Efecto del nivel de experiencia clínica del examinador sobre la validez de criterio y fiabilidad inter-sesión de cinco medidas del rango de movimiento de la flexión dorsal del tobillo

  1. Gómez-Jiménez, F.
  2. Ayala, F.
  3. Cejudo, A.
  4. Sainz de Baranda, P.
  5. Santonja, F.
Revista:
Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1578-8423,  1989-5879

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 15

Número: 3

Páginas: 123-134

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4321/S1578-84232015000300012 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el efecto que el diferente grado de experiencia del examinador tiene sobre la validez de criterio y fiabilidad inter-sesión de las medidas de rango de movimiento de la flexión dorsal del tobillo (ROMFDT) obtenidas en las pruebas: flexión dorsal del tobillo pasiva en decúbito prono y rodilla flexionada (FDPAS), zancada coninclinómetro (FDZAN-INC) y cinta métrica (FDZAN-MET), zancada modificada con taburete (FDZAN-TAB) y zancada modificada con cajón (FDZAN-CAJ). Un total de 17 deportistas recreativos completaron este estudio. Cada participante fue evaluado por dos examinadores con distinto nivel de experiencia (experto y novel) del ROMFDT empleando 5 pruebas exploratorias diferentes en dos sesiones distintas. Los resultados muestran bajos valores de validez para el examinador novel en todas las pruebas de valoración del ROMFDTexcepto en la prueba FDZAN-INC (error típico de la estimación estandarizado = 0,5 [pequeño]; Pearson = 0,85 [moderado]; kappa = 0,74 [buena]). El examinador experto presentó niveles altos de fiabilidad inter-sesión en las pruebas FDZAN-INC, FDZAN-MET y FDZAN-CAJ y valores aceptables en las pruebas FDPAS y FDZAN-TAB. El examinador novel obtuvo valores aceptables de fiabilidad en toda las pruebas de valoración excepto en la prueba FDPAS, que fueron considerados como no aceptables. Por lo tanto, se recomienda que tanto los examinadores expertos como noveles utilicen la prueba FDZAN-INC para: (a) identificar a personas con restringida o normal movilidad de la flexión dorsal del tobillo; y (b) monitorizar la eficacia de los programas de intervención aplicados en caso de ser necesarios.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Academy of Orthopaedic Association (1965). Joint Motion: Method of Measuring and Recording. Chicago: Park Ridge.
  • American Medical Association (2001). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 4th ed. Milwaukee, WI: Author.
  • Atkinson, G., y Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 26(4), 217-238.
  • Atkinson, G., Nevill, A.M., y Edwards, B. (1999). What is an accep table amount of measurement error? The application of meaningful ''analytical goals'' to the reliability of sports science measurements made on a ratio scale. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 18.
  • Beazell, J.R., Grindstaff, T.L., Sauer, L.D., Magrum, E.M., Ingersoll, C.D., y Hertel, J. (2012). Effects of a proximal or distal tibiofibular joint manipulation on ankle range of motion and functional outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42(2), 125-134.
  • Bennell, K., Talbot, R., Wajswelner, H., Techovanich, W., Kelly, D., y Hall, A.J. (1998). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weightbearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 44(3), 175-180.
  • Bland, J.M., & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1, 307-310.
  • Bohannon, R.W., Tiberio, D., y Waters, G. (1991). Motion Measured from Forefoot and Hindfoot Landmarks During Passive Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion 1. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 13(1), 20-22.
  • Cejudo, A., Sainz de Baranda, P., Ayala, F., y Santonja, F. (2014). A simplified version of the weight-bearing ankle lunge test: Description and test-retest reliability. Manual Therapy, 19, 355-359
  • Cejudo, A., Sainz de Baranda, P., Ayala, F., y Santonja, F. (2014). Testretest reliability of seven common clinical tests for assessing lower extremity muscles flexibility in futsal and handball players. Physical Therapy in Sport. (in press).
  • Denegar, C.R., Hertel, J., y Fonseca, J. (2002). The effect of lateral ankle sprain on dorsiflexion range of motion, posterior talar glide, and joint laxity. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 32(4), 166-173.
  • DiGiovanni, C.W., Kuo, R., Tejwani, N., Price, R., HansenJr, S.T., Cziernecki, J., y Sangeorzan, B.J. (2002). Isolated gastrocnemius tightness. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 84(6), 962-970.
  • Grindstaff, T.L., Hertel, J., Beazell, J.R., Magrum, E.M., y Ingersoll, C.D. (2009). Effects of lumbopelvic joint manipulation on quadriceps activation and strength in healthy individuals. Manual therapy, 14(4), 415-420.
  • Hoch, M. C., Staton, G. S., y McKeon, P. O. (2011). Dorsiflexion range of motion significantly influences dynamic balance. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(1), 90-92.
  • Hopkins, W.G. (2007). A spreadsheet for deriving a confidence interval, mechanistic inference and clinical inference from a p value. Sportscience 11, 16-20
  • Hopkins, W.G. (2000a) Measures of validity. Sportscience. http://www.sportsci.org/index.html. AccessedJune 8, 2013.
  • Hopkins, W.G. (2000b). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine, 30(1), 1-15.
  • Hopkins, W.G. (2004). Bias in Bland-Altman but not regression validity analyses. Sportscience, 8(4).
  • Hopkins, W.G, Marshall, S., Batterham, A., y Hanin, J. (2009). Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(1), 3-13.
  • Kaufman, K.R., Brodine, S.K., Shaffer, R.A., Johnson, C.W., y Cullison, T.R. (1999). The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 27(5), 585-593.
  • Konor, M.M., Morton, S., Eckerson, J.M., y Grindstaff, T.L. (2012). Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(3), 279-287
  • Krause, D. A., Cloud, B. A., Forster, L. A., Schrank, J. A., y Hollman, J. H. (2011). Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion: a comparison of active and passive techniques in multiple positions. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 20(3), 333-344.
  • Landis, J.R., y Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159-174.
  • Magee, D.J. (2002). Orthopedic physical assessment, (4th ed.), vol. 11. W.B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Martin, R.L., y McPoil, T.G. (2005). Reliability of ankle goniometric measurements: a literature review. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 95(6), 564-572.
  • Mayer, T.G., Kondraske, G., Beals, S.B., y Gatchel, R.J. (1997). Spinal range of motion: accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Spine, 22(17), 1976-1984.
  • Munteanu, S.E., Strawhorn, A.B., Landorf, K.B., Bird, A.R., y Murley, G.S. (2009). A weightbearing technique for the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended is reliable. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(1), 54-59.
  • O'Shea, S., y Grafton, K. (2013). The intra and inter-rater reliability of a modified weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Manual Therapy, 18(3), 264-268.
  • Palmer, M.L. y Epler, M.E. (2002). Fundamentos de las Técnicas de la Evaluación Musculoesquelética. Barcelona: Paidotribo.
  • Pope, R., Herbert, R., y Kirwan, J. (1998). Effects of ankle dorsiflexion range and pre-exercise calf muscle stretching on injury risk in army recruits. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 44(3), 165-172.
  • Prentice, W.E. (2003). The Thigh, Hip, Groin, and Pelvis. In: Arnheim's Principles of Athletic Training: A Competency-Based Approach (11th ed). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Scharfbillig, R., y Scutter, S. D. (2004). Measurement of foot dorsiflexion: a modified Lidcombe template. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 94(6), 573-577.
  • Simondson, D., Brock, K., y Cotton, S. (2012). Reliability and smallest real difference of the ankle lunge test post ankle fracture. Manual Therapy, 17(1), 34-38.
  • Stefanyshyn, D.J., y Engsberg, J.R. (1994). Right to left differences in the ankle joint complex range of motion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 26(5), 551-555.
  • Tiberio, D., Bohannon, R.W., y Zito, M.A. (1989). Effect of subtalar joint position on the measurement of maximum ankle dorsiflexic. Clinical Biomechanics, 4(3), 189-191.
  • Venturini, C., Ituassú, N.T., Teixeira, L.M., y Deus, C.V.O. (2006). Intrarater and interrater reliability of two methods for measuring the active range of motion for ankle dorsiflexion in healthy subjects. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 10(4), 407-411.
  • Vicenzino, B., Branjerdporn, M., Teys, P., y Jordan, K. (2006). Initial changes in posterior talar glide and dorsiflexion of the ankle after mobilization with movement in individuals with recurrent ankle sprain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 36(7), 464-471.
  • Weir, J.P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231-240.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet