Naturaleza y valor de la Literatura

  1. Matilde Carrasco Barranco 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia, Spain
Revista:
Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin

ISSN: 2254-0601

Año de publicación: 2019

Título del ejemplar: Una perspectiva humanista para nuestro tiempo: La revaloración de la retórica y de la literatura como herramientas filosóficas

Volumen: 8

Número: 10

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3579598 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin

Resumen

This essay analyses several questions in relation to the definition, interpretation and value of literary works, and it proposes to understand literature inside the institution that rules the kind of attitude, attention and evaluation that seem appropriate to it. Through that analysis, a broad account of literary value, as aesthetic value, will emerge in order to cope with the moral and cognitive dimension of literature, without giving up possible instrumental benefits along those lines. On the other hand, the nature of interpretation and its consequences for literary criticism will also be addressed, as well as the articulation between interpretation and artistic appreciation.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Este trabajo recoge el cap?tulo que con el mismo t?tulo figura en M? Jos? Alcaraz y Alessandro Bertinetto (compiladores) Las artes y la filosof?a (M?xico: UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Filos?ficas, 2016, pp. 279-334; ISBN UNAM: 978-607-02-8427-4). Desde aqu?, mi profundo agradecimiento a la editorial por haber cedido los derechos para su reproducci?n.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alcaraz León, MªJosé (2008). «Modos de estetización y valores morales en el arte», Disturbis, 3, disponible en: http://www.disturbis.esteticauab.org/Disturbis234/MA.html [última consulta: 15/01/2015].
  • Austin, John L. (2004). Cómo hacer cosas con palabras, trad. G.R. Carrió y E.A. Rabossi, Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Barnes, Anette (1988). On Interpretation, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Barthes, Roland (1982). El placer del texto, trad. N. Rosa, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Barthes, Roland (2001). S/Z, trad. N. Rosa, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Beardsley, Monroe C. (1980). Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, Hackett Indiánapolis.
  • Beardsley, Monroe C., y WIMSATT, William K. (1978). «The Intentional Fallacy», en Joseph Margolis (comp.), Philosophy Looks at the Arts, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 367–380
  • Bermúdez, José L. y GARDNER, Sebastian (2003). Art and Morality, Londres/Nueva York: Routlegde.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1998). La distinción: criterios y bases sociales del gusto, trad. M.C. Ruiz de Elvira, Madrid: Taurus.
  • Bozal, Valeriano (1997) «Mímesis», en V. Bozal Historia de las ideas estéticas, Madrid: Historia 16, pp. 39–102.
  • Brooks, Cleanth (1947). The Well–Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry, Londres: Methuen.
  • Carroll, Noël (2002). «Andy Kaufman and the Philosophy of Interpretation», en M. Krausz (comp.), Is There a Single Right Interpretation?, Penn State University Press, University Park, pp. 319–344.
  • Carroll, Noël (2004). «Art and the Moral Realm», en The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, P. Kivy (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 126–151.
  • Carroll, Noël (1997). «Arts, Narrative, and Moral Understanding», en J. Levinson (comp.), Aesthetics and Ethics, pp. 126–160.
  • Carroll, Noël (2005). Filosofía del terror o paradojas del corazón, trad. G. Vilar, Madrid: Antonio Machado.
  • Carroll, Noël (2000). «Interpretation and Intention», Metaphilosophy, 31(1–2) pp. 75–95.
  • Carroll, Noël (1996). «Moderate Moralism», British Journal of Aesthetics, 36(3), pp. 223–238.
  • Carroll, Noël (2009). On Criticism, Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Carroll, Noël (2002). Una filosofía del arte de masas, trad. J. Alcoriza Vento, Madrid: Antonio Machado.
  • Coplan, Amy (2004). «Empathic Engagement with Narrative Fictions», The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62(2), pp.141–152.
  • Currie, Gregory (2004). Art and Minds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Currie, Gregory (1990). The Nature of Fiction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Danto, Arthur, (2008). «Ontology, Criticism, and the Riddle of Art versus Non– Art in The Transfiguration of the Commonplace», en Contemporary Aesthetics, 6, p. 33; también disponible en: <http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID =505>.
  • Davies, David, «Fiction», en The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, B. Gaut y D.M. Lopes (eds.), Londres: Routledge, pp. 263–273.
  • Davies, Stephen (1991). Definitions of Art, Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
  • Derrida, Jacques (1971). De la Gramatología, trad. O. del Barco y C. Ceretti, Siglo xxi, Buenos Aires.
  • Derrida, Jacques (1989). La escritura y la diferencia, trad. P. Peñalver, Anthropos, Barcelona.
  • Fish, Stanley (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • García Gabaldón, Jesús (2000), «La forma del lenguaje: poética formal y estética literaria», en V. Bozal (comp.), Historia de las ideas estéticas y de las teorías artísticas contemporáneas, vol. II, Madrid: Visor, pp. 39–59.
  • García Leal, José (2002). Filosofía del arte, Síntesis, Madrid.
  • Gaut, Berys (2001). «Art and Ethics», en The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, B. Gaut y D.M. Lopes (eds.), pp. 341–352.
  • Gaut, Berys (1997). «The Ethical Criticism of Art», en J. Levinson (comp.), Aesthetics and Ethics, pp. 182–203.
  • Goldman, Alan (1990). «Interpreting Art and Literature», The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 48(3), pp. 205–214.
  • Goldman, Alan (2006). «The Experiential Account of Aesthetic Value», The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 64 (3), pp. 333–342.
  • Hirsch, Eric D. Jr., (1967) Validity in Interpretation, Yale University Press, New Haven.
  • Hyman, Lawrence (1984). «Morality and Literature: The Necessary Conflict», British Journal of Aesthetics, 24(2), pp. 149–155.
  • Iseminger, Gary (1993). «An Intentional Demonstration», en ISEMINGER, G. (comp.) Intention and Interpretation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 76–96.
  • Jacobson, Daniel y D’Arms, Justin (2000). «The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61(1) pp. 65–90.
  • Jakobson, Roman (1984). Ensayos de lingüística general, trad. J.M. Pujol y J. Cabanes. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Kieran, Mathew (1996) «Art, Imagination, and the Cultivation of Morals», Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54(4), pp. 337–351.
  • Kieran, Mathew (comp.) (2006) Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Kristeller, Paul O. (1992). «The Modern System of Arts», en P. Kivy (comp.) Essays on the History of Aesthetics, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, 1992, pp. 3–64.
  • Lamarque, Peter (1983). «Fiction and Reality», en P. Lamarque (comp.), Philosophy and Fiction, Essays in Literary Aesthetics, pp. 52–72.
  • Lamarque, Peter. (1996). Fictional Points of View, Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
  • Lamarque, Peter. (2001). «Literature» en The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, B. Gaut y D.M. Lopes (eds.), pp. 449–461.
  • Lamarque, Peter (1983). Philosophy and Fiction: Essays in Literary Aesthetics, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press (Reimpreso con un nuevo prefacio en CyberEditions, 2000.)
  • Lamarque, Peter and OLSEN, Stein Haugom (2004) «Literature: Pleasure Restored», en P. Kivy (comp.), The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, pp. 195–214.
  • Lamarque, Peter and Olsen, Stein Haugom (1994). Truth, Fiction and Literature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Levinson, Jerrold (1996). The Pleasure of Aesthetics, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  • Levinson, Jerrold (comp.) (1997), Aesthetics and Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Livingston, Paisley (1996). «Arguing over Intentions», Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 50: pp. 615–633.
  • Lodge, David (1977). The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy and the Typology of Modern Literature, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  • Lyas, Colin (1969) «The Semantic Definition of Literature», Journal of Philosophy, 66 (3): pp. 81–95.
  • Lyas, Colin (1983). «The Relevance of the Author’s Sincerity» en P. Lamarque (comp.) Philosophy and Fiction, pp. 17–37.
  • Maes, Hans (2010) «Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art», British Journal of Aesthetics, 50 (2): pp. 121–138.
  • Murdoch, Iris (1971). The Sovereignty of Good, Nueva York: Schocken.
  • Nathan, Daniel O. (2006). «Art, Meaning, and Artist’s Meaning», en Kieran (comp.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, pp. 282–293.
  • Novitz, David (1992). The Boundaries of Art, Philadelfia: Temple University Press.
  • Nussbaum, Martha (1990) Love´s Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Oksenberg Rorty, Amelie (comp.)(1989), Explaining Emotions, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Olsen, Stein Haugom (1976–1997). «Defining a Literary Work», Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 35: pp. 133–142.
  • Olsen, Stein Haugom (1987), The End of Literary Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Osborne, Peter (2004). «Art Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Criticism, Art History And Contemporary Art», Art History, 27 (4): pp. 651–670.
  • Plantinga, Carl (1999). «The Scene of Empathy and the Human Face in Film» en C. Plantinga y G.M. Smith (comps.), Passionate Views: Film, Cognition and Emotion, Baltimore/Londres: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 239–256.
  • Rorty, Richard (1995). Consecuencias del pragmatismo, trad. J.M. Esteban Cloquell, Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Rorty, Richard (1996). Contingencia, Ironía y Solidaridad, trad. A.E. Sinnot, Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Rosebury, Brian (1997). «Irrecoverable Intentions and Literary Interpretation», British Journal of Aesthetics, 37(1): pp. 15–30.
  • Rubinstein, Raphael (2003). «A Quiet Crisis», Art in America, 91(3): pp. 39–45.
  • Russell, Bertrand (1905). «On Denoting», Mind, New Series, 14 (56): pp. 479–493.
  • Searle, John (1975). «The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse», New Literary History, 6 (2): pp. 319–332.
  • Shiner, Larry (2004) La invención del Arte, trad. E. Hyde y E. Julibert, Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Shklovski, Viktor. (1971) Sobre la prosa literaria, s/trad., Barcelona: Planeta.
  • Stecker, Robert (1997). Artworks: Definition, Meaning, Value, Pensylvania State University Press, University Park.
  • Stecker, Robert (2006) «Interpretation and the Problem of the Relevant Intention», en Kieran, Mathew (comp.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, pp. 270–281.
  • Tatarkiewicz, Wladislaw (1996). Historia de seis ideas, trad. F. Rodriguez Martín, Tecnos, Madrid.
  • Thiebaut, Carlos (1992) «De la filosofía a la literatura: el caso de Richard Rorty», Daimon, 5: pp. 133–154.
  • Valdés Villanueva, Luis (comp.) (1991). La búsqueda del significado, Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Walton, Kendal (1990). «Fearing Fictions», Journal of Philosophy, 75 (1): pp. 5–27.
  • Walton, Kendal (1990). Mimesis as Make–Believe, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet