Tecnología educativa en la educación superiorprácticas emergentes para la enseñanza de futuros educadores

Références bibliographiques

• Bartolomé, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2018). Blended learning: Panorama y perspectivas. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18842
• Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54, 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
• Castañeda, L., Salinas, J., & Adell, J. (2020). Hacia una visión contemporánea de la Tecnología Educativa. Digital Education Review, 0 (37), 240–268.
• Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.
• Connolly, C., O Gorman, S., Hall, T., & Hijón-Neira, R. (2020). Pre-service teacher perceptions in integrating maker-centered learning in their mathematics and education initial teacher education programme. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.3.2778
• Dabbagh, N., & Castañeda, L. (2020). The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423- 020-09831-z
• De Paulo Moura, K. M. (2019). Systematic review on digital literacy in teacher training. Texto LivreLinguagem E Tecnologia, 12(3), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.17851/1983-3652.12.3.128-143
• Deschryver, M., D., Leahy, S. M., Koehler, M. J., & Wolf, L. G. (2013). The habits of mind necessary to generate new ways of teaching in a career of constant change. TechTrends, 57(3), 40 – 46.
• Donner, J., Warr, M., Leahy, S.M., & Mishra, P. (2020). Embracing failure in a first-year technology course. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.3.2873
• Duarte, A., Guzmán, M. D., & Yot, C. R. (2018). Aportaciones de la formación blended learning al desarrollo profesional docente. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.19013
• Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2020). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
• Ferrarin, E. (2020, August 31). Teachers in District 220 find creative ways to teach virtually. Daily Herald. https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20200831/teachers-in-district-220-find-creative-ways-toteach-virtually
• Ferrés, J., Masanet, M.-J., & Mateus, J.-C. (2018). Three paradoxes in the approach to educational technology in the education studies of the Spanish universities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018- 0097-y
• Flessner, R. (2012). Addressing the research/practice divide in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 34(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2012.677739
• Floridi, L. (2020). The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6
• Kauppi, S., Muukkonen, H., Suorsa, T., & Takala, M. (2020). I still miss human contact, but this is more flexible—Paradoxes in virtual learning interaction and multidisciplinary collaboration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1101–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12929
• INTEF. (2017). Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. http://blog.educalab.es/intef/2016/12/22/marco-comun-de-competencia-digitaldocente-2017-intef
• ISTE. (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators. International Society for Technology in Education.
• Leander, K. M., & Burriss, S. K. (2020). Critical literacy for a posthuman world: When people read, and become, with machines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1262–1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12924
• Marín, V. (2020). Technology-enhanced Learning Design of a Pre-service Teacher Training Course in a Research-based Learning context, Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.3.2766
• Oliver, M. (2016). What is technology. In N. Rushby & D. Surry (Eds.), Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (Edición: 1). Wiley Handbooks in Education.
• Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
• Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
• Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Offce of the European Union.
• Rodriguez Moreno, J., Agreda Montoro, M., & Ortiz Colon, A. M. (2019). Changes in Teacher Training within the TPACK Model Framework: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 11(7), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071870
• Seals, C., Mehta, S., Wolf, L.G., & Marcotte, C. (2017). Theory and implementation of an innovative teacher professional development program. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 36(3), 219-235
• Silva, J., Morales, M.-J., Lázaro-Cantabrana, J.-L., Gisbert, M., Miranda, P., Rivoir, A., & Onetto, A. (2019). Digital teaching competence in initial training: Case studies from Chile and Uruguay. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(0), 93. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3822
• Sheridan, M. P., Lemieux, A., Do Nascimento, A., & Arnseth, H. C. (2020). Intra‐active entanglements: What posthuman and new materialist frameworks can offer the learning sciences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12928
• Smith, E. E., & Hayman, R. (2016). Decision making and problems of evidence for emerging educational technologies. In The Best Available Evidence (pp. 147-166). Brill Sense.
• Strauss, V. (2020). Perspective | New concerns raised about a well-known digital learning platform. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/06/25/new-concernsraised-about-well-known-digital-learning-platform/
• Tur, G., & Ramírez Mera, U. (2020). aprendizaje autorregulado en el PLE a través de una estrategia didáctica basada en portafolios con blogs y microblogs. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.3.2799
• UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
• Villagra Sobrino, S.L., Jorrín Abellán, I.M., Zubillaga del Río, A., Fernández Díaz, E.M., Fernández Olaskoaga, L., Gutiérrez Esteban, P., & Abella García, V. (2020). Webinars 360: Una Experiencia Formativa Transnacional de la Red Universitaria de Tecnología Educativa. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.3.2775
• Wexler, N. (2019, December 19). How classroom technology is holding students back. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/12/19/131155/classroom-technologyholding-students-back-edtech-kids-education/
• Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641