Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings managementevidence from Spain

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Ali, A., Hwang, L., Country-specific factors related to financial reporting and the value relevance of accounting data. J. Account. Res. 38 (2000), 1–23.
• Angelidis, J.P., Massetti, B.L., Magee-Egan, P., Does corporate social responsibility orientation vary by position in the organizational hierarchy?. Rev. Bus. 28:3 (2008), 23–32.
• Aras, G., Aybars, A., Kutlu, O., Managing corporate performance. Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manage. 59:3 (2010), 229–254.
• Ashbaugh, H., Non-U.S. firms’ accounting standard choices. J. Account. Public Policy 20:2 (2001), 129–153.
• Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., Hatfield, J., An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad. Manage. J. 28:2 (1985), 446–463.
• Ball, R., Kothari, S., Robin, A., The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. J. Account. Econ. 29:1 (2000), 1–51.
• Ball, R., Robin, A., Wu, J.S., Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. J. Account. Econ. 36:1–3 (2003), 235–270.
• Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R., Lang, M., Williams, C., Accounting Quality: International Accounting Standards and US GAAP. 2006, Working Paper, Stanford University, University of North Carolina.
• Beneish, M.D., Press, E., The resolution of technical default. Account. Rev. 70 (1995), 337–354.
• Brammer, S., Millington, A., Rayton, B., The contribution of corporation social responsibility to organizational commitment. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 18:10 (2007), 1701–1719.
• Brine, M., Brown, R., Hackett, G., Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in the Australian Context. 2006, Australian Treasury.
• Bowen, R., Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., Accounting discretion, corporate governance, and firm performance. Contemp. Account. Res. 25:2 (2008), 351–405.
• Bukit, R.B., Iskandar, T.M., Surplus free cash flow, earnings management and audit committee. Int. J. Econ. Manag. 3:1 (2009), 204–223.
• Castelo, M., Lima, L., Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. J. Bus. Ethics 69 (2006), 111–132.
• Chih, H.L., Shen, C.H., Kang, F.C., Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and earnings management: some international evidence. J. Bus. Ethics 79 (2008), 179–198.
• Choi, B.B., Lee, D., Park, Y., Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance and earnings quality: evidence from Korea. Corp. Gov.: Int. Rev. 21:5 (2013), 447–467.
• Choi, T.H., Pae, J., Business ethics and financial reporting quality: evidence from Korea. J. Bus. Ethics 103 (2001), 403–427.
• Christie, A.A., Zimmerman, Efficient and opportunistic choices of accounting procedures. Corporate control contest. Account. Rev. 69:4 (1994), 539–566.
• Chung, R., Firth, M., Kim, J.-B., Earnings management, surplus free cash flow, and external monitoring. J. Bus. Res. 58 (2005), 766–776.
• Coombs, J.E., Gilley, K.M., Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strat. Manage. J. 26:9 (2005), 827–841.
• DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., Skinner, D.J., Accounting choice in troubled companies. J. Account. Econ. 17:1–2 (1994), 113–143.
• Dechow, P., Sloan, R., Sweeney, A.P., Detecting earnings management. Account. Rev. 70:2 (1995), 193–225.
• Dechow, P., Sloan, R., Sweeney, A.P., Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemp. Account. Res. 13:1 (1996), 1–36.
• Dechow, P., Richardson, S., Tuna, I., Why are earnings kinky? An examination of the earnings management explanation. Rev. Account. Stud. 8:2 (2003), 355–384.
• Dechow, P.M., Ge, W., The persistence of earnings and cash flows and the role of special items: implications for the accrual anomaly. Rev. Account. Stud. 11 (2006), 253–296.
• DeFond, M.L., Jiambalvo, J., Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. J. Account. Econ. 17:1–2 (1994), 145–176.
• Dichev, I.D., Skinner, D.J., Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. J. Account. Res. 40:4 (2002), 1091–1123.
• Doh, J.P., Bunyaratavej, K., Hahn, E., Separable but not equal: the location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 40:6 (2009), 926–943.
• Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E., The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20 (1995), 701–711.
• Donaldson, L., Making stakeholder theory whole. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24:2 (1999), 237–241.
• Freeman, E., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. 1984, Pitman, Boston.
• Gabrielsen, G., Gramlich, J., Plenborg, T., Managerial ownership, information content of earnings, and discretionary accruals in a non-US setting. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 29 (2002), 967–988.
• Gelb, D.S., Strawser, J.A., Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosure: an alternative explanation for increased disclosure. J. Bus. Ethics 33 (2001), 1–13.
• Griffin, J.J., Mahon, J.F., The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. 36 (1997), 5–31.
• Healy, P.M., Wahlen, J.M., A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Account. Horiz. 13 (1999), 365–383.
• Hillman, A.J., Keim, G.D., Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?. Strat. Manage. J. 22:2 (2001), 125–139.
• Hong, Y., Andersen, M.L., The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: an exploratory study. J. Bus. Ethics 104 (2011), 461–471.
• Jawahar, I.M., McLaughlin, G.L., Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26 (2001), 397–414.
• Jensen, M.C., Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 76 (1986), 323–329.
• Jensen, M.C., Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 5 (1989), 61–74.
• Jones, J., Earnings management during import relief investigations. J. Account. Res. 29:2 (1991), 193–228.
• Jones, T.M., Wicks, A.C., Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24:2 (1999), 206–221.
• Jones, K., Krishnan, G., Melendrez, K., Do models of discretionary accruals detect actual cases of fraudulent and restated earnings? An empirical analysis. Contemp. Account. Res. 25:2 (2008), 499–531.
• Jorgensen, A., Knudsen, J.S., Sustainable competitiveness in global value chains. How do small Danish firms behave?. Corp. Gov. 6:special issue (2006), 449–462.
• Klein, A., Audit Committee, Board of Director characteristics, and earnings management. J. Account. Econ. 33 (2002), 375–400.
• Kotari, S.P., Leone, A.J., Wasley, C.E., Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. J. Account. Econ. 39 (2005), 163–197.
• La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., Law and finance. J. Financ. 52 (1997), 1131–1150.
• La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Corporate ownership around the world. J. Financ. 54 (1999), 471–517.
• Labelle, R., Gargouri, R.M., Francoeur, C., Ethics, diversity management and financial reporting quality. J. Bus. Ethics 93 (2010), 335–353.
• Lang, L.H.P., Stulz, R.M., Wlaking, R.A., A test of the free cash flow hypothesis, the case of bidder returns. J. Financ. Econ. 29 (1991), 315–335.
• Lang, M., Lins, K.V., Miller, D.P., ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: does cross listing in the United States improve a firm's information environment and increase market value?. J. Account. Res. 41:2 (2003), 317–345.
• Lang, M., Smith Raedy, J., Wilson, W., Earnings management and cross listing: are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings?. J. Account. Econ. 42:1–2 (2006), 255–283.
• Larcker, D.F., Richardson, S.A., Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. J. Account. Res. 42 (2004), 625–658.
• Lehn, K., Poulsen, A., Free cash flow and stakeholder gains in going private transactions. J. Financ. 44:3 (1989), 771–787.
• Leuz, C., Nanda, D., Wysocki, P.D., Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. J. Financ. Econ. 69:5 (2003), 505–527.
• Liberty, S., Zimmerman, J.L., Labor union contract negotiations and accounting choices. Account. Rev. 61:4 (1986), 692–712.
• Mahoney, L., Roberts, R.W., Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Account. Forum 31:3 (2007), 233–253.
• Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A., Walsh, J.P., Does it pay to be good…and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. 2009, Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 10.2139/ssrn.1866371 Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866371.
• Maron, I.Y., Toward a unified theory of the CSP-CFP link. J. Bus. Ethics 67:2 (2006), 191–200.
• McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., Schneeweis, T., Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad. Manage. J. 31:4 (1988), 854–872.
• McNichols, M., Research design issues in earnings management studies. J. Account. Public Policy 19:4-5 (2000), 313–345.
• McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strat. Manage. J. 21 (2000), 603–609.
• McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26:1 (2001), 117–127.
• Merco, El proceso de elaboración de Merco España. Monitor Empresarial de Reputación Corporativa. 2013 http://www.merco.info/datafiles/0000/4004/El_proceso_de_elaboracion_de_Merco_2013.pdf.
• Moore, G., Corporate social and financial performance: an investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. J. Bus. Ethics 34 (2001), 299–315.
• Neville, B.A., Bell, S.J., Mengüç, B., Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance–financial performance relationship. Eur. J. Mark. 39:9–10 (2005), 1184–1198.
• Orlitzky, M., Benjamin, J.D., Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analysis review. Bus. Soc. 40:4 (2001), 369–387.
• Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., Rynes, S.L., Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24 (2003), 403–441.
• Pagano, M., Röell, A., Zehner, J., The geography of equity listing: why do companies list abroad?. J. Financ. 57:6 (2002), 2651–2694.
• Park, S., Lee, S., Financial rewards for social responsibility. Cornell Hosp. Q. 50:2 (2009), 168–179.
• Park, Y.W., Shin, H.H., Board composition and earnings management in Canada. J. Corp. Financ. 10 (2004), 431–457.
• Pesqueux, Y., Damak-Ayadi, S., Stakeholder theory in perspective. Corp. Gov. 5:2 (2005), 5–21.
• Petersen, M.A., Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev. Financ. Stud. 22:1 (2009), 435–480.
• Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., Gallego-Alvarez, I., Garcia-Sanchez, I.M., Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Social responsability in Spain. Practices and motivations in firms. Manage. Decis. 46:8 (2008), 1247–1271.
• Press, E., Weintrop, J., Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements: their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice. J. Account. Econ. 12 (1990), 65–95.
• Prior, D., Surroca, J., Tribo, J.A., Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corp. Gov. 16:3 (2008), 160–176.
• Reynolds, J.K., Francis, J., Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. J. Account. Econ. 30:3 (2000), 375–400.
• Roberts, R.W., Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory. Account. Organ. Soc. 17 (1992), 595–612.
• Rodgers, W., Choy, H.L., Guiral, A., Do investors value a firm's commitment to social activities?. J. Bus. Ethics 114:4 (2013), 607–623.
• Shen, C.H., Chih, H.L., Investor protection, prospect theory, and earnings management: an international comparison of the banking industry. J. Bank. Financ. 29 (2005), 2675–2697.
• Shleifer, A., Visny, R.W., Management entrenchment, the case of manager-specific investment. J. Financ. Econ. 25 (1989), 123–139.
• Shleifer, A., Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior? Working Paper. 2004, Harvard University.
• Simpson, W., Kohers, T., The link between social and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. J. Bus. Ethics 35 (2002), 97–109.
• Sweeney, A.P., Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. J. Account. Econ. 17:3 (1994), 281–308.
• Tarca, A., International convergence of accounting practices: choosing between IAS and U.S. GAAP. J. Int. Financ. Manage. Account. 15:1 (2004), 60–91.
• Ullman, A.E., Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance of US firms. Acad. Manage. Rev. 10 (1985), 540–557.
• Van Tendeloo, B., Vanstraelen, A., Earnings management under German GAAP versus IFRS. Eur. Account. Rev. 14:1 (2005), 155–180.
• Vander Bauwhede, H., Earnings Management in a Non-Anglo-Saxon Environment: The Impact of Audit Quality, Public Ownership and Stakeholders. 2001, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven.
• Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B., The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strat. Manage. J. 18 (1997), 303–319.
• Warfield, T., Wild, J., Wild, K., Managerial ownership, accounting choices and informativeness of earnings. J. Account. Econ. 20 (1995), 61–91.
• Watts, R., Zimmerman, J., Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Account. Rev. 53:1 (1978), 112–134.
• Watts, R., Zimmerman, J., Positive Accounting Theory. 1986, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
• Watts, R., Zimmerman, J., Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective. Account. Rev. 65:1 (1990), 131–156.
• Wu, M.L., Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Acad. Bus. 8:1 (2006), 163–171.
• Yeo, G.H.H., Tan, P., Ho, K.W., Chen, S.S., Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of earnings. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 29 (2002), 1023–1046.
• Young, S., Systematic measurement error in the estimation of discretionary accruals: an evaluation of alternative modelling procedures. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 26:7-8 (1999), 833–862.
• Zahra, S.A., Priem, R.L., Rasheed, A.A., The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. J. Manage. 31 (2005), 803–828.
• Zimmerman, J.L., Taxes and firm size. J. Account. Econ. 5:2 (1983), 119–149.