Comportamiento innovador y adopción de sistemas de gestión del conocimiento

  1. Meroño Cerdán, Ángel Luis
  2. López Nicolás, Carolina
Revista:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Año de publicación: 2013

Título del ejemplar: PYME y emprendimiento innovador

Número: 388

Páginas: 87-94

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Economía industrial

Resumen

The more traditional view conceives knowledge management as a tool aimed at facilitating innovation. This research focuses on the needs created by the innovative behavior of firms that are covered by the adoption of knowledge management systems. The main contribution is to fill a gap by deeply examining the causal relationship between knowledge and innovation. Data from over 12,000 Spanish companies confirmed the adoption of knowledge management systems in response to needs by the companies involved in innovation processes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALAVI, M.; LEIDNER, D. (2001: Review: «Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues». MIS Quarterly, vol. 25, nº 1, pp. 107-136.
  • BIERLY, P. y DALY, P (2002): «Aligning human resource management practices and knowledge strategies: a theoretical framework». In C.W. Choo; N. Bontis (Eds.), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge, Oxford University Press.
  • CANTNER, U.; JOEL, K. y SCHMIDT, T. (2011): «The effects of knowledge management on innovative success – An empirical analysis of German firms». Research Policy, vol. 40, nº 10, pp. 1453-1462.
  • COHEN, W. y KLEPPER, S. (1996): «Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D». Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78, nº 2, pp. 232-243.
  • DAVIES, S. (1979): The Diffusion of Process Innovations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • GARCÍA-VEGA, M. y LÓPEZ, A. (2010): «Determinants of Abandoning Innovative Activities: Evidence from Spanish Firms». Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, nº 45, pp. 69-92
  • GEISLER, E. (2010): «Measuring the contributions of knowledge management systems to the strategic competitiveness of organizations: A review and a model». International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, vol. 7, nº 2, pp. 89–107.
  • GREEN (2000): Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • HAIR, J.; ANDERSON, R.; TATHAN, R. y BLACK, W. (1995): Multi variate Data Analysis with Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall, New York.
  • HANSEN, M.T. y VON, O.B. (2001): «Introducing t-shaped manger: knowledge management’s next generation». Harvard Business Review, vol. 79 nº 3, pp. 106-16.
  • HIDALGO, A. y ALBORS, J. (2008): «Innovation management techniques and tools: a review from theory and practice». R&D Management, vol. 38, nº 2, pp. 113-127.
  • HJALAGER, A.M. (2010): «A review of innovation research in tourism». Tourism Management, vol. 31, nº 1, pp. 1-12.
  • KHALIFA, M.; YU, A. y SHEN, K. (2008): «Knowledge management systems success: a contingency perspective». Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 12, nº 1, pp. 119-132.
  • KUO, R. y LEE, G. (2009); «KMS adoption: the effects of information quality». Management Decision, vol. 47, nº 10, pp. 1633-1651.
  • KUO, R.; LAI, M. y LEE, G. (2011): «The impact of empowering leadership for KMS adoption». Management Decision, vol. 49, nº 7, pp. 1120-1140.
  • LAI, J.Y. (2008) «How knowledge map fit and personalization affect success of KMS in high-tech fir:ms». Technovation, vol. 29, nº 4, pp. 313-24.
  • LÓPEZ-NICOLÁS, C. y MEROÑO-CERDÁN, A.L. (2009): «The impact of organizational culture on the use of ICT for knowledge management». Electronic Markets, vol. 19, nº 4, pp. 211-219.
  • LOVE, J.H. y ROPER, S. (2002): «Internal Versus External R&D: A Study of R&D Choice with Sample Selection». International Journal of the Economics of Business, vol. 9, nº 2, pp. 239- 255.
  • MARINOVA, D. (2004): «Actualizing Innovation Effort: The Impact of Market Knowledge Diffusion in a Dynamic System of Com petition», Journal of Marketing, vol. 68, nº 3, pp. 1-20.
  • MEROÑO CERDÁN, A.L. (2005): «Tecnologías de Información y Gestión del Conocimiento: Integración en un Sistema». Economía Industrial, nº 357, pp. 107-116.
  • MOHNEN, P. y RÖLLER L-H. (2005): «Complementarities in innovation policy». European Economic Review, vol. 49, pp. 1431-1450.
  • NAGELKERKE, N. (1991): «A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination», Biometrika, vol 78, nº 3, pp 691-693.
  • OCDE (2005): The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Oslo Mannual, 3rd Edition.
  • PARTHASARTHY, R. y HAMMOND, J. (2002): «Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effects of the innovation process». Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, nº 1, pp. 75-91.
  • SIMPSON, P.M., SIGUA, J.A. y ENZ, C.A. (2006): «Innovation orientation outcomes: The good and the bad», Journal of Business Research, vol. 59, nº 10-11, pp. 1133–1141.
  • XU, J. y QUADDUS, M. (2005): «Exploring the perceptions of knowledge management systems». Journal of Management Deve lopment, vol. 24, nº 4, pp. 320–334.
  • YLI-RENKO, H.; AUTIO, E. y SAPIENZA, H.J. (2001): «Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge explotation in young technology-based firms». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, nº 6-7, pp. 587-613.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet