Inovação de processos técnicos em e-books em bibliotecas universitárias no Brasilanálise de percepção dos bibliotecários

  1. Mariângela Spotti Lopes Fujita 1
  2. Isidoro Gil-Leiva 2
  3. Franciele Marques Redigolo 3
  1. 1 Universidade Estadual Paulista
    info

    Universidade Estadual Paulista

    São Paulo, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/00987cb86

  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  3. 3 Universidad Federal de Pará
    info

    Universidad Federal de Pará

    Tucuruí, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/03q9sr818

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Revista ACB: Biblioteconomia em Santa Catarina

ISSN: 1414-0594

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Agenda 2030: As biblioteca hoje e o que queremos para o amanha?

Volumen: 26

Número: 3

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista ACB: Biblioteconomia em Santa Catarina

Resumen

Os livros eletrônicos (e-books) começaram a chegar às bibliotecas de forma intensa e incessante no início dos anos 2000 e causaram efeitos disruptivos em comportamentos de uso e, em especial, em técnicas de tratamento, acesso, organização e preservação. Entretanto, existem poucas informações sobre o que está acontecendo nas bibliotecas universitárias brasileiras em relação aos processos temáticos realizados em e-books. Com o objetivo de conhecer a repercussão que a incorporação massiva de e-books nos sistemas de bibliotecas universitárias do Brasil está causando nos processos de atribuição de cabeçalhos de assuntos e códigos de classificação, bem como conhecer as percepções dos bibliotecários frente à introdução deste novo formato, foi realizada pesquisa exploratória com aplicação de questionário via e-mail aos diretores ou chefes de processos técnicos de 219 bibliotecas universitárias no Brasil. Os 24 questionários respondidos foram analisados em cinco categorias: atribuição de cabeçalhos de assuntos; atribuição de código de classificação; ferramentas de descoberta; "Frustração" ou "estresse" entre bibliotecários e mudança de paradigma; e, Automatização da atribuição de assuntos e códigos de classificação. Em comparação com resultados obtidos de questionários respondidos por bibliotecários de outros países, observou-se que existem impasses a serem solucionados para as indagações sobre processos tradicionais de atribuição de cabeçalhos de assuntos e códigos de classificação, o estresse e frustração no enfrentamento de uma provável mudança de paradigma e a possibilidade de automatização na atribuição de assuntos e códigos de classificação. Conclui-se que uma transição ainda está em andamento sem uma definição clara de políticas e normativas que guiem os bibliotecários brasileiros.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AHARONY, N.; BAR-ILAN, J. Students academic reading preferences: an exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, v. 50, p. 3-13, 2018.
  • ARDITO, S. Electronic books: to “E” or not to “E” that is the question. Searcher, v. 8, p. 28-39, 2000. Disponível em: http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/apr00/ardito.htm
  • BARDEEN, A., SPURGIN, K.; TRIUMPH, T.; WILCHER, L. Data-informed ebook discovery: an analytical approach to the user experience. Serials Review, v. 43, n. 3-4, p. 231-38, 2017.
  • BERGSTRÖM, A.; HÖGLUND, L. E-books: in the shadow of print. Convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856518808936
  • BREEDING, M. The complicated story of ebooks in libraries. Computers in Libraries, v. 37, p. 16-18, 2017.
  • BROWN, S.; CURRIE, L. Shaping an eDDA program through assessment. Technical Services Quarterly, v. 36, p. 155-76, 2019.
  • BUCZYNSKI, J.A. Bridging the gap library ebooks: some can't find them, others find them and don't know what they are. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, v. 15, p. 11-9, 2010.
  • CASTRO, J., GUAJARDO, R., RAGUCCI, M.; RANDALL, M. MARC metamorphosis: transforming the way you look at e-book records. Serials Librarian, v. 76, p. 213-19, 2019.
  • CHEN, M.; KIM, M.; MONTGOMERY, D. Ebook record management at The University of Texas at Dallas. Technical Services Quarterly, v. 33, p. 251-67, 2016.
  • CONNAWAY, L.S.; WICHT, H.L. What happened to the e-book revolution?: the gradual integration of e-books into academic libraries. Journal of Electronic Publishing, v. 10, 2017.
  • COSTELLO, L. Comparison of e-book acquisitions strategies across disciplines finds differences in cost and usage. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, v. 12, p. 109-11, 2017.
  • CROFT, R.; DAVIS, C. E-books revisited: surveying student e-book usage in a distributed learning academic library 6 years later. Journal of Library Administration, v. 50, p. 543-69, 2010.
  • CUADRADO-FERNÁNDEZ, M.I.; FE-TRILLO, M. EBiblio, servicio de préstamo de libros electrónicos en bibliotecas públicas. Profesional de la Información, v. 24, p. 176-84, 2015.
  • ENGLAND, M.M.; ANDERSON, R. R. Demand-driven acquisition of print books: applying 21st-century procurement strategies to a 5th-century format. Collection Management, v. 44, p. 95-104, 2019.
  • FREDERIKSEN, L.; CUMMINGS, J.; CUMMINGS, L.; CARROLL, D. Ebooks and interlibrary loan: Licensed to fill?. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve, v. 21, p. 117- 31, 2011.
  • FREDERICK, D.E. 2016. Managing ebook metadata in academic libraries. taming the tiger. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016.
  • GIBLIN, R., J. KENNEDY, K. WEATHERALL, D. IAN GILBERT, J. THOMAS AND F. PETITJEAN, F. Available, but not accessible? investigating publishers' e-lending licensing practices. Information Research, v. 24, n. 837, 2019.
  • GOEDEKEN, E.A.; LAWSON, K. The past, present, and future of demand-driven acquisitions in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, v. 76, p. 205-21, 2015.
  • GOODWIN, C. The e-duke scholarly collection: e-book v. print use. Collection Building, v. 33, p. 101- 105, 2014.
  • HORAVA, T. Today and in perpetuity: a canadian consortial strategy for owning and hosting ebooks. Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 39, p. 423-28, 2013.
  • JEONG, H. A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, v. 30, p. 390-408, 2012.
  • LAM, P.; LAM, S.L.; LAM, J.; MCNAUGHT, C. Usability and usefulness of ebooks on PPCs: how students' opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, v. 25, p. 30-44, 2009.
  • LEWELLEN, R.; BISCHOF, S.; PLUM, T. EBL ebook use compared to the use of equivalent print books and other eresources: a University of Massachusetts Amherst – MINES for Libraries® case study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, v. 17, p. 150-164, 2016.
  • MARTIN, K.E.; MUNDLE, K. Notes on operations cataloging e-books and vendor records: a case study at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Library Resources & Technical Services, v. 54, p. 227-37, 2010.
  • MCCLURE, M. A case of increasing the functionality and profile of ebooks. EContent, v. 30, p 61-3, 2007.
  • MACHOVEC, G. Consortial ebook archiving environmental scan. Journal of Library Administration, v. 58, p. 81-90, 2018.
  • MCGRATH, M. Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature. Interlending and Document Supply, v. 44, p. 1-6, 2016.
  • MCKAY, D.; BUCHANAN, G.; CHANG, S. It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it: design guidelines to better support online browsing. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 55, p. 347-56, 2018.
  • MILLER, L.N. Preference for print or electronic book depends on user's purpose for consulting. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, v. 9, p 95-97, 2014.
  • MÜHLBERGER, G.; GSTREIN, S. ebooks on demand (EOD): a european digitization service. IFLA Journal, v. 35, p. 35-43, 2009.
  • NOORHIDAWATI, A.; GIBB, F. How students use e-books - reading or referring?. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, v. 13, p. 1-14, 2008.
  • PARK, J-R.; TOSAKA, Y. metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections: criteria, semantics, and mechanisms. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v. 48, p. 696–715, 2010.
  • RAFIQ, S.; WARRAICH, N.F. Utilization of e-books among undergraduate medical students at Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries, v. 17, p. 191-200, 2016.
  • RAGAN, A.; KAMMER, J.; ATKINS, C.; BURRESS, R. Learning to read online: the effect of instruction on e-textbook use. Library Hi Tech, v. 37, p. 293-311, 2019.
  • RAVIT H.D.; DANA, T. Assessing metadata and controlling quality in scholarly ebooks. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v. 53, p. 801-24, 2015.
  • ROJESKI, M. User perceptions of ebooks versus print books for class reserves in an academic library. Reference Services Review, v. 40, p. 228-41, 2012.
  • SÁNCHEZ-MUÑOZ, E. Acceso a las plataformas de préstamo digital: integración vs. atomización. Profesional de la Información, v. 27, p. 582-94, 2018.
  • SEWELL, B.B.; LINK, F.E. Developing workflows for short-term loans of ebooks as an adjunct to ILL: Part Two. Technical Services Quarterly, v. 34, p. 34-9, 2017.
  • SMITH, S.; RODRIGUEZ, A.; MILLER, E.D.; XU, L. The relationship between the technology acceptance model and preference for ebooks at a large research university. Library Hi Tech News, v. 36, p. 13-15, 2019.
  • STACHOKAS, G. Electronic resources and mission creep: reorganizing the library for the twenty-first century. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, v. 21, p. 206-12, 2009.
  • STACHOKAS, G. The problem for libraries in the twenty-first century: the need to accept a paradigm shift. In: After the book information services for the 21st century. Chandos Information Professional Series, p. 33-47, 2014.
  • STACHOKAS, G. The role of the electronic resources librarian. Elsevier. 2019
  • TINGLE, N. AND K. TEETER. Browsing the intangible: does visibility lead to increased use?. Technical Services Quarterly, v. 35, p. 164-74, 2019.
  • UNESP. Relatório anuário estatístico UNESP 2019 [São Paulo: UNESP]. Disponível em: https://ape.unesp.br/anuario/pdf/Anuario_2019.pdf
  • Unicamp. Relatório anuário estatístico Unicamp 2020 [Campinas: Unicamp]. Disponível em: https://www.aeplan.unicamp.br/anuario/2020/anuario2020.pdf
  • USP. Relatório anuário estatístico USP 2019 [São Paulo: USP]. Disponível em: https://uspdigital.usp.br/anuario/AnuarioControle#
  • VICENTE-GARCÍA, R.; FERNÁNDEZ-MIEDES, L. Préstamo de libros electrónicos en bibliotecas públicas. La experiencia de ebiblio Madrid. Profesional de la Información, v. 27, p. 698-706, 2018.
  • WAKELING, S.; RUTTER, S.; BIRDI, B.; PINFIELD, S. Interlending and resource sharing in UK public libraries: A mixed methods study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, v. 50, p. 168-85, 2018.
  • WIERSMA, G; TOWSTIADI, E. Inconsistencies between Academic E-Book Platforms: a comparison of metadata and search results. Libraries and the Academy, v. 17, p. 617-48, 2017.
  • WU, A.; A.M. MITCHELL. Mass management of e-book catalog records: approaches, challenges, and solutions. Library Resources & Technical Services, v. 54, p. 164-74, 2010.
  • YUAN, W., M.V. BALLEGOOIE; J.L. ROBERTSON. Ebooks versus print books: format preferences in an academic library. Collection Management, v. 43, p. 28-48, 2018.
  • ZHAO, S.; W. ZHAO. Addressing the challenge: cataloguing electronic books in academic libraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, v. 5, p. 93-103, 2010.
  • ZHU, X. E-book ILL in academic libraries: a three-year trend report. Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 44, p. 343-51, 2018.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet