Las creencias de estudiantes universitarios sobre la escritura en Inglés

  1. Nicolás Conesa, Florentina 1
  2. Manchón Ruiz, Rosa María 2
  3. Roca de Larios, Julio 2
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena

    Cartagena, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02k5kx966

  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Educatio siglo XXI: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1989-466X,  1699-2105

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 34

Número: 1

Páginas: 51-70

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/J/252531 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Educatio siglo XXI: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Resumen

Este estudio investiga las creencias de estudiantes sobre varios aspectos de la composición en un contexto de lengua extranjera. Los participantes eran dos grupos de estudiantes universitarios de inglés con diferente cantidad y tipo de experiencias escritora e instrucción. Los datos provenían de un cuestionario completado por los estudiantes y una entrevista con la profesora de escritura.Los resultados indican la existencia de creencias bien fundamentadas sobre el potencial de aprendizaje de la escritura en L2, la dimensión estratégica de la escritura y los procesos de retroalimentación. Otras creencias relacionadas con la dimensión personal de la escritura demostraron ser dependientes del contexto de instrucción. Las implicaciones pedagógicas son discutidas.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

The research reported in this paper is part of a progamme of research financed by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (research grant FF12012-35839) and by Fundación Séneca, the research agency of the autonomous Government of the region of Murcia, Spain (research Grant 19463/PI/14)

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bandura, A. (2001). “Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective”, in Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26
  • Barcelos, A.M.F. (2003). “Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review”, in P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (eds.), Beliefs about SLA. New Research Approaches. New York: Springer, 7-33.
  • Chamot, A.U. (2005). “The cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA): An update”, in P.A. Richard-Amato & M.A. Snow (eds.), Academic Success for English Language Learners: Strategies for K-12 Subject Content Teachers. New York: Longman, 87-101.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ezer, H., & Sivan, T. (2005). “Good academic writing in Hebrew: The perceptions of preservice teachers and their instructors”, in Assessing Writing, 10, 2: 117-133.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry”, in American Psychologist, 34, 10: 906-911.
  • Ford, M. (1992). Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs. Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Gan, Z. (2004). “Attitudes and strategies as predictors of self-directed language learning in an EFL context”, in International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 3: 390-411.
  • Gardner, R. (2006). “The socio-educational model of second language acquisition: a research paradigm”, in EUROSLA Yearbook, 6, 237-260.
  • Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). “Rethinking context: An introduction”, in A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-42.
  • Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). “The four-phase model of interest development”, in Educational Psychologist, 41, 2: 111-127
  • Hofer, B.K., Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), (2002). Personal Epistemology. The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Horwitz, E.K. (1988). “The beliefs about language learning of beginning foreign language students”, in The Modern Language Journal, 72, 3: 283-294.
  • Hosenfeld, C. (2003) “Evidence of emergent beliefs of a second language learner”. In P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (eds.), Beliefs About SLA: New Research Approaches. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 37-54.
  • Leki, I. (1995). “Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum”, in TESOL Quarterly, 29, 2: 235-260.
  • Manchón, R.M. (2009). “Individual differences in foreign language learning: The dynamics of beliefs about L2 writing” in Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 245-268.
  • Manchón, R.M. (Ed.), (2011). Learning to Write and Writing to Learn in an Additional Language. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Manchón, R.M., Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). “Investigating beliefs about writing and composing strategy implementation. The effect of instruction and practice”, in M. Conrick & M. Howard (eds.), From Applied Linguistics to Linguistics Applied: Issues, Practices, Trends. London: BAAL, 76-90.
  • Manchón, R.M. & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). “On the temporal nature of planning in L1 and L2 composing: A study of foreign language writers”, in Language Learning, 57, 4: 549-593.
  • Manchón, R.M.,& Roca de Larios, J. (2011). “Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing”, in R.M. Manchón (ed.), Learning-to-Write and Writing-to-Learn in an Additional Language. amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 181-207.
  • Mori, Y. (1999a). “Beliefs about language learning and their relationship to the ability to integrate information from word parts and contexts in interpreting novel Kanji words”, in The Modern Language Journal, 99, 534-547.
  • Mori, Y. (1999b). “Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning?”, in Language Learning, 49, 3: 377-415.
  • Newell, G.E. (2005). “Writing to learn: How alternative theories of school writing account for student performance”, in C.A.MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald, (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Publications, 235-247.
  • Newell, G.E., Koukis, S., & Boster, S. (2006). “Best practices in writing to learn”, in C.A. MacArthur, S.Graham, & J. Fitzgerald, (eds.), Best Practices in Writing Instruction. New York: Guilford Publications.
  • O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ortega, L. (2009). “Studying writing across EFL contexts: Looking back and moving forward”, in R.M. Manchón (ed.), Writing in Foreign Language Contexts: Learning, Teaching, and Research. UK: Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 232-255.
  • Ortega, L. (2012). “Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing-SLA interfaces” in Journal of Second Language Writing, 21,4: 404-415.
  • Ortega, L., & Carson, J. G. (2010). “Multicompetence, social context, and L2 writing research praxis”, in T. Silva & P. Matsuda (eds.), Practicing Theory in Second Language Writing. West Lafayette: Parlor Press, 48-71.
  • Pajares, F. (2003). “Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature”, in Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 2: 139-158.
  • Petric, B., Czarl, B. (2003). “Validating a writing strategy questionnaire” in System, 31, 2: 187-215.
  • Sasaki, M. (2009). “Changes in EFL students’ writing over 3.5 years: A socio-cognitive account”, in R. M. Manchón (ed.), Learning, Teaching, and Researching Writing in Foreign Language Contexts. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, 49-76.
  • Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). “Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research”, in K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 183212.
  • Schommer, M. (1990). “Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge in comprehension” in Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 3: 498-504.
  • Sengupta, S. (2000). “An investigation into the effects of revision strategy instruction on L2 secondary school learners”, in System, 28, 1: 97-113.
  • Swain, M. (1995). “Three functions of output in second language learning” in G. Cook & B.Seidlhofer (eds.), Principles and Practice in the Study of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1987). “Incorporating learner training in the classroom”, in A. Wenden, & J. Rubin (eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 159-168.
  • Williams, J. (2012). “The potential role(s) of writing in second language development”, in Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321-331.
  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2001). “Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis” in B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (eds.), Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1-37.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet