The importance of the ”strategic game” to frame the political discourse in Twitter during 2015 Spanish Regional Elections

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aharony, N. (2012). Twitter use by three political leaders: an exploratory analysis. Online Information Review 36(4) 587-603. doi:10.1108/14684521211254086
• Altheide, D. L. (2004). Media logic and political communication. Political Communication 21(3), 293-296. doi: 10.1080/10584600490481307
• Ammann, S. L., (2010). Why Do They Tweet? The Use of Twitter by U.S. Senate Candidates in 2010. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1725477 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1725477
• Ampofo, L, Anstead, N. & O'Loughlin, B. (2011): “Trust, Confidence, and Credibility: Citizen responses on Twitter to opinion polls during the 2010 UK General Election”. Information, Communication & Society 14(6), 850-871.
• Bekafigo, M. A., & Mcbride, A. (2013). Who tweets about politics? Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011 gubernatorial elections. Social Sciences Computer Review 31(5), 625-643. doi: 0894439313490405
• Bernal A. I. & Congosto, M. (2014). Campaña electoral de las elecciones europeas: medios de comunicación vs. viralidad de la Red. Retrieved from: http://www.alice-comunicacionpolitica.com/abrir-ponencia.php?f=581-F541965055811410950405-ponencia-1.pdf
• Berrocal, S., Campos-Domínguez, E. & Redondo-García, M. (2014). Prosumidores mediático en la comunicación política: el politainment en YouTube. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación 22 (43), 65/72.
• Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of communication 61(2), 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). #Ausvotes: How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics and Culture 44(2), 13-25.
• Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (2005). Framing american politics. University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Caldarelli, G., Chessa, A., Pammolli, F., Pompa, G., & Puliga, M., (2014). A multi-level geographical study of Italian political elections from twitter data. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e95809. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095809
• Cappella, J. N. & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. U.K: Oxford University Press.
• Castells, M. (2001) La galaxia Internet. Reflexiones sobre Internet, empresa y sociedad. Madrid: Areté.
• Castells, M. (2010). Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza.
• Castells, M. (2012). Redes de esperanza y de indignación. Los movimientos sociales en la era de Internet. Madrid: Alianza.
• Cheong, P., & Lundry, C. (2012). Prosumption, Transmediation, and Resistance: Terrorism and Man-hunting in Southeast Asia. American Behavioral Scientist 56(4), 488-510. doi:10.1177/0002764211429365
• Coleman, S. & Freelon, D. (2015). Handbook of Digital Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Congosto, M. (2014). Viralidad de los mensajes en Twitter en las Campañas Electorales. Retrieved from: http://www.alice-comunicacionpolitica.com/files/ponencias/456- F542a8ea14561412075169-ponencia-1.pdf
• Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on twitter. ICWSM, 133, 89-96.
• Criado, J. I., Martínez-Fuentes, G., & Silván, A. (2012). Social media for political campaigning. The use of twitter by Spanish mayors in 2011 local elections. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance (pp. 219-232). Nueva York: Springer.
• Dang-Xuan, L. et al. (2013): “An investigation of influential and the role of sentiment in political communication on Twitter during election periods”. Information, Communication & Society 16 (5), pp. 795-825.
• d´Heer, E., & Verdegem, P. (2014). Conversations about the elections on Twitter: Towards a structural understanding of Twitter's relation with the political and the media field. European Journal of Communication 29(6), 720-734. doi:10.1177/0267323114544866
• d’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: a response to Entman. Journal of Communication 52(4), 870–888. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x
• de Vreese, C. (2004). The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81(1), 36-52.
• de Vreese, C. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information design journal 13(1), 51–62. doi:10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
• de Vreese, C. (2012). New Avenues for Framing Research. American Behavioral Scientist 56(3), 365-375. doi: 10.1177/0002764211426331
• de Vreese, C., & Lecheler, S. (2012). News framing research: An overview and new developments. In H. Semetko, & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication. (pp. 292-307). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446201015.n24
• Deltell, L., Osteso, J-M & Claes, F. (2013). “Predicción de tendencia política por Twitter: Elecciones andaluzas 2012”, en Ámbitos, Revista Internacional de Comunicación 22, Retrieved from http://ambitoscomunicacion.com/2013/prediccion-de-tendencia-politica-por-twitter-elecciones-andaluzas-2012/ (1-feb-2013)
• Dimitrova, D. V. & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Election news in Sweden and the United States: a comparative study of sources and media frames. Journalism 13 (5), 604-619.
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbo, E. (2013). Personalized-campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter y Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication and Society 16(5), 757-774. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330.
• Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4), 51-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
• Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication 20, 415–432.
• Entman, R. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Farhi, P (2009). The Twitter explosion. American Journalism Review 31(3), 26-31.
• Foot, K. & Schneider, S. M. (2006). Web campaigning (acting with technology). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. The American Journal of Sociology 95(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1086/229213
• Giansante, G. (2015) Online Political Communication. How to Use the Web to Build Consensus and Boost Participation. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-17617-8
• Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline? The Journal of Politics 75(3), 701-716. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
• Grant, W. J., Moon B., & Grant, J. B. (2010). Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians’ use of the Social Network Tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science 45(4), 1-37. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2010.517176
• Gutierrez-Rubí, A. (2011). La política vigilada. La comunicación política en la era de Wikileaks. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
• Harfoush, R. (2010). Yes we did. Cómo construimos la marca Obama a través de las redes sociales. Planeta: Barcelona.
• Hendricks, J. A., & Denton, R. E. (Eds.) (2010). Communicator-in-chief. How Barack Obama used new media technology to win the White House. Lexington Books: Lanham.
• Hendricks, J. A., & Frye, J. K. (2011). “Social Media and the Millennial Generation in the 2010 Midterm Election.” In H.S.N. & J. A. Hendricks (Eds.). Social Media: Usage and Impact. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
• Hemphill, L., Culotta, A., & Heston, M. (2014). Framing in Social Media: How the U.S Congress uses Twitter hashtags to frame political issues. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2317335
• Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J., & Shapiro, M. A. (2013). What’s Congress doing on Twitter? In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 877-886). San Antonio, Texas, USA: ACM.
• Hendricks, J. A., & Kayd, L. L. (Eds.) (2011). Techno politics in presidential campaigning. New York: Routledge.
• Hoffman, L. H. (2012). Participation or Communication? An Explanation of Political Activity in the Internet Age. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9(3), 217-233. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2011.650929
• Holotescu, C., Gutu, D., Grosseck, G., & Bran, R. (2011). Microblogging meets politics. The influence of communication in 140 characters on Romanian presidential elections in 2009. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations 13(1), 37-47.
• Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. (2009) Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proc. HICSS ‘09. IEEE Press.
• Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2012). Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: the use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 455-461. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004 . SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2323214
• Howard, P. N. (2006). New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/19/3/477
• Innerarity, D. (2011). Los límites de la transparencia. El País, 22 de febrero de 2011.
• Izquierdo Labella, L. (2012). “Las redes sociales en la política española: Twitter en las elecciones de 2011”.Estudos em Comunicação, Maio 2012, 11, 139-153. Covilhã: Universidade da Beira Interior. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://www.ec.ubi.pt/ec/11/pdf/EC11-2012Mai-07.pdf
• Jungherr, A. (2010, abril). Twitter in politics. Lessons learned during the German superwahljahr 2009. Paper presented at the Workshop on Microblogging at the CHI 2010, Atlanta (USA). http://andreasjungherr.net/2010/04/10/twitter-in-politics-lessons-learned-duringthe-german-superwahljahr-2009/
• Jungherr, A. (2014). The logic of political coverage on twitter: temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication 64, 239–259. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12087
• Kiousis, S., Kim, S., & McDevitt, M. (2009). Competing for attention: information subsidy influence in agenda building during election campaigns. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86(3) 545–562. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600306
• Kiousis, S., Laskin, A., & Kim, J.Y. (2011). Congressional agenda-building: examining the influence of congressional communications from the speaker of the House. Public Relations Journal 5(1) 1–14.
• Kiousis, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2010). The White House and public relations: examining the linkages between presidential communications and public opinion. Public Relations Review 36(1) 7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.08.013
• Kruikemeier, S., Van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication 28(1), 53-56. doi: 10.1177/0267323112464837
• Kruikemeier, S. (2014): “How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes”. Computers in Human Behavior 34, 131-139.
• Lancendorfer, K. M., & Lee, B. (2010). Who influences whom? The agenda-building relationship between political candidates and the media in the 2002 Michigan governor’s race. Journal of Political Marketing 9(3), 186–206. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2010.497737
• Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2011). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society 14(5), 729-747. doi:10.1177/1461444811422894
• Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2013). Representation or Participation? Twitter use during the 2011 Danish Election Campaign. Javnost-The Public 20(1), 71-88. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2013.11009109
• Lieber, P. S., & Golan, G. J. (2011). Political public relations, news management, and agenda indexing. In J. Stromback & S. Kiousis (Eds), Political Public Relations: Principles and Applications (pp. 54-74). New York: Routledge.
• Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2013). Online political communication strategies: MEPs, E-Representation, and Self-Representation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 10(2), 190-207. doi: 10.1080/19331681 .2012.758071
• López-García, G. (2016) ‘Nuevos’ y ‘viejos’ liderazgos: la campaña de las elecciones generales españolas de 2015 en Twitter. Communication & Society 29 (3), 149-167
• López Garcia, G., Lara, T. & Sánchez Duarte, J. M. (2011). Los weblogs como mecanismos de reafirmación ideológica. La blogosfera española ante las elecciones generales de 2008, in SAMPEDRO, Víctor (ed.), Cibercampaña, cauces y diques para la participación. Las elecciones generales de 2008 y su proyección tecnopolítica. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
• López-Rabadán, P. (2010). Nuevas vías para el estudio del framing periodístico. La noción de estrategia de encuadre. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico 16, 235-258. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESMP/article/view/ESMP1010110235A
• Marín, J., & Zamora, R. (2014). Aproximación integradora en la investigación sobre la teoría del framing desde su condición multiparadigmática. Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación Social “Disertaciones” 7(1), Artículo 1. http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/Disertaciones/
• Marland, A. (2012). Political photography, journalism, and framing in the digital age. International Journal of Press-Politics, 17(2), 214–233. doi: 10.1177/1940161211433838
• Matthes, J. (2009). What's in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86(2), 349-367. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600206
• Matthes, J. (2012). Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist 56(3), 247-259. doi: 10.1177/0002764211426324
• Mcnair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication. Nueva York: Routledge.
• Medvic, S. K. (2011). Campaign management and organization. The use and impact of information and communication technology. In S. K. Medvic (Ed), New Directions in Campaigns and Elections (pp. 59-78). New York: Routledge.
• Naaman, Mor, Boase, Jeffery, and Lai, Chih-Hui. (2010). Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams. Proceedings of CSCW-2010. Savannah, Georgia February 6-10 (conference paper).
• Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle. Political Communications in PostIndustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• O'Reilly, T. & Milstein, S. (2009). The Twitter Book. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
• O’Connor, R. (2009). Facebook and Twitter are reshaping journalism as we know it. AlterNet, 20 January. http://www.alternet.org/media/121211?page=1
• Panagopoulos, C. (2009). Technology and the Modern Political Campaign: The Digital Pulse of the 2008 Campaigns. In C. Panagopoulos (Ed.), Politicking Online: The Transformation of Election Campaigns Communication (pp. 1-17). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Parmelee, J. H. (2003). Meet the cadidates videos: Analyzing presidential primary primary campaign videocassettes. Grennwood Publishing Group.
• Parmelee, J. H. (2006). Understanding Symbolism in Magazine Coverage of President Reagan, Florida Communication Journal 34(2), 54-69.
• Parmelee, J. H. (2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society 16(3) 434-450. doi: 10.1177/1461444813487955
• Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham: Lexington Books.
• Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter revolution. How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham: Lexington Books.
• Patterson, T.E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Vintage.
• Pearson, S., & O’Connell, F. (2010). Avoiding Social Media Pitfalls. Politics (Campaigns & Elections) 31(294), 43.
• Quevedo Redondo, R., Portalés-Oliva, M., & Berrocal Gonzalo, S. (2016): “El uso de la imagen en Twitter durante la campaña electoral municipal de 2015 en España”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 71, 85 a 107.
• Ragas, M. W., & Kiousis, S. (2010). Intermedia agenda-setting and political activism: MoveOn.org and the 2008 presidential election. Mass Communication and Society 13(5), 560–583. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.515372
• Reese, S. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication 57(1), 148–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x.
• Ritzer, G., Dean, P., & Jurgenson, N. (2012). The Coming of Age of the Prosumer. American Behavioral Scientist 56(4), 379–398. doi: 10.1177/0002764211429368
• Rodríguez, R., & Ureña, D. (2012). Diez razones para el uso de Twitter como herramienta en la comunicación política y electoral. Comunicación y Pluralismo 5, 89-115.
• Sádaba, T., Rodriguez-Virgili, J., & Bartolomé, M. (2012). Propuesta de sistematización de la teoría del framing para el estudio y praxis de la comunicación política, Observatorio (OBS*) Journal 6(2), 109-126.
• Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication 49(1), 103–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
• Scheufele, D., & Iyengar, S. (2013). The state of framing research: a call for new directions. In K. Kenski, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Theories. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.SYP33-65.pafp
• Schlozman, K., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the strong. Participatory inequality and the Internet. Perspectives on Politics 8, 487-509. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710001210
• Schweitzer, E. J. (2012). The Mediatization of E-Campaining: Evidence from German Party websites in State, National, and European Parliamentary Elections 2002-2009. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 283-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01577.x
• Segado-Boj, F., Díaz-Campo, J., & Lloves-Sobrado, B. (2015): “Líderes latinoamericanos en Twitter. Viejas costumbres para nuevos medios en tiempos de crisis políticas”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 70, 156-173. doi: 10.4185/RLCS-2015-1040
• Sheffer, M. L., & Schultz, B. (2010). Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sport journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication 3(4), 472–484. doi: 10.1177/2167479514527432
• Small, T. A. (2012, julio). The Not-So Social Network: The Use of Twitter by Canada’s Party Leaders. Paper submitted to the XXIInd World Congress of Political Science, Madrid, España.
• Solop, F. I. (2009). "RT @BarackObama we just made history: Twitter and the 2008 Presidential election" In J. A. Hendricks & R. E. Denton (Eds.), Communicator-in-Chief: A Look at How Barack Obama used New Media Technology to Win the White House (pp. 37–50). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
• Trammell, K. D., Williams, A. P., Postelnicu, M., & Landreville, K. D. (2006). Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate Web sites and blogs through text and technical features. Mass Communication & Society 9(1), 21-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0901_2
• Vaccari, C. (2008). From the air to the ground. The Internet in the 2004 US presidential campaign. New Media & Society 10(4), 647-665. doi: 10.1177/1461444808093735
• Valera, L. (2013). ¿Deliberación 2.0 o radicalización de la retórica partidista? Un análisis de las discusiones políticas en los muros de Facebook de candidatos políticos españoles. Textual and Visual Media 5, 139-168.
• Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication 20. 485-508.
• Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing. Bridging culture back in. Journal of Communication 57, 60-78.
• Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategic to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In P. D´Angelo & J. Kuypers (eds.) Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theroretical perspectives. London: Routledge.
• Vergeer, M. (2012). Politics, elections and online campaigning: Past, present… and a peek into the future. New Media and Society 15(1), 9-17. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457327
• Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: micro-blogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18(4), 399-419. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12023
• Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2013). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning. The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style”. Party Politics 19 (3), 477-501 doi:10.1177/1354068811407580
• Vliegenthart, R. (2012). Framing in Mass Communication Research–An Overview and Assessment. Sociology Compass 6(12), 937–948. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12003
• Vliegenthart, R., & Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication 26(2), 101-115. doi: 10.1177/0267323111404838
• Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., & Puschmann, C. (Eds.) (2013). Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang.
• Wigley, S., & Fontenot, M. (2009). Where media turn during crises: a look at information subsidies and the Virginia Tech shootings. Electronic News 3(2): 94–108.
• Williams, B. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After Broadcast News. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Yardi, S., & Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30(5), 316-327. doi: 10.1177/0270467610380011
• Zamora, R., & Zurutuza, C. (2014). Campaigning on Twitter: Towards the “Personal Style” Campaign to Activate the Political Engagement During the 2011 Spanish General Elections. Communicación y Sociedad. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
• Zamora, R. (2015) Los usos políticos de Twitter como herramienta para enmarcar los relatos políticos: retos y oportunidades. In C. Muñiz, & J. de D. Martínez, Discursos mediáticos en contextos electorales, México: Tendencias. Universidad Autónoma Nuevo León.