Análisis de la prima de riego en las mujeres auditorasel caso español

  1. Jisela Marivel Aguilar Agreda
  2. Jose Serrano
  3. Mercedes Bernabé Pérez
Revista:
Small Business International Review

ISSN: 2531-0046

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 3

Número: 2

Páginas: 17-33

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.26784/SBIR.V3I2.193 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Small Business International Review

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este estudio investiga la aplicación, por parte de las socias auditoras, de una prima de riesgo en las auditoras españolas de pequeñas y medianas empresas como herramienta de cobertura. Mediante técnicas econométricas se ha realizado un análisis univariante y multivariante a 2.536 observaciones de clientes auditados por veintiuna firmas de auditoría de pequeña y media dimensión durante el periodo 2002 y 2014. Los resultados sugieren que las empresas auditadas pagan unas tarifas de auditoría más altas cuando el informe de auditoría es firmado por una mujer. La evidencia combinada en este estudio sugiere la existencia de una prima de riesgo femenina. Esta prima en los honorarios puede existir por las diferencias de género existentes a la hora de percibir y tolerar el riesgo. A diferencia de estudios anteriores se controla el esfuerzo del auditor a través de las horas dedicadas en cada uno de los trabajos, centrando el análisis en el segmento de pequeñas y medianas firmas de auditoría

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Referencias Beattie, V., Goodacre, A., Pratt, K., & Stevenson, J. (2001). The determinants of audit fees—evidence from
  • the voluntary sector. Accounting and Business Research, 31(4), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014 788.2001.9729619
  • Bell, T. B., Doogar, R., & Solomon, I. (2008). Audit Labor Usage and Fees under Business Risk Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 729–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00291.x
  • Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., & Shackelford, D. A. (2001). Auditors’ Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475- 679X.00002
  • BOE. (2015). Ley 22/2015, de 20 de julio, de Auditoría de Cuentas. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/eli/ es/l/2015/07/20/22
  • BOICAC. (2015). Norma internacional de auditoría de adaptación para su aplicación en España (NIA-ES) 200. Objetivos globales del auditor independiente y realización de la auditoría de conformidad con las normas internacionales de auditoría. Retrieved from http://www.icac.meh.es/
  • Brinn, T., Peel, M. J., & Roberts, R. (1994). Audit Fee Determinants Of Independent & Subsidiary Unquoted Companies In The Uk—An Exploratory Study. The British Accounting Review, 26(2), 101–121. https://doi. org/10.1006/bare.1994.1009
  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
  • Carcello, J. V., & Palmrose, Z.-V. (1994). Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491436
  • Chan, P., Ezzamel, M., & Gwilliam, D. (1993). Determinants of Audit Fees for Quoted UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 20(6), 765–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00292.x
  • Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2001). A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
  • DeFond, M. L., Francis, J. R., & Wong, T. J. (2000). Auditor Industry Specialization and Market Segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.49
  • Dwyer, P. D., Gilkeson, J. H., & List, J. A. (2002). Gender differences in revealed risk taking: evidence from mutual fund investors. Economics Letters, 76(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00045-9
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2001.9729619
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2001.9729619
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00291.x%0D
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00002
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00002
  • https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2015/07/20/22
  • https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2015/07/20/22
  • http://www.icac.meh.es/
  • https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1994.1009
  • https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1994.1009
  • https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
  • https://doi.org/10.2307/2491436
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00292.x
  • https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
  • https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.49
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765%2802%2900045-9
  • Francis, J. R., & Simon, D. T. (1987). A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-Client Segment of the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 145–157. Recovered www.jstor.org/stable/248051
  • Gold, A., Hunton, J. E., & Gomaa, M. I. (2009). The Impact of Client and Auditor Gender on Auditors’ Judgments (Retracted). Accounting Horizons, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.1.1
  • Gonthier‐Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2007). Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710718654
  • Graham, J. F., Stendardi, E. J., Myers, J. K., & Graham, M. J. (2002). Gender differences in investment strategies: an information processing perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320210415953
  • Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2014). Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Modified Audit Opinions. SSRN Electronic Journal, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1583206
  • Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2015). The Female Audit Fee Premium. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(4), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51079
  • Houston, R. W., Peters, M. F., & Pratt, J. H. (1999). The Audit Risk Model, Business Risk and Audit‐Planning Decisions. The Accounting Review, 74(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.3.281
  • Instituto de Censores Jurados de Cuentas de España (2016). Informe sobre la situación de la auditoría en España para los ejercicios 2006-2016. Madrid, España.
  • Ittonen, K. & Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female Auditors and Accruals Quality. Accounting Horizons, 27, 205-228. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060797
  • Ittonen, K., & Peni, E. (2012). Auditor’s Gender and Audit Fees. International Journal of Auditing, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2011.00438.x
  • Ittonen, K., Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2012). Female Auditors and Accruals Quality. SSRN Electronic Journal, 27(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060797
  • Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are Women More Risk Averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x
  • Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2003). Risk Management in Client Acceptance Decisions. The Accounting Review, 78(4), 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.1003
  • Knechel, W. R., Niemi, L., & Zerni, M. (2013). Empirical Evidence on the Implicit Determinants of Compensation in Big 4 Audit Partnerships. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(2), 349–387. https://doi. org/10.1111/1475-679X.12009
  • Lys, T., & Watts, R. L. (1994). Lawsuits against Auditors. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 65-93. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2491440
  • Monterrey-Mayoral, J., & Sánchez-Segura, A. (2007). Un estudio empírico de los honorarios del auditor. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de La Empresa, 10(32), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138- 5758(07)70092-0
  • Niemi, L. (2004). Auditor size and audit pricing: evidence from small audit firms. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000237151
  • NORMA UNE-ISO 22301. (2015). ISO 22301: Gestión de la Continuidad del Negocio.
  • O’sullivan, N. (2000). The Impact of Board Composition and Ownership on Audit Quality: Evidence from Large UK Companies. The British Accounting Review, 32(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1006/ bare.2000.0139
  • Olsen, R. A., & Cox, C. M. (2001). The Influence of Gender on the Perception and Response to Investment Risk: The Case of Professional Investors. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327760JPFM0201_3
  • http://www.jstor.org/stable/248051
  • https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.1.1
  • https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710718654
  • https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320210415953
  • https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1583206
  • https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51079
  • https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.3.281
  • https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060797
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2011.00438.x
  • https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060797
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x
  • https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.1003
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12009
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12009
  • https://doi.org/10.2307/2491440
  • https://doi.org/10.2307/2491440
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-5758%2807%2970092-0
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-5758%2807%2970092-0
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000237151
  • https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2000.0139
  • https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2000.0139
  • https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327760JPFM0201_3
  • Palmrose, Z.-V. (1986). Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490806
  • Pratt, J., & Stice, J. D. (1994). The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees. The Accounting Review, 69(4), 639–656. Recovered www.jstor.org/stable/248435
  • Simunic, D. A. (1980). The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
  • Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1996). The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15, 119–134. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/246424855_The_Impact_of_Litigation_Risk_on_Audit_Pricing_A_Review_of_The_ Economics_and_the_Evidence
  • Stice, J. D. (1991). Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 516–533. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/247807
  • Sundén, A. E., & Surette., B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/116920
  • Watson, J., & McNaughton, M. (2007). Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Expected Retirement Benefits. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(4), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v63.n4.4749
  • Watson, J., & Robinson, S. (2003). Adjusting for risk in comparing the performances of maleand female-controlled SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 773–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883- 9026(02)00128-3
  • Zhan-Shu, S. (2000). Auditor resignations: clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(2), 173–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00019-7
  • https://doi.org/10.2307/2490806
  • http://www.jstor.org/stable/248435
  • https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246424855_The_Impact_of_Litigation_Risk_on_Audit_Pricing_A_Review_of_The_Economics_and_the_Evidence
  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246424855_The_Impact_of_Litigation_Risk_on_Audit_Pricing_A_Review_of_The_Economics_and_the_Evidence
  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246424855_The_Impact_of_Litigation_Risk_on_Audit_Pricing_A_Review_of_The_Economics_and_the_Evidence
  • ttps://www.jstor.org/stable/247807
  • ttps://www.jstor.org/stable/247807
  • https://www.jstor.org/stable/116920
  • https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v63.n4.4749
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026%2802%2900128-3
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026%2802%2900128-3
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101%2800%2900019-7
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet