”, Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 497-524.
  • Rust, R.T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G.S., Kumar, V. and Srivastava, R.K. (2004), “Measuring marketing productivity: current knowledge and future directions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 No. 4, pp. 76-89.
  • Statista (2020), “Annual growth rate of the investment in digital marketing in Spain between 2015 to 2019”, October 2020, available at: www.statista.com/statistics/756885/marketing-spending-inspain/
  • Thomas, H. (2007), “Business school strategy and the metrics for success”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 33-42.
  • Verhoef, P. and Leeflang, P. (2009), “Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 14-37.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet