Prejudice, Social Dominance, and Similarity among People who Favor Integration of Minorities
- Martínez Martínez, María del Carmen
- Saiz Vidallet, José Luis
- Angosto Alcón, Josefa María
ISSN: 1138-7416
Ano de publicación: 2016
Volume: 19
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology
Resumo
This study examines differences in prejudice, perceived similarity, and social dominance in members of the majority who favor integration as a means of minority acculturation. A total of 342 non-Gypsy Spanish participants filled out a questionnaire about their relationship to one of three outgroups: Maghrebians, Gypsies, and Latin Americans. Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that a three-cluster solution was most fitting for every outgroup. ANOVAs applied to the three clusters indicated significant differences in prejudice, perceived similarity, and social dominance. Referring to Gypsies the largest effect size was observed in manifest prejudice (?2 = .63), in Maghrebians, the largest effect size was observed in subtle prejudice (?2 =.77), while for Latin Americans, perceived similarity had the largest effect size ?2 ( = .60). The results reveal a need to modify existing measures of integration; we recommend using questionnaires to measure behaviors that members of the majority would be willing to implement.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Amnesty International (2012). Elección y prejuicio. Discriminación de personas musulmanas en Europa [Choice and prejudice. Discrimination against Muslims in Europe]. Retrieved from Amnesty International Webpage https://www.amnesty.org/es/documents/eur01/002/2012/es/
- Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.746
- Ben-Shalom, U., & Horenczyk, G. (2003). Acculturation orientations: A facet theory perspective on the bidimensional model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 176–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022102250249
- Berry, J. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In Berman, J. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 457–488). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
- Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697–712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013
- Bourhis, R. Y., Montaruli, E., El-Geledi, S., Harvey, S., & Barrette, G. (2010). Acculturation in multiple host community settings. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 780–802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01675.x
- Cea D’Ancona, M. A., & Vallés Martínez, M. S. (2013). Evolución del racismo, la xenofobia y otras formas conexas de intolerancia en España [Evolution of racism, xenophobia, and other connected forms of intolerance in Spain]. Retrieved from Observatorio Español del Racismo y la Xenofobia Webpage http://explotacion.mtin.gob.es/oberaxe/
- Dinh, K., & Bond, M. (2008). The other side of acculturation: Changes among host individuals and communities in their adaptation to immigrant populations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 283–285.
- Guimond, S., de Oliveira, P., Kamiesjki, R., & Sidanius, J. (2010). The trouble with assimilation: Social dominance and the emergence of hostility against immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 642–650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.01.002
- Hagendoorn, L. (1999). Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. In Hunyady, G., Hamilton, D., & Anh, N. (Eds.), On social perception (pp. 521–549). Budapest, Hungarian: Akadémiai Kiadó.
- Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2013). Estadística del Padrón Continuo a 1 de enero 2013 [Statistics from continuous municipal records through January 1, 2013]. Retrieved from INE Webpage http://www.ine.es/jaxi/tabla.do?path=/t20/e245/p05/a2013/l0/&file=00030003.px&type=pcaxis&L=0
- Kalin, R., & Berry, J. W. (1996). Interethnic attitudes in Canada: Ethnocentrism, consensual hierarchy and reciprocity. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 253–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.28.4.253
- Kosic, A., Manneti, L., & Sam, D. L. (2005). The role of majority attitudes towards out-group in the perception of the acculturation strategies of immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 273–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.004
- Kunst, J. R., Sam, D. L., & Ulleberg, P. (2013). Perceived Islamophobia: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 225–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.11.001
- Matera, C., Stefanile, C., & Brown, R. (2012). Host culture adoption or intercultural contact? Comparing different acculturation conceptualizations and their effects on host members’ attitudes towards immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 459–471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.03.002
- Martínez, C., Paterna, C., Rosa, A. I., & Angosto, J. (2000). El principio de jerarquía social como explicación del prejuicio y el rechazo a la acción positiva [The principle of social hierarchy as an explanation of prejudice and rejection of affirmative action]. Psicología Política, 21, 55–71.
- Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294245
- Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). Multiculturalism and intergroup relations: Implications for democracy in global context. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
- Navas, M., García, M., Rojas, A., Pumares, P., & Cuadrado, I. (2006). Actitudes de aculturación y prejuicio: La perspectiva de autóctonos e inmigrantes [Acculturation attitudes and prejudice: The perspective of natives and immigrants]. Psicothema, 18, 187–193.
- Navas, M. S., Pumares, P., Sánchez, J., García, M. C., Rojas, A. J., Cuadrado, I., … Fernández, J. S. (2004). Estrategias y actitudes de aculturación: La perspectiva de los inmigrantes y de los autóctonos en Almería [Acculturation strategies and attitudes: Immigrants’ and natives’ perspectives in Almería]. Sevilla, Spain: Junta de Andalucía.
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
- Pettigrew, T., & Tropp, L. (2011). When groups meet. The dynamic of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Piontkowski, U., Florack, A., Hoelker, P., & Obdrzálek, P. (2000). Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(1), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00020-6
- Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 271–320). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
- Rueda, J. F., & Navas, M. (1996). Hacia una evaluación de las nuevas formas del prejuicio racial: Las actitudes sutiles del racismo [Assessing new forms of racial prejudice: Subtle racist attitudes]. Revista de Psicología Social, 11, 131–149.
- Rudmin, F. W. (2003). Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.250
- Rudmin, F. W., & Ahmadzadeh, V. (2001). Psychometric critique of acculturation psychology: The case of Iranian migrants in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 41–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00213
- Secretaria de Estado de Inmigración y Emigración (2014). II Plan Estratégico de Ciudadanía e Integración 2011–2014 [2nd Citizenship and Integration Strategy Plan, 2011–2014]. Retrieved from Secretaria de Estado de Inmigración y Emigración Webpage http://extranjeros.empleo.gob.es/es/Programas_Integracion/Plan_estrategico2011/pdf/PECI-2011-2014.pdf
- Fundación Secretariado Gitano (2007). Mapa sobre vivienda y comunidad gitana en España [Map of Gypsy housing and community in Spain]. Retrieved from Fundación Secretariado Gitano Webpage http://www.gitanos.org/publicaciones/mapavivienda/
- Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Thomsen, L., Green, E. G. T., & Sidanius, J. (2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1455–1464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.011
- Tip, L. K., Zagefka, H., González, R., Brown, R., Cinnirella, M., & Na, X. (2012). Is support for multiculturalism threatened by…threat itself? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(1), 22–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.09.011
- Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 199–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127184
- Zagefka, H., & Brown, R. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant-majority relations in Germany, European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 171–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.73
- Zick, A., Wagner, U., van Dick, R., & Petzel, T. (2001). Acculturation and prejudice in Germany: Majority and minority perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 541–557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00228