Calidad de la información contable y esfuerzo del auditorel caso español

  1. Antonio Fenoll-Bernal 1
  2. Jose Serrano Madrid 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
Revista:
Small Business International Review

ISSN: 2531-0046

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 4

Número: 1

Páginas: 52-68

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.26784/SBIR.V4I1.244 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Small Business International Review

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar si los auditores son capaces de detectar la gestión de resultados en sus empresas auditadas y si ante un incremento en el esfuerzo, el nivel de devengos discrecionales será menor. Como singular contribución, se mide el esfuerzo del auditor mediante las horas efectivamente empleadas, al contrario que trabajos anteriores que se basan en honorarios u horas estimadas o subrogados de estas. Asimismo, la muestra utilizada está compuesta por pequeñas y medianas firmas de auditoría, lo que le aporta un valor añadido por ser este segmento del mercado de auditoría más competitivo. Los resultados evidencian que el cliente reduce los devengos anormales positivos del resultado ante un incremento del esfuerzo del auditor, poniendo así en valor su figura como garante de la información financiera, contribuyendo al debate sobre la calidad de las pequeñas firmas. En lo que respecta a los ajustes por devengo negativos, se puede interpretar una pasividad del auditor ante el conservadurismo contable y un efecto aprendizaje en el cliente, que aumenta la manipulación negativa de resultados conforme se incrementa la duración contractual con el audito

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition
  • timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacceco.2004.04.001
  • BECK, P. J., & WU, M. G. H. (2006). Learning by Doing and Audit Quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1506/AXU4-Q7Q9-3YAB-4QE0
  • Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
  • Bedard, J. C. (1989). An archival survey of audit program planning. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9, 81–102
  • Bell, T. B., Marrs, F. O., Solomon, I., & Thomas, H. (1997). Auditing Organizations Through a Strategic-Systems Lens: The KPMG Business Measurement Process. Montvale (NJ), USA: KPMG.
  • Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., & Shackelford, D. A. (2001). Auditors’ Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475- 679X.00002
  • Bell, T. B., Doogar, R., & Solomon, I. (2008). Audit Labor Usage and Fees under Business Risk Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 729–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00291.x
  • Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2010). Do the Big 4 and the Second-tier firms provide audits of similar quality? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4), 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaccpubpol.2010.06.007
  • Butler, M., Leone, A. J., & Willenborg, M. (2004). An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2), 139–165. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.06.004
  • Cameran, M. (2005). Audit Fees and the Large Auditor Premium in the Italian Market. International Journal of Auditing, 9(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00205.x
  • Caramanis, C., & Lennox, C. (2008). Audit effort and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.05.002
  • Carlson, S. J., & Bathala, C. T. (1997). Ownership Differences and Firms’ Income Smoothing Behavior. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00101
  • Chiang, H., He, L., & Lai, C.-H. (2012). The Governance Effect of Institutional Stakeholders on FamilyControlled Companies’ Earnings Management. Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(4). https://doi. org/10.22495/cocv9i4art6
  • Coppens, L., & Peek, E. (2005). An analysis of earnings management by European private firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. intaccaudtax.2005.01.002
  • Costigan, M. L., & Simon, D. T. (1995). Auditor materiality judgment and consistency modifications: Further evidence from SFAS 96. Advances in Accounting, 13, 207–222.
  • DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
  • DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1993). Factors Related to Auditor-Client Disagreements over IncomeIncreasing Accounting Methods. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(2), 415–431. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00889.x
  • DeFond, M., Erkens, D. H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching. Management Science, 63(11), 3628– 3649. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2528
  • Dye, R. A. (1993). Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 887–914. https://doi.org/10.1086/261908
  • Dye, R. A. (1995). Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 75–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00375-F
  • Eilifsen, A., Knechel, W. R., & Wallage, P. (2001). Application of the Business Risk Audit Model: A Field Study. Accounting Horizons, 15(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.3.193
  • Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (1999). Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 135–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00577.x
  • Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.2308/ aud.1999.18.2.17
  • Francis, J., & Simon, D. (1987). A Test of Audit Pricing in the small client segment of the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 145–157. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/248051
  • Gill de Albornoz, B., & Illueca, M. (2007). La calidad de los ajustes por devengo no afecta al coste de la deuda de las pymes españolas. Investigaciones Económicas, 31(1), 79–117. Retrieved from https://www. fundacionsepi.es/investigacion/revistas/paperArchive/Ene2007/v31i1a3.pdf
  • Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2004). Audit Fees: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.512642
  • Hair, J. F. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Madrid, España: Prentice Hall Iberia.
  • Hillegeist, S. A. (1999). Financial Reporting and Auditing Under Alternative Damage Apportionment Rules. The Accounting Review, 74(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.3.347
  • Ibáñez, P. C., & Pechuán, A. M. (2011). Nonaudit services provided by incumbent auditors and earnings management: Evidence of auditor independence from an EU country. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 40(152), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2011.10779712
  • Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2001). Engagement Planning, Bid Pricing, and Client Response in the Market for Initial Attest Engagements. The Accounting Review, 76(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.2308/ accr.2001.76.2.199
  • Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491047
  • Kellogg, R. L. (1984). Accounting activities, security prices, and class action lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(84)90024-7
  • Kinney Jr, W. R., & Martin, R. D. (1994). Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit-related adjustment studies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13, 151–156. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roger_Martin4/publication/266136992_Does_ Auditing_Reduce_Bias_in_Financial_Reporting_A_Review_of_Audit_Adjustment_Studies/ links/5425a62f0cf238c6ea75011e.pdf
  • Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 Differences in AuditQuality Proxies Be Attributed to Client Characteristics? The Accounting Review, 86(1), 259–286. https:// doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000009
  • Lemon, W. M., Tatum, K. W., & Turley, W. S. (2000). Developments in the audit methodologies of large accounting firms. London, UK: Auditing Practices Board.
  • Maletta, M. J., & Kida, T. (1993). The Effect of Risk Factors on Auditors’ Configural Information Processing. The Accounting Review, 68(3), 681–691. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/248209
  • Mock, T. J., & Wright, A. M. (1999). Are Audit Program Plans Risk-Adjusted? AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.1999.18.1.55
  • Monterrey Mayoral, J., y Sánchez Segura, A. (2007). Un estudio empírico de los honorarios del auditor. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de La Empresa, 10(32), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138- 5758(07)70092-0
  • Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2003). Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation? The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779–799. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.779
  • Nelson, M. W., Elliott, J. A., & Tarpley, R. L. (2002). Evidence from Auditors about Managers’ and Auditors’ Earnings Management Decisions. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.2308/ accr.2002.77.s-1.175
  • Niemi, L. (2004). Auditor size and audit pricing: evidence from small audit firms. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000237151
  • O’Keefe, T. B., Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1994). The Production of Audit Services: Evidence from a Major Public Accounting Firm. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491284
  • Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. (2010). National and Office-Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 679X.2009.00363.x
  • Simunic, D. A. (1980). The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
  • Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1996). The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15, 132–134 Retrieved from https://search. proquest.com/docview/216733305?accountid=17225
  • St. Pierre, K., & Anderson, J. A. (1984). An Analysis of the Factors Associated with Lawsuits against Public Accountants. The Accounting Review, 59(2), 242–263. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/ stable/247297
  • Teoh, S. H., & Wong, T. J. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 346–366. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/248405
  • Wallace, W. A. (1987). International Accounting and Likely Approaches to Future Inquiry: An Overview of Research. Management International Review (MIR), 27(2), 4–25.
  • Warfield, T. D., Wild, J. J., & Wild, K. L. (1995). Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(1), 61–91. https://doi. org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00393-J
  • Winograd, B. N., Gerson, J. S., & Berlin, B. L. (2000). Audit Practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.176
  • Wright, A., & Wright, S. (1997). An Examination of Factors Affecting the Decision to Waive Audit Adjustments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 12(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9701200102
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet