La acción política como performance socialel caso de las imágenes de las protestas contra Nicolás Maduro

  1. Pedro Alberto Cruz Sánchez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revue:
El Ornitorrinco Tachado: Revista de Artes Visuales

ISSN: 2448-6949 2448-6930

Année de publication: 2017

Número: 6

Pages: 55-66

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: El Ornitorrinco Tachado: Revista de Artes Visuales

Résumé

This paper links two fields of research scarcely connected: Visual Studies and Performance Studies. The chosen case to analyze has been the enormous amount of images on the demonstrations against the government of Nicolas Maduro, which have been distributed through mass media and social media from the beginning of 2017. Three aspects in particular have been analyzed: 1) the definition of social performance as a way of acting adopted by the civil uprisings throughout the twenty-one century; 2) the difference between “speech” and “writing” as modes of representation of the authority language and the protest language; and 3) the idea of “visual stereotype”, incarnated in those specific bodies that have become global icons of the protests against Maduro

Références bibliographiques

  • Alexander, J.; B. Glessen y J. Mast (eds.) 2006. Social Performance. Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, Cambridge y New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Azoulay, A. 2001. Death Showcase. The Power of Image in Contemporary Democracy, Cambridge, The Mit Press.
  • Bishop, C. 2012. Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, London y New York, Verso.
  • Burke, P. J. y D. Reitzes 1981. “The Link Between Identity and Role Performance” en Social Psychology Quaterly, núm. 44, pp. 83-92.
  • Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life. The Powers of Mourning and Violence, New York y London, Verso.
  • Derrida, J. 2005. De la gramatología, México y Buenos Aires, Siglo xxi.
  • Didi-Huberman, G. 2017. Insurrecciones, Barcelona y París, Museu Nacional d’Art de Catalunya y Jeu de Paume.
  • Fraser, M. y M. Greco (eds.) 2005. The Body. A Reader, London y New York, Routledge.
  • Goffman, E. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh.
  • Guattari, F. 2009. Soft Subversions. Texts and Interviews 1977-1985, Los Angeles, Semiotext(e).
  • Herbert, S. 2006. Citizens, Cops, and Power. Recognizing the Limits of Community, Chicago y London, The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hochstetler, K. 2006. “Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidencial Falls in South America” en Comparative Politics, núm. 38, pp. 401-418.
  • Huet, M. 1983. “Monstruosity and Representation” en Representations, núm. 4, pp. 73-87.
  • Kreimer, S. F. 2001. “Tecnologies of Protest: Insurgent Social Movements and the First Amendment in the Era of Internet” en University of Pennsylvania Law Review, núm. 150, pp. 119-171.
  • Lentricchia, F. y J. McAuliffe 2003. Crimes of Art +Terror, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
  • Razi, H. 1987. “The Nexus of Legitimacy and Performance: The Lessons of the Iranian Revolution” en Comparative Politics, núm. 19, pp. 453-469.
  • Rorty, R. 1978. “Philosophy as a Kind of Writing: An Essay on Derrida” en New Literary History, núm. 10, pp. 141-160.
  • Schechner, R. 1973. “Drama, Script, Theatre and Performance” en The Drama Review: TDR, núm. 17, pp. 5-36.
  • Tumas-Serna, J. 1992. “The ‘Nueva Canción’ Movement and its Mass-Mediated Performance Context” en Latin American Music Review, núm. 13, pp. 139-157.
  • Turner, V. 1979. “Dramatic Ritual/Ritual Drama: Performative and Reflexive Anthropology” en The Kenyon Review, núm. 1, pp. 80-93.
  • Worthen, W. B. 1998. “Drama, Performativity and Performance” en PMLA, núm. 113, pp. 1093-1107.
  • Zaccaro, S. J; C. Peterson y S. Walker 1987. “Self-Serving Attributions for Individual and Group Performance” en Social Psychology Quaterly, núm. 50, pp. 257-263.