Escala de Desarrollo Armónicoun estudio de validación

  1. Francisco J. Abellán
  2. María T. Calvo-Llena
  3. Rafael Rabadán
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 34

Número: 1

Páginas: 77-85

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

This paper gathers firstly, the study of psychometric validation of the Scale of Harmonic Development (SHD) (Abellán, 2011). 218 children between the ages of 0-12 years were participated in the study. The exploratory factorial analysis showed the one-dimensional nature of the scale as a whole and all its subscales; as well as the internal consistency of the measurements and the adequacy of the items, revealing the scale’s usefulness as a screening test for prevention of children’s development. Secondly, a first approach to the scale’s validation process is presented in this dissertation, for which another 67 six-year-old children were evaluated. The concurrent validation with the scales IDB (Fundació Catalana per a la Síndrome de Down, 1998) and BLOC Screening (Puyuelo, Renom, Selanas & Wiig, 2002) conducted through analysis of correlations provided contradictory data that will be contrasted in future studies with a broader sample

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abellán, F. J. (2011). Escala de desarrollo armónico: un estudio de validación estructural [Scale of Harmonic Development: a estructural validation]. Doctoral dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Murcia. Retrieved from http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/109212
  • Abellán, F. J., Calvo-Llena, M. T., & Rabadán, R. (2015). Escala de desarrollo armónico. Una propuesta integradora para la evaluación del desarrollo infantil [Harmonic Scale of Development. A proposal of integration by which to assess child development]. Anales de Psicología, 31(3), 837-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.3.199901
  • Bayley, N. (1977). Escalas Bayley de desarrollo infantil [Bayley scales of child development]. Madrid: TEA.
  • Bluma, S.M., Shearer, M. S., Frohman, A. H., & Hilliard, J. M. (1995). Guía Portage de educación preescolar [Portage guide of preschool education]. Madrid: PSYMTEC.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Traducción castellana: La ecología del desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós, 1987).
  • Cordero, A., Seisdedos, N., De la Cruz, M. V., & González, M. (1996). Escalas McCarthy de aptitudes y psicomotricidad para niños [McCarthy scales of skills and psychomotricity for children]. Madrid: TEA.
  • Crocker, L. y Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart y Winston.
  • Cuervo, A. y Ávila, A. M. (2010). Neuropsicología infantil del desarrollo: Detección e intervención de trastornos en la infancia [Infant neuropsicology of development: detection and intervention of disorders in infants]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología: Ciencia y Tecnología, 3(2), 59-68. Retrieved from http://revistas.iberoamericana.edu.co/index.php/ripsicologia/article/view/203
  • DeRobertis, E. M. (2011). Existential-humanistic and dynamic systems approaches to child development in mutual encounter. The Humanistic Psychologist, 39, 3-23. doi: 10.1080/08873267.2011.539934
  • Doll, E. A. (1965). Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • DuBose, R. F., & Langley, M. B. (1977). Developmental Activities Screening Inventory. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources Corporation.
  • Fernández, E. (1991). Escala Haizea-Llevant. Tabla de desarrollo de 0 a 5 años [Haizea-Llevant scale. Development table 0-5 years]. Vitoria: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.
  • Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (2014). Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Frankenburg, W., Dodds, J., Archer, P., Shapiro, H., & Bresnick, M. (1992). The Denver- II: A major revision and restandarization of de Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics, 89(1), 91-97.
  • Fundació Catalana per a la Síndrome de Down (1989). Inventario de Desarrollo Battelle [Battelle Developmental Inventory]. Barcelona: FCSD.
  • García, J. E., Arribas, D., & Uriel, E. J. (2006). BTI, Batería TEA Inicial [Initial TEA battery]. Madrid: TEA.
  • Gessell, A. L. (1925). The mental growth of the preschool child: A psychological outline of normal development from birth to the sixth year including a system of developmental diagnosis. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • García-Tornel, S., Ruiz, A., Reuter, J., Clow, C., & Reuter, L. (1997). Normalización de la Escala de Desarrollo Infantil de Kent. Implicaciones para la práctica pediátrica ambulatoria [Normalization of the Kent Scale of Infant development. Implications for pediatric ambulatory practice]. Anales Españoles de Pediatría, 46, 172-176.
  • Guralnick, M. J. (2001). A Developmental Systems Model for early Intervention. Infants and Young Children, 14(2), 1-18.
  • Ireton, H. R., & Thwing, E. J. (1988). Child Development Inventory, CDI. Minneapolis, MN: Behaviour Science Systems, Inc.
  • Josse, D. (1997). Brunet-Lézine revisado. Escala de desarrollo psicomotor de la primera infancia [Brunet-Lézine R. Scale of first infancy psychomotor development]. Madrid: PSYMTEC.
  • López-Pina, J. A. (2005). CLM-1 y RM-1: dos programas para el análisis de tests psicométricos [CLM-1 and RM-1: two programs for the analysis of psychometrical tests]. Psicothema, 17(3), 536-537.
  • Millá, M. G. (2016). Armonización del desarrollo de la prematuridad y el bajo peso al nacer mediante programas de Atención Temprana: desde el nacimiento hasta los tres años [Harmonization of development of prematurity and low weight when born through Early Intervention programs: from birth to the age of three]. Doctoral dissertation. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Murcia. Retrevied from: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/49341
  • Newborg, J., Stock, J. R., & Wnek, L. (1984). Battelle Developmental Inventory. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • Prieto, G., & Muñiz, J. (2000). Un modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España [A model to evaluate the quality of the tests used in Spain]. Papeles del psicólogo, 77, 65-71.
  • Puyuelo, M., Renom, J., Solanas, A., & Wiig, E. H. (2002). Evaluación del lenguaje: BLOC Screening [Language assessment: BLOC Screening]. Barcelona: MASSON.
  • Sameroff, A. J. (1982). Development and the dialectics: the need for a systems approach. In W. A. Collins (Ed.). Minnea Symposium on Child Psychology, vol 15. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA
  • Secadas, F. (1992). Procesos evolutivos y escala observacional del desarrollo [Developmental processes and observational scale of development]. Madrid: TEA.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. Simon & G. Haldford (Eds.) Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modelling (pp. 31-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Smith, L.B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 343-348.
  • Spencer, J.P., & Thelen, E. (2003). Connectionism and dynamic systems theory: Are these really different approaches to development? Developmental Science, 6, 375-447 (Número especial).
  • Thelen, E. (1992). Development as a dynamic system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(6), 189-193. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770402
  • Thelen, E. (1995). Time-scale dynamics and the development of an embodied cognition. In R. F. Port & T. Van Gelder, (Eds.). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thelen, E., & Bates, E.A. (2003). Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? Developmental Science, 6, 378-391.
  • Uzgiris, I. C., & Hunt, J. McV. (1975). Assessment in Infancy: Ordinal Scales of Psychological Development. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Waller, N. G. (2001). MicroFACT 2.0: A microcomputer factor analysis program for ordered polytomous data and mainframe size problems. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet